[Bug c++/52477] Wrong initialization order? __attribute__((constructor)) vs static data access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71437] [7 regression] Performance regression after r235817

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437 --- Comment #18 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Mar 16 03:19:35 2017 New Revision: 246186 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246186=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71437 * tree-ssa-dom.c (struct

[Bug tree-optimization/71437] [7 regression] Performance regression after r235817

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437 --- Comment #18 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Mar 16 03:19:35 2017 New Revision: 246186 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246186=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71437 * tree-ssa-dom.c (struct

[Bug c++/58054] [DR 372] 11.3 Friends, example from standard not compiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58054 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/51428] Some code after SSA expand does nothing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51428 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/80042] gcc thinks sin/cos don't set errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80042 --- Comment #3 from Craig Topper --- No -fmath-errno has no effect. It does have effect on other functions such as cosh or acos.

[Bug c++/70515] Nested lambdas causing invalid captured pointers on some platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70515 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79790] [C++17] ICE class template argument deduction failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79790 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/80042] gcc thinks sin/cos don't set errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80042 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment

[Bug debug/43989] g++ missing the debug information of unused local static variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43989 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/47591] libiberty Makefile uses native cc (solaris) with option -print-multi-os-directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47591 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70377] "unexpected AST" and "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" from throw in simple constexpr fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70377 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- I've raised bug 80061 for the error GCC issues for the submitted test case after the bug(s) in have been corrected.

[Bug c++/80061] New: error on constexpr function with an unevaluated throw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80061 Bug ID: 80061 Summary: error on constexpr function with an unevaluated throw Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/70377] "unexpected AST" and "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" from throw in simple constexpr fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70377 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug c++/80043] [6/7 Regression] ICE with pointer-to-member-function and -fpermissive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80043 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/39982] Fail to use constructor to initialize volatile declaration (no matching function for call)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39982 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/69054] g++ fails to diagnose ambiguous overload resolution when implicit conversions are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69054 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/53731] [4.7] Bootstrap fails for libgfortran on Solaris 10 x86 with error "Where has __float128 gone?"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53731 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/68069] -fstack-protector does not protect from buffer overflow attack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68069 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/44943] Need documentation on the intended semantics of "volatile" (in C)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44943 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/57683] Parallel build failure: generated prerequisite header not built in time (insn-opinit.h)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57683 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/60515] Compiler crash with -g and -mpoke-function-name option combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60515 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/67479] Support for -Wformat-pedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67479 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug c++/78014] -Wformat -vs- size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78014 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/80060] RFE: -Wformat knob to ignore same-width incorrect types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80060 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug target/80017] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80017 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Mar 15 23:04:09 2017 New Revision: 246181 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246181=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-15 Vladimir Makarov PR target/80017

[Bug c++/52477] Wrong initialization order? __attribute__((constructor)) vs static data access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/80060] New: RFE: -Wformat knob to ignore same-width incorrect types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80060 Bug ID: 80060 Summary: RFE: -Wformat knob to ignore same-width incorrect types Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/52471] ICE bootstrapping GCC 4.7.0-20120302 on x86_64 OpenBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52471 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/33777] Crash during a build of zsh

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33777 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/69499] [F03] ICE-on-invalid on combining select type with wrong statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69499 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle --- Always helps to double check. The three original test cases do not ICE on trunk and gfc_release_symbol is already NULL guarded internally. I would not chase this further on trunk for the first three

[Bug middle-end/51769] bootstrap fails when using -O2 -funswitch-loops -floop-flatten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51769 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/50398] ICE when compiling openssl-1.0.0d with -O2 -floop-flatten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50398 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/80059] New: [7 Regression] ICE with invalid noexcept for __transaction_atomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80059 Bug ID: 80059 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE with invalid noexcept for __transaction_atomic Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug bootstrap/47923] Errors when installing GCC 4.5.2 on AIX 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47923 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/69499] [F03] ICE-on-invalid on combining select type with wrong statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69499 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- Very good question, maybe we do: if (p) gfc_release_symbol (p); I will try it.

[Bug c++/80043] [6/7 Regression] ICE with pointer-to-member-function and -fpermissive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80043 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 15 21:32:43 2017 New Revision: 246180 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246180=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80043 - ICE with -fpermissive * typeck.c

[Bug target/60808] Typo in definition of ATxmega256A3BU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60808 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug regression/59608] Unable to build working poedit v.1.5.x using gcc 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59608 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/79038] Improve PowerPC ISA 3.0 conversion between integers and hardware _Float128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79038 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Wed Mar 15 21:17:35 2017 New Revision: 246178 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246178=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-03-15 Michael Meissner PR

[Bug target/54584] m68k-uclinux error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80057] typo in mips.opt: Virtualization Application Specific

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80057 --- Comment #2 from Roland Illig --- Citing from the PDF document: > The Virtualization Application-Specific Extension (Module) requires the > following base architecture support: The current GCC code split these words at the following

[Bug c++/80043] [6/7 Regression] ICE with pointer-to-member-function and -fpermissive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80043 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/33271] nint_2.f90 abort compiled with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33271 --- Comment #22 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Mar 15 20:48:49 2017 New Revision: 246174 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246174=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Do not xfail nint_2.f90 on Linux systems It was XFAILed because

[Bug bootstrap/80047] fixincludes/fixincl.c: PVS-Studio: Improper Release of Memory Before Removing Last Reference (CWE-401)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80047 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |bootstrap --- Comment #3 from Martin

[Bug other/80058] New: fix double spaces is string literals everywhere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80058 Bug ID: 80058 Summary: fix double spaces is string literals everywhere Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/80047] fixincludes/fixincl.c: PVS-Studio: Improper Release of Memory Before Removing Last Reference (CWE-401)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80047 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >char cwdbuf[MAXPATHLEN]; This is not a GNU style thing. GNU style mentions against using arbitrary limits.

[Bug other/80047] fixincludes/fixincl.c: PVS-Studio: Improper Release of Memory Before Removing Last Reference (CWE-401)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80047 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/62045] [5/6 Regression] __gnu_pbds::priority_queue<int, less, binary_heap_tag> is too slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62045 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] |[5/6 Regression]

[Bug libstdc++/62045] [5/6/7 Regression] __gnu_pbds::priority_queue<int, less, binary_heap_tag> is too slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62045 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Mar 15 20:11:48 2017 New Revision: 246173 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246173=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/62045 fix O(N) insertion in pd_ds binary heap 2017-03-15  Xi Ruoyao 

[Bug target/71294] [6 Regression] ICE in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4442 on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71294 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38580|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/71294] [6 Regression] ICE in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4442 on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71294 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/71294] [6 Regression] ICE in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4442 on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71294 --- Comment #16 from Michael Meissner --- You need power8 support for the bug to show itself. In order to have power8 (ISA 2.07) support, you need a binutils that supports at least the power8 instructions.

[Bug translation/80055] do not mark internal compiler error messages for i18n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80055 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug target/71294] [6 Regression] ICE in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4442 on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71294 --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool --- You need to build GCC with a new enough binutils, 2.24 I believe.

[Bug fortran/69499] [F03] ICE-on-invalid on combining select type with wrong statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69499 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Just a quick question: are you sure that removing 'gfc_release_symbol (p);' does not cause a memory leak in the normal case?

[Bug c++/62181] [C/C++] Expected new warning: "adding 'char' to a string does not append to the string" [-Wstring-plus-int]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #8) > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #7) > > > We should make a new PR requesting for clang -Warray-bounds as well. It's > > a part of meta-bug PR30334. > > Sorry.

[Bug target/71294] [6 Regression] ICE in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4442 on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71294 --- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt --- I can't reproduce this, but that's probably because of cc1plus: warning: will not generate power8 instructions because assembler lacks power8 support Binutils was just configured for ppc64le-linux - do I

[Bug c++/62181] [C/C++] Expected new warning: "adding 'char' to a string does not append to the string" [-Wstring-plus-int]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181 --- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #7) > We should make a new PR requesting for clang -Warray-bounds as well. It's > a part of meta-bug PR30334. Sorry. We have -Warray-bounds, but not as well as clang's.

[Bug c++/62181] [C/C++] Expected new warning: "adding 'char' to a string does not append to the string" [-Wstring-plus-int]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181 --- Comment #7 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #6) > With constant arguments (or those whose value or range is known), GCC should > warn on the first declaration in comment #0 (copied below) not necessarily > because

[Bug target/80057] typo in mips.opt: Virtualization Application Specific

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80057 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69499] [F03] ICE-on-invalid on combining select type with wrong statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69499 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- I will take care of it. Thanks Nicolas

[Bug target/80057] New: typo in mips.opt: Virtualization Application Specific

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80057 Bug ID: 80057 Summary: typo in mips.opt: Virtualization Application Specific Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/80056] New: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr66295.c fails on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80056 Bug ID: 80056 Summary: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr66295.c fails on powerpc Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug target/71294] [6 Regression] ICE in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4442 on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71294 --- Comment #13 from Michael Meissner --- FWIW, it does not fail for -mcpu=power7 or -mcpu=power9. If you use -mcpu=power7, there is no direct move. If you use -mcpu=power9, the MTVSRDD instruction is generated which bypasses the part that is

[Bug fortran/79860] i18n: single-word translation in "Character-valued %s %qs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79860 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/69499] [F03] ICE-on-invalid on combining select type with wrong statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69499 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Koenig --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6) > > This falls into the PITA classification. Also known as simple enough, > regression test and commit. (consider it approved) I don't think I can submit patches

[Bug fortran/79860] i18n: single-word translation in "Character-valued %s %qs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79860 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Mar 15 18:05:06 2017 New Revision: 246170 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246170=gcc=rev Log: Fix translation issue with character length * errors (PR fortran/79860)

[Bug tree-optimization/78687] inefficient code generated for eggs.variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor --- Created attachment 40979 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40979=edit Possible fix This patch addresses the issue and passes bootstrap and testing on x86_64-linux. It is definitely too

[Bug rtl-optimization/79856] rtl_verify_edges: use internal_error instead of error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79856 --- Comment #8 from Roland Illig --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7) > I like your rules. My question was more about how practically do you > distinguish between such strings? My plan is to create a new > DK_INTERNAL_ERROR type, which

[Bug translation/80055] New: do not mark arguments of internal_error for i18n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80055 Bug ID: 80055 Summary: do not mark arguments of internal_error for i18n Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/62181] [C/C++] Expected new warning: "adding 'char' to a string does not append to the string" [-Wstring-plus-int]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/80054] New: ICE in verify_ssa with -O3 -march=broadwell/skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80054 Bug ID: 80054 Summary: ICE in verify_ssa with -O3 -march=broadwell/skylake-avx512 Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/80053] New: Label with address taken should prevent duplication of containing basic block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80053 Bug ID: 80053 Summary: Label with address taken should prevent duplication of containing basic block Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/80052] typo in aarch64.opt: dummping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80052 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80052] New: typo in aarch64.opt: dummping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80052 Bug ID: 80052 Summary: typo in aarch64.opt: dummping Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/80019] ICE in ix86_vector_duplicate_value, at config/i386/i386.c:42584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80019 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80019] ICE in ix86_vector_duplicate_value, at config/i386/i386.c:42584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80019 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Mar 15 16:15:53 2017 New Revision: 246168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246168=gcc=rev Log: PR target/80019 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug other/80051] gcc/dwarf2out.c: PVS-Studio: V501

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80051 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356 --- Comment #10 from Jiong Wang --- Author: jiwang Date: Wed Mar 15 15:33:12 2017 New Revision: 246167 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246167=gcc=rev Log: [gcc, testsuite] Don't xfail on arm PR testsuite/79356 *

[Bug target/80019] ICE in ix86_vector_duplicate_value, at config/i386/i386.c:42584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80019 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Mar 15 15:27:28 2017 New Revision: 246166 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246166=gcc=rev Log: PR target/80019 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug sanitizer/77631] no symbols in backtrace shown by ASan when debug info is split

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to myself from comment #6) > This has been (with low priority) on my long TODO list > for some time: ever since I started using -gsplit-dwarf and noticed that > GCC's Internal Compiler Error

[Bug c++/80045] [cilkplus] The destruction of the temporary variable is not in the child

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80045 --- Comment #4 from Florent Hivert --- I should have said first : thanks for analizing the problem !!! I wasn't sure about the proper way to do thing and I was afraid that no one Cilk aware was following gcc-help. Anyway I should have mentioned

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 --- Comment #6 from Yichao Yu --- Anything new here?

[Bug other/80051] New: gcc/dwarf2out.c: PVS-Studio: V501

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80051 Bug ID: 80051 Summary: gcc/dwarf2out.c: PVS-Studio: V501 Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug other/80050] New: gcc/genmatch.c: PVS-Studio: V590

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80050 Bug ID: 80050 Summary: gcc/genmatch.c: PVS-Studio: V590 Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug other/80049] New: gcc/genmodes.c: PVS-Studio: NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80049 Bug ID: 80049 Summary: gcc/genmodes.c: PVS-Studio: NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476) Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/80048] New: gcc/sese.c: PVS-Studio: Improper Release of Memory Before Removing Last Reference (CWE-401)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80048 Bug ID: 80048 Summary: gcc/sese.c: PVS-Studio: Improper Release of Memory Before Removing Last Reference (CWE-401) Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/80047] New: fixincludes/fixincl.c: PVS-Studio: Improper Release of Memory Before Removing Last Reference (CWE-401)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80047 Bug ID: 80047 Summary: fixincludes/fixincl.c: PVS-Studio: Improper Release of Memory Before Removing Last Reference (CWE-401) Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status:

[Bug fortran/80046] New: Explicit interface required for at (1): pointer argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80046 Bug ID: 80046 Summary: Explicit interface required for at (1): pointer argument Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug jit/64089] libgccjit.so.0.0.1 linkage failure on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089 --- Comment #13 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Can we apply this patch to trunk before 7.1 is released? It would allow to build and run jit on Darwin: diff --git a/gcc/jit/Make-lang.in b/gcc/jit/Make-lang.in index 44d0750..4df2a9c 100644 ---

[Bug lto/66295] [5/6/7 Regression] LTO generates incorrect resolver call for function multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug target/80019] ICE in ix86_vector_duplicate_value, at config/i386/i386.c:42584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80019 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Mar 15 13:38:51 2017 New Revision: 246161 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246161=gcc=rev Log: PR target/80019 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug c++/80038] Random segfault using local vectors in Cilk function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038 --- Comment #10 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > which means the spawned copies use a shared vnew and a single destructor > is run "afterwards". If there's no synchronization then all threads will > call the

[Bug target/79939] [nvptx] gcc hangs in nvptx_assemble_value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79939 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80038] Random segfault using local vectors in Cilk function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ryxi at stu dot xidian.edu.cn --- Comment

[Bug c++/80045] [cilkplus] The destruction of the temporary variable is not in the child

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80045 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80045] [cilkplus] The destruction of the temporary variable is not in the child

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80045 --- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao --- On 2017-03-15 10:50 +, florent.hivert at lri dot fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80045 > > --- Comment #1 from Florent Hivert --- > I'm not sure why you created a new report. I

[Bug target/80035] [nvptx] non-returning function call causes ptxas sigsegv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80035 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >