http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05
16:24:07 UTC ---
Yeah + there is quite nice code size savings. I must say it took quite a while
to chase out all bugs that was affecting tramp3d's performance.
One
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
15:07:58 UTC ---
Mainline -O3
Time spent in iteration: 11.0926
LTO (with today fix for resolution info)
Time spent in iteration: 10.9666
LTO with V1 API hack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
17:30:51 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Oct 6 17:30:42 2012
New Revision: 192166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192166
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-04 15:57:19 UTC ---
I will take a look how LTO can help us. I believe part of the problem should
be fixed by dropping the COMDAT hack for V1 API that is on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
16:07:19 UTC ---
I assume it is with linker plugin, right? In that case we need to track why
some of the functions do not become static.
There is bug in this right now,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-04 16:16:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I assume it is with linker plugin, right?
Yes.
I assume you do see improvements with -O3 -fwhole-program?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-10-04 19:17:46 UTC
---
I assume you do see improvements with -O3 -fwhole-program? (it improves the
scores in my setup, I would be curious to see how it compares to other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-04 19:40:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I assume you do see improvements with -O3 -fwhole-program? (it improves
the
scores in my setup, I would
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
12 matches
Mail list logo
