[Bug fortran/30452] Strange syntax error with high-value character

2007-01-13 Thread Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
--- Comment #3 from Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2007-01-13 08:42 --- Subject: Re: Strange syntax error with high-value character jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: Turns out that the character 254 which is Hex FE is also the 2's complement representation of -2 which is

Where did you get so small prick?

2007-01-13 Thread Janosevic Maria
Salute Man Don't tell me why your schlong is so small, I will better help you to make it really Bigger! Why bigger? Because over 74% of all women need a longer one-eyed monster to satisfy their desire! Go there and get your solution: http://www.nattiaho.com It'll really help you! We will

[Bug fortran/30452] Strange syntax error with high-value character

2007-01-13 Thread Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
--- Comment #4 from Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2007-01-13 11:51 --- Subject: Re: Strange syntax error with high-value character jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: Turns out that the character 254 which is Hex FE is also the 2's complement representation of -2 which is

[Bug libstdc++/14991] stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date

2007-01-13 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
-- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot de |dot org |

[Bug libstdc++/14991] stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date

2007-01-13 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 12:24 --- Subject: Bug 14991 Author: paolo Date: Sat Jan 13 12:24:02 2007 New Revision: 120749 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120749 Log: 2007-01-13 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libstdc++/14991] stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date

2007-01-13 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 12:24 --- Subject: Bug 14991 Author: paolo Date: Sat Jan 13 12:24:20 2007 New Revision: 120750 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120750 Log: 2007-01-13 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libstdc++/14991] stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date

2007-01-13 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-01-13 12:25 --- Fixed for 4.2.0. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/30367] gfortran compile times excessive with -Wall

2007-01-13 Thread Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov
--- Comment #3 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 12:35 --- I've just tried to duplicate the compile time difference with -Wall and found that the -Wall was a red herring -- it always takes 169 minutes to compile our code with gfortran, -Wall or not. This is about 8 times

[Bug target/8512] [hppa64-hp-hpux11.11] libstdc++-v3 fails to build with HP assembler

2007-01-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 16:01 --- The problem reported in the PR is fixed in 4.0. Other issues that prevented building libstdc++-v3 using HP as are fixed in 4.0.4 by these two changes: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01060.html

[Bug c++/28451] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with invalid default template parameter

2007-01-13 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 17:08 --- This seems to be a duplicate of PR29573, as it was fixed by the same patch. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29573 *** -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/29573] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE after parse error in template argument

2007-01-13 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 17:08 --- *** Bug 28451 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29573

[Bug target/30406] ICE in LOGICAL(8) functions

2007-01-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #24 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-01-13 17:09 --- I have applied the change to the latest snapshot (4.3.0 20070112) and the tests compile now without error on OSX 10.3.9. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30406

[Bug fortran/30367] gfortran compile times excessive with -Wall

2007-01-13 Thread kargl at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #4 from kargl at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2007-01-13 17:23 --- Subject: Re: gfortran compile times excessive with -Wall Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov wrote: Gfortran's compilation time is mainly due to a three routines that take on the order of 1/2

[Bug c/28492] -Wmissing-format-attribute causes warning for vsnprintf()

2007-01-13 Thread h dot b dot furuseth at usit dot uio dot no
--- Comment #1 from h dot b dot furuseth at usit dot uio dot no 2007-01-13 18:40 --- The warning is a bit misleading, function might be possible candidate for 'printf' format attribute means the _calling_ function might be such a candidate, not the function being called on the line

[Bug fortran/30452] Strange syntax error with high-value character

2007-01-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 18:45 --- Assuming this regression tests OK, I think this is an obvious and simple Thanks :) -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/30456] New: tgmath.h not found

2007-01-13 Thread schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
It seems that tgmath.h is not available on Darwin: $ gcc-dp-4.2 -std=gnu99 -Wall -o complex complex.c complex.c:3:20: error: tgmath.h: No such file or directory $ gcc-dp-4.2 --version gcc-dp-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.0 20060729 (experimental) There is no file tgmath.h provided with the compiler that could

[Bug c/30457] New: Please warn about va_start(ap, invalid)

2007-01-13 Thread h dot b dot furuseth at usit dot uio dot no
Here is some undefined behavior which it would be nice if gcc warned about, since stdarg is such a hairy part of the standard: #include stdarg.h void foo(register short paramN, ...) { va_list ap; va_start(ap, paramN); // Undefined by C99 7.15.1.4p4 (va_start): // If the parameter parmN is

[Bug c/30456] tgmath.h not found

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 18:58 --- tgmath.h is not required to be provided by a freestanding compiler so we don't include it. Read: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg00921.html Which is the follow up by JSM on this matter. We will not

[Bug fortran/30435] Slash at end of input not recognized according to standard

2007-01-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 19:08 --- Subject: Bug 30435 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 13 19:08:40 2007 New Revision: 120755 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120755 Log: 2007-01-13 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/30435] Slash at end of input not recognized according to standard

2007-01-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 19:11 --- Subject: Bug 30435 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 13 19:11:02 2007 New Revision: 120756 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120756 Log: 2007-01-13 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug testsuite/12325] gcc.dg/torture/builtin-attr-1.c assumes all targets support inf

2007-01-13 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 19:43 --- Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01146.html Confirm that it cures the testcase on a vax would be nice... -- ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/30435] Slash at end of input not recognized according to standard

2007-01-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 21:00 --- Subject: Bug 30435 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 13 21:00:31 2007 New Revision: 120758 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120758 Log: 2007-01-13 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/30435] Slash at end of input not recognized according to standard

2007-01-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 21:03 --- Subject: Bug 30435 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 13 21:03:17 2007 New Revision: 120759 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120759 Log: 2007-01-13 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/30435] Slash at end of input not recognized according to standard

2007-01-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 21:05 --- Fixed on 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 Drew, thanks for reporting this bug. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30367] gfortran compile times excessive with -Wall

2007-01-13 Thread Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov
--- Comment #5 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:11 --- Created an attachment (id=12896) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12896action=view) Entire compilation log with -fmem-report -ftime-report turned on The trouble routines are part of the Adjoint

[Bug tree-optimization/30440] internal compiler error: in find_or_generate_expression, at tree-ssa-pre.c:1472

2007-01-13 Thread jasonmbechtel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from jasonmbechtel at gmail dot com 2007-01-13 21:11 --- I filed the bug with Ubuntu. It is bug #79132: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/+bug/79132 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30440

[Bug fortran/30367] gfortran compile times excessive with -Wall

2007-01-13 Thread Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov
--- Comment #6 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:12 --- Created an attachment (id=12897) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12897action=view) Lakos-style use associations for residual_turbpart.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367

[Bug tree-optimization/30440] internal compiler error: in find_or_generate_expression, at tree-ssa-pre.c:1472

2007-01-13 Thread jasonmbechtel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from jasonmbechtel at gmail dot com 2007-01-13 21:12 --- I also noticed while recreating the bug for the Ubuntu submission that I made a mistake in my original bug report here. It should be cd Situs_2.2.1/src make all (Note the /src.) --

[Bug fortran/30367] gfortran compile times excessive with -Wall

2007-01-13 Thread Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov
--- Comment #7 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:13 --- Created an attachment (id=12898) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12898action=view) Lakos-style use associations for residual_turbulent.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367

[Bug fortran/30367] gfortran compile times excessive with -Wall

2007-01-13 Thread Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov
--- Comment #8 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:13 --- Created an attachment (id=12899) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12899action=view) Lakos-style use associations for precond_turbpart.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367

[Bug fortran/30367] gfortran compile times excessive with -Wall

2007-01-13 Thread Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov
--- Comment #9 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:14 --- Created an attachment (id=12900) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12900action=view) Lakos-style use associations for precond_turbulent.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367

[Bug fortran/30367] gfortran compile times excessive with -Wall

2007-01-13 Thread Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov
--- Comment #10 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:17 --- Based on the Lakos-style analysis of the dependencies for these particular routines, it /might/ be possible to supply self-contained source; but it will take a while to check with the powers that be. --

[Bug c++/30458] New: ice for legal code at -O3

2007-01-13 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
I just tried to compile Suse Linux package bzflag-2.0.8-22 with the new GNU C compiler version 4.3 snapshot 20070112. The compiler said TimeBomb.cxx: In function 'bool timeBombBoom()': TimeBomb.cxx:23: error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set timeBomb TimeBomb.cxx:23: internal compiler

[Bug c++/30458] ice for legal code at -O3

2007-01-13 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-01-13 21:22 --- Created an attachment (id=12901) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12901action=view) C++ source code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30458

[Bug fortran/30367] gfortran compile times excessive with -Wall

2007-01-13 Thread Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov
--- Comment #11 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:28 --- Created an attachment (id=12902) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12902action=view) An excerpt from precond_turbulent.f90 Here's an excerpt from one of the offenders. Note: the module only has a

[Bug rtl-optimization/30367] gfortran compile times excessive with -Wall

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 21:29 --- global alloc :2249.91 (100%) usr 0.28 (76%) sys2250.16 (100%) wall 3897 kB (13%) ggc flow 2: 0.04 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.03 ( 0%) wall 447 kB ( 2%) ggc reg stack

[Bug c++/30458] ice for legal code at -O3

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 21:33 --- Can you try after: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-01/msg00460.html ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30458

[Bug c++/30458] ice for legal code at -O3

2007-01-13 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-01-13 21:38 --- (In reply to comment #2) Can you try after: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-01/msg00460.html I can't process this until the next snapshot, due 20070119. Is that soon enough ? --

[Bug fortran/30367] gfortran compile times excessive for routines with large numbers of local variables

2007-01-13 Thread Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov
--- Comment #13 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:47 --- Unfortunately, I am working from a binary release I got from http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries. Specifically, I have the 03-Jan-2007 the 32-bit binary from:

[Bug fortran/30283] Specification expression not properly recognized in declaration

2007-01-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 22:12 --- This looks quite easy: pure integer function bar (n) integer, intent(in) :: n bar = n end function bar works. Somebody has forgotten to transfer the result typespec to that of the specification

[Bug rtl-optimization/30367] gfortran compile times excessive for routines with large numbers of local variables

2007-01-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 22:13 --- The binaries will be rebuilt in a few days. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/30089] Compiling FreeFem3d uses unreasonable amount of time and memory

2007-01-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 23:02 --- The patch fixed the freefem memory regression. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30089

[Bug rtl-optimization/30455] i386 generates unnecessary TEST instructions for arithmetic ops on memory

2007-01-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-01-13 23:27 --- Addition (addl) operates in CCGOCmode and is not compatible with requested CCZmode. Following that, test insn will be eliminated in this example: int add_zf(int *x, int y, int a, int b) { if ((*x + y) 0)

[Bug rtl-optimization/30455] i386 generates unnecessary TEST instructions for arithmetic ops on memory

2007-01-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-01-13 23:43 --- (In reply to comment #1) Combine pass then creates: (insn 15 14 16 2 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 58 [ temp.27 ]) (plus:SI (reg/v:SI 62 [ y ]) (mem:SI (reg/v/f:DI 61 [

[Bug ada/26649] hang c34007j

2007-01-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 00:30 --- This is still present in 4.1.2 20070111 (prerelease) on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26649

[Bug testsuite/30459] New: FAIL: g++.dg/eh/ia64-2.C (test for excess errors)

2007-01-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing on host: /xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ -B/xxx/gnu/gc c/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../ /xxx/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/ia64- 2.C -nostdinc++ -I/xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20/libstdc++-v3/include /hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20

[Bug testsuite/25223] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C

2007-01-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 00:50 --- Also present in 4.1.2 20070111 (prerelease). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25223

[Bug target/10127] -fstack-check let's program crash

2007-01-13 Thread jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 00:51 --- I do not see this crash with gcc 4.1.1. Is it still present? I did see it with 3.4.2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10127

[Bug target/30052] memory hog on x86-64

2007-01-13 Thread arekm at pld-linux dot org
--- Comment #5 from arekm at pld-linux dot org 2007-01-14 00:54 --- -O0 passes -O0 -fdefer-pop -fdelayed-branch -fguess-branch-probability -fcprop-registers -fif-conversion -fif-conversion2 -ftree-ccp -ftree-dce -ftree-dominator-opts -ftree-dse -ftree-ter -ftree-lrs -ftree-sra

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/30089] Compiling FreeFem3d uses unreasonable amount of time and memory

2007-01-13 Thread Daniel Berlin
okay, i'll update changelog, submit and commit. On 13 Jan 2007 23:02:13 -, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 23:02 --- The patch fixed the freefem memory regression. --

[Bug tree-optimization/30089] Compiling FreeFem3d uses unreasonable amount of time and memory

2007-01-13 Thread dberlin at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #22 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 01:22 --- Subject: Re: Compiling FreeFem3d uses unreasonable amount of time and memory okay, i'll update changelog, submit and commit. On 13 Jan 2007 23:02:13 -, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug driver/30460] New: asm_debug is not initialized in gcc.c

2007-01-13 Thread rschiele at uni-mannheim dot de
asm_debug is not initialized in gcc.c. This can lead to a sigsegv when using a custom specs file that does not overwrite asm_debug but other predefined spec values. Example: --- *invoke_as: %{!S:-o %|.s | nesc-as %(asm_options) %m.s %A } --- -- Summary: asm_debug is not

[Bug driver/30460] asm_debug is not initialized in gcc.c

2007-01-13 Thread rschiele at uni-mannheim dot de
--- Comment #1 from rschiele at uni-mannheim dot de 2007-01-14 01:56 --- Created an attachment (id=12903) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12903action=view) Fix for the problem. BTW: This is also true for 4.2.x and 4.1.x. I have not looked into older releases. --

[Bug driver/30460] asm_debug is not initialized in gcc.c

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 02:10 --- actually asm_debug is initialized in init_spec, with the following comment: /* Initialize here, not in definition. The IRIX 6 O32 cc sometimes chokes on ?: in file-scope variable initializations. */

[Bug driver/30460] asm_debug is not initialized in gcc.c

2007-01-13 Thread rschiele at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from rschiele at gmail dot com 2007-01-14 02:21 --- Andrew, it does not help to initialize in init_spec() because init_spec() is only called when there is _no_ spec file found. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30460

[Bug driver/30460] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] asm_debug is not initialized in gcc.c when using a specs file

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0.0 4.1.0 |

[Bug driver/30460] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] asm_debug is not initialized in gcc.c when using a specs file

2007-01-13 Thread rschiele at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from rschiele at gmail dot com 2007-01-14 03:12 --- What about just calling init_spec() _allways_ _before_ reading the default specs file instead of calling it only when there is no default specs file? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30460

[Bug libgcj/30454] [4.3 Regression] classpath/gnu/javax/crypto/jce/GnuCrypto.java:431: error: cannot find file for class gnu.javax.crypto.jce.mac.HMacSHA512Spi

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 03:44 --- This also happens on powerpc-darwin8.5. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/30434] wrong parse of exception declaration list in virtual functions with multiple inheritence

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 04:39 --- The specific wording in the C++ standard: 15.4/3 If a virtual function has an exception-specification, all declarations, including the definition, of any function that overrides that virtual function in any dirived

[Bug c++/30434] wrong parse of exception declaration list in virtual functions with multiple inheritence

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 04:46 --- Since in this case we have: struct a1 struct a2 both of which have virtualfunction with no exception-specification and then we have struct b : a1 struct c: a2 which have virtutalfunction with an

[Bug c/30439] Intended Behaviour? #include signal.h searches for signal.h in local directory

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 04:56 --- #include ... search starts here: /home/cbs/local/include . /usr/local/include /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/include /usr/include Are you sure you don't have any of the following env variables set

[Bug libgcj/30419] [4.3 Regression] libjava failed to build

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Summary|libjava failed to build |[4.3

[Bug middle-end/30442] Expanded array initialization can use memset builtin function

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 05:01 --- This is a bit complex, we could use a loop reroller to roll this into a loop and then transform that loop into memset for test1. For test2 it is simple and a patch was presented at last year's gcc summit (and I

[Bug middle-end/30443] [4.3 Regression] 4.3 internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 05:02 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/30438] Unused variable should raise warning with -Wunused

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 05:09 --- The variable is set but not read from. There is another bug about this for the C/C++ front-ends and a new option for this case instead of just using -Wunused. I would considered t in comment #1 as being used as it

[Bug libgcj/30448] libjava configure script mix up with .c / .java using gcj /gcc

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 05:11 --- I have not seen this before in my buildings. How did you configure gcc? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/30451] incorrect attributes in *movti_ppc64 of rs6000.md

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 05:21 --- I don't see why the attr type matters here as we always split it. Can you describe the case where something goes because of attr having the wrong type? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30451

[Bug fortran/30432] gfortran.dg/c_by_val_1.f fails on ia64-*-*, problem with %VAL

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 05:28 --- Hmmm, I wonder if ia64 is broken for the following C case: TU1.c: int f(); int g(int a, double c, int d) { return f(a, d); } TU2.c: int f(int a, double b) { return b; } the named agrument is defined by:

[Bug preprocessor/28227] valid #ifdef rejected

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 05:36 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/30451] incorrect attributes in *movti_ppc64 of rs6000.md

2007-01-13 Thread dkwan at transmeta dot com
--- Comment #3 from dkwan at transmeta dot com 2007-01-14 05:47 --- There is additional code for the CELL PPU to adjust the latencies of data and address operands of integer stores. The code requires accurate load/store attributes. I guess there is nothing in the main-line gcc that

[Bug fortran/30437] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] -Wno-all is rejected when fortran is included

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 05:49 --- This is actually caused by fortran/lang.opt which differs from c.opt in that it RejectNegative's. So if someone configures without fortran (Apple or you in this case), you will get -Wno-all but if you configure

[Bug middle-end/30403] [4.3 Regression] libssp/ssp.c:177: ICE: in cgraph_expand_function, at cgraphunit.c:973

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 05:58 --- I think this was already fixed by: r120577 | hubicka | 2007-01-08 03:18:40 -0800 (Mon, 08 Jan 2007) | 7 lines * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_process_new_functions): Reset reachable flag.

[Bug target/30413] %z produces ICE for char operands

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 06:02 --- Confirmed, not a regression. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/27962] [4.1 regression] ICE with invalid template parameter in specialization

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 06:05 --- (In reply to comment #8) Just like PR 27668, I cannot confirm this bug for 4.1.1 or the 4.1 branch; it passes for me. Unless something changed between 20061204 and now, I can reproduce this on the 4.1 branch:

[Bug fortran/30437] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] -Wno-all is rejected when fortran is included

2007-01-13 Thread chris dot pickett at mail dot mcgill dot ca
--- Comment #3 from chris dot pickett at mail dot mcgill dot ca 2007-01-14 06:06 --- I don't think that's the right explanation. cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -Wno-all ... --enable-languages=c ... gcc version 4.3.0 20070110 (experimental) Although fortran may have a

[Bug tree-optimization/30440] internal compiler error: in find_or_generate_expression, at tree-ssa-pre.c:1472

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 06:07 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28545 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/28545] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code for hoisted multiplication

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 06:07 --- *** Bug 30440 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30437] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] -Wno-all is rejected (even when fortran is not included)

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 06:13 --- (In reply to comment #3) Although fortran may have a RejectNegative---in this case it's being rejected without fortran---so it's a separate bug that fortran rejects -Wno-all, IMO. Not really. 4.0.4 fails the same

[Bug driver/30460] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] asm_debug is not initialized in gcc.c when using a default specs file

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 06:16 --- In my mind this is a minor issue because the way you are using the specs file is wrong, you are using the defaults spec file and not using the overriding one. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug target/30413] %z produces ICE for char operands

2007-01-13 Thread cnovikov at pacbell dot net
--- Comment #2 from cnovikov at pacbell dot net 2007-01-14 06:17 --- (In reply to comment #1) Confirmed, not a regression. You set keywords to ice-on-invalid-code. In my opinion, the code is valid. %z is supposed to add an appropriate data width IA-32 insn suffix: l for dwords, w

[Bug target/30413] %z produces ICE for char operands

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 06:34 --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) Confirmed, not a regression. You set keywords to ice-on-invalid-code. Maybe you are correct but I don't think %zN is documented anywhere. -- pinskia

[Bug c++/30423] compile with -O2 fails.

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30423

[Bug target/10127] -fstack-check let's program crash

2007-01-13 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 07:34 --- I do not see this crash with gcc 4.1.1. Is it still present? I did see it with 3.4.2. -fstack-check doesn't work on Linux/x86 and Linux/x86-64 without runtime support. Only the Ada compiler currently