https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
Bug ID: 63731
Summary: Fallback to netgo does not work
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63640
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #7 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
update:
CONFIG_SHELL=/usr/bin/ksh still fails at the start
CONFIG_SHELL=/opt/bin/bash (v4-30) complains, but moves on.
[ -f stage_final ] || echo stage3 stage_final
/opt/bin/bash:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63732
Bug ID: 63732
Summary: constexpr is not constant expression, when cast member
data pointer to data parent type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63733
Bug ID: 63733
Summary: [OOP] wrong resolution for OPERATOR generics
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63595
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Merged function by IPA ICF after expand_thunk is called:
Triangulationdim::raw_quad_iterator Triangulationdim::end_quad() const
[with int dim = 3; Triangulationdim::raw_quad_iterator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63650
--- Comment #8 from Richard PALO richard at netbsd dot org ---
(In reply to Richard PALO from comment #7)
Further testing indicates that 'cdecl' is okay and that keeping 'regparm(0)'
causes the error.
Is there perhaps a hint where I could
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734
Bug ID: 63734
Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-v8qi.c
-O2 (internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63614
Oliver Maurhart dyle at dyle dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #8 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
This ran MUCH better - thanks, but curious about what to do with
following messages (there where more than I could reverse scroll).
I forgot where I read about some systems having .o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63735
Bug ID: 63735
Summary: [5.0 regression] 5% code size regression since
2014/10/13
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #2 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
foo.c.optimized:
5.0:
;;prev block 0, next block 1, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
;;pred: ENTRY [100.0%] (FALLTHRU,EXECUTABLE)
# .MEM_4 = VDEF .MEM_3(D)
aD.1380 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63735
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63735
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'll try, but with build breakage as well, it may not prove very much.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
My first impression is that this is a target issue, we should be able to call
TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST_OK from gimple. Either the target should avoid
calling gen_reg_rtx when we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847
--- Comment #22 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #21)
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #20)
Created attachment 33858 [details]
Proposed patch
/* If the current locale is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #9 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
While I may yet find a bug - my apologies for not better understanding the
installation document.
I see there is a better mail-list (gcc-help) and shall request assistance via
that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I had not realized that Bash-isms had crept into Autoconf, but I am not
surprised. Using KSH to bootstrap is extremely slow and causes other problems.
Both Bull Freeware for AIX and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Do not use GNU Binutils on AIX 5.3 (or later). GNU assembler and GNU linker do
not work properly with recent releases of AIX. Installing GCC does not require
installing all parts of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #12 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
I can try them again, but all the additional rpms that installing gcc
requires tends to break things.
I try to make as few assumptions about an environment as possible
(such as bash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #13 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
As far as I know, GNU as and GNU ld have never been favored on AIX.
And, they are LAST in the PATH variable. In the initial attempts I had
read about the compare pass, that some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63736
Bug ID: 63736
Summary: gcc generated program with segfault on atomic exchange
when the atomic variable is a member of a struct
allocated with make_shared
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63736
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63736
--- Comment #1 from Leandro Santiago leandrosansilva at gmail dot com ---
I forgot to mention I am using Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit on a i7 machine and kernel
3.8.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
--- Comment #4 from Tavian Barnes tavianator at gmail dot com ---
Still happens with 4.9.2 though. Is a backport of the fix possible?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63735
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
regression is caused by the switch to GNU11. Adding -std=gnu90 gives expected
numbers.
That's a pretty big penalty for using GNU11 coding!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63737
Bug ID: 63737
Summary: Missed optimization: -ffixed-reg and unelided copies
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63735
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63737
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62289
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ISL 0.14 has been released, cf.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-11/msg00038.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63735
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yeah, all the changes are in the linux kernel module. It's only one component
of the benchmark (though probably the largest).
Adding -fgnu89-inline is also sufficient to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #14 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
Please accept my apologies for replying here, the gcc-help is not a high
traffic list today :) and I removed myself from the gcc-bugs list.
I checked out the BULL and Perlz sites
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
GNU as and GNU ld do not consistently generate correct object files and
executables on AIX. AIX 5.2, 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 continued to extend and adjust
the XCOFF object file format,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Bull Freeware provides GCC 4.8.1 for AIX 6.1. I do not know why they only
provide GCC 4.6.1 for AIX 7.1. AIX 5.3 no longer is supported by IBM and newer
features in GCC require
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63735
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed that the compilation time regression is related entirely to the extra
code generated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #17 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
The problem is not installing other tools. Of course I will do that. It is an
issue on AIX because will buildable they are not there by default. In a linux
stack they are nearly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63735
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
When I try 5.0 with -fno-tree-vectorize, I get:
;; basic block 2, loop depth 0
;;pred: ENTRY
# .MEM_4 = VDEF .MEM_3(D)
aD.2496 = *.LC0D.2503;
# VUSE .MEM_4
_10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
Bug ID: 63738
Summary: ssa corruption when compiled with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63640
--- Comment #2 from patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr ---
Thanks for the tip and the comment.
So the standard say that move_alloc deallocate the array from. Does that mean
that the compiler mark the array as not allocated but does not free
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63293
--- Comment #4 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jiwang
Date: Tue Nov 4 17:13:25 2014
New Revision: 217091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217091root=gccview=rev
Log:
[AArch64] fix unsafe access to deallocated stack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63293
Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63739
Bug ID: 63739
Summary: template id needed for constructor inheritance with
using keyword
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63739
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #13 from Aaro Koskinen aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi ---
Created attachment 33884
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33884action=edit
Preprocessed dl-conflict
Here's the preprocessed dl-conflict.c. In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792
--- Comment #11 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Hin-Tak Leung from comment #9)
Did the change make it into 4.9.2? I recently tried that
and found that I need the explicit --sysroot:
||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
||com
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
The same problem exists for gcc HEAD 5.0.0 20141104 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5 Regression] ssa |[4.9/5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
Bug ID: 63740
Summary: GCC 4.9.2 bootstrap fails on ARM,
haifa-sched.c:6507:1: internal compiler error: in
lra_create
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63732
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61887
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #2 from Aaro Koskinen aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi ---
Created attachment 33885
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33885action=edit
haifa-sched preprocessed source
This is the preprocessed source of haifa-sched
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63732
Pavel Král pavel.kral at omsquare dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63741
Bug ID: 63741
Summary: lm32 ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at
dwarf2cfi.c:1677
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
-lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141104 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515
--- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
The piece you're missing in this is that when we seen an assignment to some
SSA_NAME, call it LHS and we've traversed a backedge, then we have to walk
through all the equivalences and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63741
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.9.1
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63269
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792
--- Comment #12 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #10)
This change was reverted when Apple abandoned the idea of removing the
/usr/include. They didn't appreciate the number of packages
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63699
Andreas Tobler andreast at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63742
Bug ID: 63742
Summary: arm *movhi_insn_arch4 pattern may emit ldrh which is
wrong for big-endian
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63742
--- Comment #1 from Fei Yang fei.yang0953 at gmail dot com ---
A proposed patch for this issue:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00258.html
69 matches
Mail list logo
