[Bug tree-optimization/78317] "if (x & constant) z |= constant" should not be rendered with jumps and conditional moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78317 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||TREE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/78309] [7 Regression] ICE: in get_hash, at ipa-icf.c:2124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78309 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Summary|ICE: in

[Bug rtl-optimization/78325] [7 regression] r235825 causes gcc.target/mips/call-5.c, gcc.target/mips/call-6.c R_MIPS_JALR failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78325 --- Comment #1 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- NB the notes are added by `mips_legitimize_move'.

Re: Weird Error with Hashtable Code for Assignment(Maybe Compiler Bug)

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:30 PM, nick wrote: > Greetings Gcc Folks, > Either this is me doing something very simple in a school assignment for > creating a basic hashtable > or a compiler bug. I am currently seeing this error during my tables run on > copy constructor call

Weird Error with Hashtable Code for Assignment(Maybe Compiler Bug)

Greetings Gcc Folks, Either this is me doing something very simple in a school assignment for creating a basic hashtable or a compiler bug. I am currently seeing this error during my tables run on copy constructor call during the tester and have set to find out why it doesn't work. After some

[Bug tree-optimization/78327] Improve VRP for ranges for compares which do ranges of [-TYPE_MAX + N, N]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78327 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78327] Improve VRP for ranges of signed integers in the range [-TYPE_MAX + N, N]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78327 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- In your test case the int variable isn't in the [-TYPE_MAX + N, N] range which is the one that triggers the bug/limitation (that's why I'd like to keep it in the summary). The following test case shows the

[Bug preprocessor/78324] Valgrind issues seen with gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78324 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78330] New: incorrectly accepts invalid C++ code with shadowed template parameter

COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 2016 (experimental

[Bug tree-optimization/78327] Improve VRP for ranges of signed integers in the range [-TYPE_MAX + N, N]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78327 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- No it is only types < int. That is char and short. Please look at my test case and you will see that the one that does not work is only the char form.

[Bug tree-optimization/78327] Improve VRP for ranges of signed integers in the range [-TYPE_MAX + N, N]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78327 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Improve VRP for ranges of |Improve VRP for ranges of

[Bug tree-optimization/78327] Improve VRP for ranges of signed char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78327 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-Walloca-large-than false |Improve VRP for ranges of

[Bug c++/78329] New: incorrect debug info for return type deduction C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78329 Bug ID: 78329 Summary: incorrect debug info for return type deduction C++14 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/78328] wrong value in -Walloca-larger-than note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78328 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug middle-end/78328] New: wrong value in -Walloca-larger-than note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78328 Bug ID: 78328 Summary: wrong value in -Walloca-larger-than note Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/71225] [7 Regression] Overeager instantiation of members of non-template class nested in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71225] [7 Regression] Overeager instantiation of members of non-template class nested in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71225 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 11 23:42:25 2016 New Revision: 242328 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242328=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71225 * g++.dg/cpp0x/pr71225.C: New test. Added:

[Bug c++/71225] [7 Regression] Overeager instantiation of members of non-template class nested in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71225 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- r236486 turned the ICE into rejection: pr71225.C: In member function ‘void stride_view::adaptor::advance()’: pr71225.C:23:19: error: call of overloaded ‘clean()’ is ambiguous clean();

[Bug tree-optimization/78327] -Walloca-large-than false positives due to bad range info for signed integers in [-TYPE_MAX + N, N]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78327 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/59461] missed zero-extension elimination in the combiner

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59461 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/59461] missed zero-extension elimination in the combiner

inner REGs to paradoxical SUBREGs. (num_sign_bit_copies1) : Likewise. Check that the mode is not larger than a word before invoking LOAD_EXTEND_OP on it. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/2016-1.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/combine.c

[Bug fortran/25071] dummy argument larger than actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25071 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug sanitizer/78294] -fsanitize=thread broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78327] New: -Walloca-large-than false positives due to bad range info for signed integers in [-TYPE_MAX + N, N]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78327 Bug ID: 78327 Summary: -Walloca-large-than false positives due to bad range info for signed integers in [-TYPE_MAX + N, N] Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/78294] -fsanitize=thread broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- I've opened https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20805. It would be good if someone could come up with a small testcase.

[Bug libstdc++/78326] New: incorrect c++ usage in experimental/vector and others? _X_max_align is inaccessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78326 Bug ID: 78326 Summary: incorrect c++ usage in experimental/vector and others? _X_max_align is inaccessible Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/70890] [7 regression] r235660 miscompiles stage2 compiler on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70890 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78325] New: [7 regression] r235825 causes gcc.target/mips/call-5.c, gcc.target/mips/call-6.c R_MIPS_JALR failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78325 Bug ID: 78325 Summary: [7 regression] r235825 causes gcc.target/mips/call-5.c, gcc.target/mips/call-6.c R_MIPS_JALR failures Product: gcc Version: 7.0

[Bug ipa/78296] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c fails starting with r242032

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78296 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/78316] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c scan-ipa-dump-times cp "Setting value range of param 0 \\[-10, 9\\]" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78316 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/65892] gcc fails to implement N685 aliasing of union members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892 Davin McCall changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davmac at davmac dot org --- Comment #25

[Bug target/78243] incorrect byte offset in vextractuh with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78243 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78243] incorrect byte offset in vextractuh with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78243 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Nov 11 19:12:12 2016 New Revision: 242317 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242317=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-11 Michael Meissner PR

[Bug preprocessor/78324] New: Valgrind issues seen with gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78324 Bug ID: 78324 Summary: Valgrind issues seen with gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-2.c Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/78294] -fsanitize=thread broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Disassembly of libtsan.so.0.0.0: 0006efd0 <_ZN6__tsan10InitializeEPNS_11ThreadStateE>: if (is_initialized)

[Bug sanitizer/78294] -fsanitize=thread broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- OK, it looks like a ld.gold bug. I normally always use ld.gold on my system. However if I build gcc with ld.bfd then everything works fine.

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 04:49:49AM +, elizebethp at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 > > Elizebeth Punnoose changed: > Hi Elizebeth, Just an administrative

[Bug c++/78323] New: pathological code generation for long logical expression with temporary objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78323 Bug ID: 78323 Summary: pathological code generation for long logical expression with temporary objects Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/78322] New: Debug info still present for fully optimized away functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78322 Bug ID: 78322 Summary: Debug info still present for fully optimized away functions Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/78264] [7 regression] ICE in build_noexcept_spec, at cp/except.c:1196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i386-pc-solaris2.12,|i386-pc-solaris2.12,

[Bug debug/78321] New: Fission + type units + compression are suboptimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78321 Bug ID: 78321 Summary: Fission + type units + compression are suboptimal Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug debug/78320] New: Excess debug info -fdebug-types-section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78320 Bug ID: 78320 Summary: Excess debug info -fdebug-types-section Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug c++/78264] [7 regression] ICE in build_noexcept_spec, at cp/except.c:1196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez

[Bug sanitizer/78294] -fsanitize=thread broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Vyukov --- Markus, how do you configure and build gcc? Is there anything special? Our tls accesses should not go through __tls_get_addr because we use initial-exec attribute. __tls_get_addr vs indirect access through

[Bug sanitizer/77823] [7 Regression] ICE: in ubsan_encode_value, at ubsan.c:137 with -fsanitize=undefined and vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77823 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40029 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40029=edit ubsan-pr77823.patch Completely untested patch to allow libubsan handling vector types. Though, not sure if it

[Bug rtl-optimization/78120] [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120 --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #0) > typedef unsigned long u64; > > typedef struct { > u64 hi, lo; > } u128; > > static inline u128 add_u128 (u128 a, u128 b) > { > a.lo += b.lo; > if (a.lo <

[Bug rtl-optimization/78120] [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt --- Sorry James, I think these two got mixed up in my memory. I've attached a candidate patch I'm testing. This tries to make a better effort to calculate before/after costs for the speed case so we don't rely

[Bug rtl-optimization/78120] [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt --- Created attachment 40028 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40028=edit Candidate patch

[Bug fortran/50438] [F03] proc pointer to subroutine in structure constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50438 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The patch in comment 5 regtests cleanly. However, it only fixes comment 1 > but not comment 0. Any progress?

[Bug fortran/25071] dummy argument larger than actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25071 --- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Any opinions on this? So far 2 for, 0 against. May be the patch can be committed?

[Bug c++/56480] Explicit specialization in a namespace enclosing the specialized template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/78310] ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints: {*bmi2_rorxdi3_1} with -mbmi2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78310 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78310] ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints: {*bmi2_rorxdi3_1} with -mbmi2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78310 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Nov 11 17:04:18 2016 New Revision: 242124 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242124=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78310 * config/i386/i386.md (rotate to rotatex

[Bug ipa/78316] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c scan-ipa-dump-times cp "Setting value range of param 0 \\[-10, 9\\]" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78316 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78310] ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints: {*bmi2_rorxdi3_1} with -mbmi2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78310 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Nov 11 16:42:54 2016 New Revision: 242077 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242077=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78310 * config/i386/i386.md (rotate to rotatex

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] New: PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 Bug ID: 78319 Summary: PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/78310] ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints: {*bmi2_rorxdi3_1} with -mbmi2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78310 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Nov 11 16:21:52 2016 New Revision: 242076 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242076=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78310 * config/i386/i386.md (rotate to rotatex

[Bug testsuite/78318] New: FAIL: g++.dg/pr78112.C scan-assembler-times DW_AT_object_pointer 37

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78318 Bug ID: 78318 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/pr78112.C scan-assembler-times DW_AT_object_pointer 37 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/78120] [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/78317] "if (x & constant) z |= constant" should not be rendered with jumps and conditional moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78317 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Bug 9814 but that was marked as fixed

[Bug c/78317] "if (x & constant) z |= constant" should not be rendered with jumps and conditional moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78317 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c/78317] New: "if (x & constant) z |= constant" should not be rendered with jumps and conditional moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78317 Bug ID: 78317 Summary: "if (x & constant) z |= constant" should not be rendered with jumps and conditional moves Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/78316] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c scan-ipa-dump-times cp "Setting value range of param 0 \\[-10, 9\\]" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78316 --- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- The gcc is configured as: configure --target=aarch64-none-elf --prefix=... --with-gmp=... --with-mpfr=... --with-mpc=... --with-isl=... --with-pkgversion=unknown --disable-shared --disable-nls

[Bug ipa/78316] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c scan-ipa-dump-times cp "Setting value range of param 0 \\[-10, 9\\]" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78316 Bug ID: 78316 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c scan-ipa-dump-times cp "Setting value range of param 0 \\[-10, 9\\]" 1 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/78309] ICE: in get_hash, at ipa-icf.c:2124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78309 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Yes, your patch seems to fix the issue. Thanks.

[Bug libfortran/78314] [aarch64] ieee_support_halting does not report unsupported fpu traps correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/78315] New: "Changes" don't explain what "LRA" is

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78315 Bug ID: 78315 Summary: "Changes" don't explain what "LRA" is Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web

[Bug ipa/78309] ICE: in get_hash, at ipa-icf.c:2124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78309 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 40024 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40024=edit Un-tested patch Can you please Markus test the attached patch?

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Also on arm/aarch64. Also on x86_64-apple-darwin16.

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/78292] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-2.c fails starting with r241967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78292 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Fri Nov 11 14:59:48 2016 New Revision: 242073 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242073=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite PR testsuite/78292 *

[Bug libfortran/78314] [aarch64] ieee_support_halting does not report unsupported fpu traps correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- No wonder that one fails on thunderx.

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Confirmed provided I run genfixes in the fixincludes directory. For the record, note that configuring gcc with --disable-libsanitizer replace an ICE with accept-invalid in pr44348.

[Bug fortran/44348] ICE in build_function_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44348 --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I cannot confirm that. I do see the ICE on comment 2 at r242066. OK. I have "recovered" the ICE with the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg01045.html (pr78267). AFAICT the ICE

[Bug libfortran/78314] New: [aarch64] ieee_support_halting does not report unsupported fpu traps correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314 Bug ID: 78314 Summary: [aarch64] ieee_support_halting does not report unsupported fpu traps correctly Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/78114] [7 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78114 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- > But for tests: > FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f -O scan-tree-dump-times > pcom > "Executing predictive commoning

[Bug c++/78313] [7 Regression] Misleading spelling suggestion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78313 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Thanks. Has some similarities to PR 77922.

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #6) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > > (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #4) > > > But LLVM doesn't support shared UBSan runtime (the only one

[Bug c++/78313] [7 Regression] Misleading spelling suggestion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78313 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug c++/78313] New: [7 Regression] Misleading spelling suggestion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78313 Bug ID: 78313 Summary: [7 Regression] Misleading spelling suggestion Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #4) > > But LLVM doesn't support shared UBSan runtime (the only one supported is > > ASan) and AFAIK there aren't any

[Bug c++/72774] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘tree_list’ in consider_binding_level, at cp/name-loo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72774 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #4) > But LLVM doesn't support shared UBSan runtime (the only one supported is > ASan) and AFAIK there aren't any plans to support it there. Yeah, it is a very

[Bug c++/72774] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘tree_list’ in consider_binding_level, at cp/name-loo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72774 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 11 13:39:06 2016 New Revision: 242070 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242070=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/72774 * g++.dg/parse/pr72774.C: New test. Added:

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Sure, it doesn't affect gcc emitted code unless somebody calls those > directly, but perhaps say llvm compiled code using the shared libubsan.so. But LLVM

[Bug inline-asm/78311] "register value used as expression" on i386 in inline assembly statement with "o" constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78311 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 --- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 40023 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40023=edit i386-pc-solaris2.12 assembler output: pr78112.s Unfortunately, the new testcase FAILs on both Solaris/SPARC and

[Bug rtl-optimization/78120] [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt --- The other issue here seems to be simply that BRANCH_COST is 0 for predictable branches on x86. Which makes the default implementation of the hook used here if_info.max_seq_cost =

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Sure, it doesn't affect gcc emitted code unless somebody calls those directly, but perhaps say llvm compiled code using the shared libubsan.so. In any case, we shouldn't be making ABI incompatible changes

[Bug tree-optimization/78312] [7 Regression] wrong code probably due to VRP of multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78312 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Hmm. > > So [0, 1] * ~[1, 65534] gets > > MEET ([0, 1] * [0, 0] == [0, 0], > [0, 1] * [65535, 65535] == ~[1, 65534]) == ~[1, 65534] > > that looks ok to

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- I can't tell. I was just looking at symbol difference in the library, like using the abigail tools.

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/78312] [7 Regression] wrong code probably due to VRP of multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78312 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77346] [7 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- Nope, still can't reproduce. Can you run your compile line with -v and post the results, to see if there are any other flags passed to cc1 that I am unaware of?

[Bug rtl-optimization/78120] [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt --- Gah, that's obviously bogus and fails elsewhere. Still looking...

[Bug target/78310] ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints: {*bmi2_rorxdi3_1} with -mbmi2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78310 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/72774] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘tree_list’ in consider_binding_level, at cp/name-loo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72774 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, and I've fixed it already in r240148. I'll check the testcase in and close.

[Bug middle-end/78295] [7 Regression] Spurious -Wuninitialized warning for vector element assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78295 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71575] [6 Regression] [graphite] internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2500

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7

[Bug tree-optimization/71575] [6/7 Regression] [graphite] internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2500

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Nov 11 12:54:25 2016 New Revision: 242069 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242069=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-11 Richard Biener PR

  1   2   >