http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55064
Bug #: 55064
Summary: ice in df_get_live_out
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55104
Bug #: 55104
Summary: ice in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:269
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55106
Bug #: 55106
Summary: ice: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is
achieved (15)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55208
Bug #: 55208
Summary: ice in remove_redundant_iv_tests, at
tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c:478
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55191
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2012-11-04
20:05:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Dup of 55176.
I don't see the connection.
One is an OOM, the other is an ICE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
--- Comment #11 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-02-06
18:47:37 UTC ---
It isn't that easy. For %'s you really have to parse all the characters after
% and figure out where the format specifier ends.
Agreed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
--- Comment #12 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-02-07
21:19:15 UTC ---
I coded up some of my ideas into the attached C++ source code.
Then I modified builtins.c and did a bootstrap.
My small patch seems to be working
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
--- Comment #13 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-02-07
21:21:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 29391
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29391
C++ source code
This code doesn't understand all sprintf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
--- Comment #14 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-02-14
19:06:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 29453
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29453
C++ source code
Old version understood about a dozen formats
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
--- Comment #15 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-03-08
08:48:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 29615
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29615
C++ source code
This one now understands 40 common formats
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51544
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-03-09
20:07:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I've been trying to bootstrap using -g -O3 in BOOT_CFLAGS.
That doesn't work, but -g -O2 of course does.
I am pleased
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56639
Bug #: 56639
Summary: ice in cp_parser_late_return_type_opt
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56642
Bug #: 56642
Summary: ice in backtrace_dwarf_add
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56642
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-03-17
17:59:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 29684
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29684
gzipped C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56639
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-03-17
21:10:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 29685
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29685
gzipped C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56690
Bug #: 56690
Summary: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in
verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1008
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56690
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56681
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56854
Bug #: 56854
Summary: error: non-decl/MEM_REF LHS in clobber statement
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56854
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-04-06
09:45:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 29813
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29813
gzipped C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57026
Bug #: 57026
Summary: ice: SSA corruption
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57036
Bug #: 57036
Summary: ice in update_ssa_across_abnormal_edges
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57075
Bug #: 57075
Summary: verify_flow_info failed: control flow in the middle of
basic block
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57107
Bug #: 57107
Summary: tree check fail in unlink_stmt_vdef
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57107
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-04-29
08:08:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 29969
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29969
gzipped C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57140
Bug #: 57140
Summary: Segmentation fault in backtrace_dwarf_add
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57190
Bug #: 57190
Summary: verify_ssa failed: SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI
should be set
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53050
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57214
Bug #: 57214
Summary: ice: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst
in coalesce_partitions, at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1194
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57214
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-05-08
15:56:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 30059
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30059
C source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57215
Bug #: 57215
Summary: cc1plus causes possible glibc free corruption
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57216
Bug #: 57216
Summary: error: definition in block 255 does not dominate use
in block 252
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 30123
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30123action=edit
C source code
I just tried to compile the package plymouth-0.8.9-0.2013.03.26.0
on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130515 on an AMD
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639
--- Comment #7 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2012-04-24 18:08:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Supposedly fixed by
2012-04-10 Ulrich Weigand ulrich.weig...@linaro.org
PR tree-optimization/52870
* tree-vect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53105
Bug #: 53105
Summary: Segmentation fault in is_gimple_min_invariant
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53131
Bug #: 53131
Summary: -Wlogical-op: ready for prime time in -Wall ?
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53131
--- Comment #2 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2012-04-28 07:29:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
I am somewhat surprised that -Wlogical-op isn't part of either -Wall
or possibly -Wextra.
It could
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53153
Bug #: 53153
Summary: ice in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6569
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53131
--- Comment #5 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2012-04-28 12:17:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Could you give a sample? -Wlogical-op merges 2 unrelated warnings:
*) x 2 (you would expect a boolean, not 2, so maybe x2 was meant)
*) x0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53161
Bug #: 53161
Summary: index domain error, in ipa_remove_reference at
ipa-ref.c:84
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53161
--- Comment #1 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2012-04-29 20:15:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 27262
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27262
gzipped C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53245
Bug #: 53245
Summary: ice in expand_case
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53336
Bug #: 53336
Summary: invalid types in nop conversion
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50606
--- Comment #2 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2012-05-14 18:24:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
printf warnings are handled in the FE, so we would need constant-propagation
in
the FE. Clang implements it, so I know it is possible.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53702
Bug #: 53702
Summary: Segmentation fault with -Wall
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53703
Bug #: 53703
Summary: verify_ssa: definition in block 105 does not dominate
use in block 103
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53748
Bug #: 53748
Summary: ice in fold_convert_loc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53749
Bug #: 53749
Summary: ice in expand_shift_1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53752
Bug #: 53752
Summary: ice in write_array_type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53752
--- Comment #1 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2012-06-23 08:22:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 27689
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27689
gzipped C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53809
Bug #: 53809
Summary: ice then Abort
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53809
--- Comment #1 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2012-06-29 19:04:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 27717
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27717
gzipped C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53809
dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49569
dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881
Bug #: 53881
Summary: ice in emit_case_bit_tests
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2012-07-22
19:01:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 27854
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27854
C source code
Flag -O2 required. The compiler said
ui.c:7157:1: internal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
I just out the source code from bug report # 49926 on the compiler
from 24 May 2013.
[dcb@localhost testsuite]$ ~/gcc/results/bin/gcc -c -g -O2
gcc.dg/vect/pr49926.c
[dcb@localhost testsuite]$ ~/gcc/results/bin/gcc -c -g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57418
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
The attached source code causes the following crash
on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130530 on an AMD x86_64 box
when compiled with -O3.
[dcb@localhost foundBugs]$ ../results/bin/gcc -c -O2 !$
../results/bin/gcc -c -O2 bug107.c
[dcb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57478
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 30231
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30231action=edit
C source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57447
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
I see this problem also.
Additional test case available on request.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 30265
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30265action=edit
C source code
The attached source code causes the following crash
on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130605 on an AMD x86_64 box
when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30604
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57447
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 30270
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30270action=edit
C++ source code
The attached source code causes the following crash
on gcc-4.9 trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
--- Comment #16 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 30287
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30287action=edit
C++ source code
Latest version understands NUM1.NUM2, 53 formatting specifiers
: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 30289
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30289action=edit
gzipped C source code
The attached source code causes the following crash
on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130605
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30604
--- Comment #17 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16)
Can you open a new bugreport please? It's very likely a different
reason than this one.
After a lot of fiddling about, please
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
I just ran the static analysis tool cppcheck over
the trunk source code dated 20130623.
It said
[trunk/gcc/cp/cp-array-notation.c:471] -
[trunk/gcc/cp/cp-array-notation.c:473]: (warning) Variable 'init
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314
: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 30347
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30347action=edit
C++ source code
I just noticed that -march=native support broke from
date 20130621 to 20130623 for AMD
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57688
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #1)
Run it in gdb, wait for the fault, and disassemble the code around the
faulting PC. That valgrind report doesn't really say
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57688
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 30348
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30348action=edit
preprocessed C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57688
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
Can you provide the full output of cat /proc/cpuinfo and not just the head?
processor: 0
vendor_id: AuthenticAMD
cpu family
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57688
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
Also, for any bugreport with -march=native or -mtune=native you need to
specify what options have been passed to cc1plus/cc1 (add -v
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
I just ran the static analysis checker cppcheck over the source code
of trunk 20130710. It said
Checking trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c...
[trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:12465] - [trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:12468]: (warning)
Variable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Still fails on 20130710.
Another test case that generates the same message is available on request.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57880
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2)
Ed?
He's had eleven days to think about it and said nothing.
I'd be happy to supply the obvious patch.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 30540
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30540action=edit
C source code
I just tried to compile the attached code with -O0. Over 4 Gig of RAM
seemed to be required to compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57880
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 30545
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30545action=edit
source code patch
This patch seems to shut up cppcheck.
I did a bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57880
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #4)
For a quicker review, I would recommend CC-ing Jason and adding [C++ Patch]
to the subject line.
I'm not on the inner wheel for C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57880
--- Comment #12 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #11)
Fixed for 4.9.0.
Good news. Worth referencing the patch that fixed it ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Some code has obvious resource leaks
# include stdio.h
void f1(const char *str)
{
FILE * fp = fopen(str, r);
char buf[10];
while (fgets(buf, 10, fp) != NULL)
{
/* Do something
: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 30705
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30705action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
I just tried to compile package omniORB-4.1.6-5.fc20 with gcc 4.9 trunk dated
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 30739
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30739action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
I just tried to compile package 0ad-0.0.13-8
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 30785
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30785action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
I just tried to compile package k3d-0.8.0.2-19 with gcc 4.9 trunk
dated 20130909. It said
/home/dcb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58380
--- Comment #9 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #7)
Presumably David bootstrapped the trunk, then built k3d?
Yes, the bootstrap ran fine with the usual -g -O2 on BOOT_CFLAGS
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 30868
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30868action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
I just tried to compile package oxygen-gtk2-1.4.0 with gcc 4.9 trunk
dated 20130917. It said
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 30896
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30896action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
I just tried to compile package activemq-cpp-3.7.1-1 with gcc 4.9 trunk
dated 20130925. It said
: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
I just tried to bootstrap gcc 4.9 trunk dated
20130925 on an AMD Phenom with BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3.
It failed, but on checking the difference between
-O2 and -O3, I got the following setting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
How exactly did it fail for you?
I tried
../src/trunk/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results --enable-checking=yes
--enable
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 30919
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30919action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
I just tried to compile package flamerobin-0.9.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
I just tried the following code on trunk 20140720
extern int g(int);
void f( int n)
{
int i;
i = g( n) 0x02;
if (i == 1)
g( 2);
}
$ ~/gcc/results/bin/gcc -c -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61867
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
I'm pretty sure gcc does detect it and optimizes appropriately, it just
doesn't warn.
I've checked the output from using -S and I
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 33201
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33201action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
For the attached code, compiled with trunk dated 20140727,
built with --enable
201 - 300 of 2874 matches
Mail list logo
