[Bug bootstrap/54128] [4.8 Regression] GCC does not bootstrap on little endian mips due to mis-compare on tree-data-ref.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22 23:06:42 UTC --- Can you please attach random.i and what exact gcc options were used to compile random.c ?

[Bug inline-asm/55775] [4.8 Regression] ICE when building pari

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55775 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug java/55764] [4.8 Regression] ICE when building frysk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55764 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug tree-optimization/55831] ICE: verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55831 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/55831] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55831 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/55831] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55831 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-31 15:24:29 UTC --- Though, with (a = a + 1) instead of a++ it started ICEing with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167378 or http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root

[Bug tree-optimization/55831] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55831 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-31 23:50:06 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 31 23:50:00 2012 New Revision: 194764 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194764 Log: PR tree

[Bug tree-optimization/55831] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55831 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/55844] -fsanitize=address -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -m64 doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55844 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 07:30:55 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01179.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/55838] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn (unrecognizable insn) with -O -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug middle-end/55832] [4.8 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1967

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55832 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug sanitizer/55561] TSAN: Fortran/OMP yields false positives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561 --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 09:43:29 UTC --- The formatting in the patch is wrong (multiple issues). I don't see a point in the __atomic_load_n (addr, MEMMODEL_RELAXED), for aligned ints

[Bug middle-end/23868] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] builtin_apply uses wrong mode for multi-hard-register return values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4

[Bug sanitizer/55844] -fsanitize=address -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -m64 doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55844 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 21:07:21 UTC --- Could you please do an extra merge soon, even before switching the default? You've raised some cases where on ubuntu _Unwind_* based backtrace wasn't

[Bug middle-end/55198] [4.8 Regression] libquadmath/math/fmaq.c:233:7: internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55198 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 08:52:17 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 3 08:52:10 2013 New Revision: 194834 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194834 Log: PR debug

[Bug middle-end/55832] [4.8 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1967

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55832 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 09:02:51 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 3 09:02:41 2013 New Revision: 194836 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194836 Log: PR tree

[Bug rtl-optimization/55838] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn (unrecognizable insn) with -O -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 09:05:49 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 3 09:05:43 2013 New Revision: 194837 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194837 Log: PR rtl

[Bug middle-end/55832] [4.8 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1967

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55832 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/55838] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn (unrecognizable insn) with -O -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/55851] [4.8 Regression] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug inline-asm/55864] Optimization cause asm code to wrong behaviour

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55864 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/55851] [4.8 Regression] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/55866] New: [4.8 Regression] #include auto_ptr.h in C++11 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55866 Bug #: 55866 Summary: [4.8 Regression] #include auto_ptr.h in C++11 mode Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/55866] [4.8 Regression] #include auto_ptr.h in C++11 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55866 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55875] New: [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875 Bug #: 55875 Summary: [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/55875] [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/55875] [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 12:24:12 UTC --- ssa name _12 type long unsigned int base 4294967295 step 1 ssa name _13 type long unsigned int base 34359738360 step 8 ssa name _14

[Bug c++/55877] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Anon visibility issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877 Bug #: 55877 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Anon visibility issues Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/55877] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Anon visibility issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4

[Bug c/25702] feature request: generate a warning for sizeof on a pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25702 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug c++/55877] [4.6 Regression] Anon visibility issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 17:07:55 UTC --- The reason for listing 4.6 was that the PR54883 change has been applied to 4.6 branch fairly recently, making it for the enum case a recent 4.6 regression

[Bug fortran/55852] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in gfc_build_intrinsic_call, at fortran/expr.c:4647

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/55878] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes rejection of typeid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55878 Bug #: 55878 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes rejection of typeid Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/55594] [4.8 Regression] -Wa,-nH incorrectly added to compile line of all targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 12:55:39 UTC --- But that is not a requirement. The requirement is using a C++ compiler that works out of the box (compiler configured in a path where its shared

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/55894] No constant propagation in Intel intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 14:51:26 UTC --- I don't see any differences in assembly, when I compile either version of random.i with -std=gnu99 -fcx-fortran-rules -g -O2 with a r189365 vs. r189366

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 16:34:14 UTC --- Ah, ok, seems indeed to be HWI size related and also (due to an earlier bug) related to the revision you've mentioned. So, with an i686-linux

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 17:27:56 UTC --- Created attachment 29100 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29100 gcc48-pr54120.patch So, I wrote a fix against r189366, only

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 08:13:02 UTC --- On HP-UX or Linux? The test is guarded with ! { dg-require-effective-target tls_runtime } does the OS have assembly/linker and runtime TLS support

[Bug sanitizer/55844] -fsanitize=address -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -m64 doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55844 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 08:14:12 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 8 08:14:04 2013 New Revision: 195005 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195005 Log: PR sanitizer

[Bug middle-end/55851] [4.8 Regression] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 08:32:21 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 8 08:32:12 2013 New Revision: 195006 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195006 Log: PR middle

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 08:33:50 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 8 08:33:43 2013 New Revision: 195007 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195007 Log: PR tree

[Bug tree-optimization/55890] [4.7 Regression] calling a builtin func through a cast triggers an ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 08:38:58 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 8 08:38:50 2013 New Revision: 195008 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195008 Log: PR middle-end

[Bug sanitizer/55844] -fsanitize=address -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -m64 doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55844 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/55851] [4.8 Regression] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55868] [4.8 Regression] gfortran generates for CLASS(*) __m_MOD___vtab__$tar on NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL systems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55868 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug fortran/55868] [4.8 Regression] gfortran generates for CLASS(*) __m_MOD___vtab__$tar on NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL systems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55868 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 09:41:29 UTC --- Fine with me. Just a note, sprintf (dt_name, %s, STAR); would be better written as strcpy (dt_name, STAR);

[Bug rtl-optimization/55829] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3069 with -msse3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 09:58:05 UTC --- Created attachment 29103 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29103 gcc48-pr55829.patch Yeah, comparing the vec_dupv2df

[Bug rtl-optimization/55829] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3069 with -msse3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug pch/54117] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug pch/54117] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 11:27:12 UTC --- The problem is that dbxout.c (unlike dwarf2out.c; not sure about other debug backends) emits assembly immediately into asm_out_file, pretty much

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug pch/54117] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 12:42:06 UTC --- dbxout.c already defines a handle_pch hook, so it is apparently told when pch_init and write_pch are called, so in theory this could be handled

[Bug pch/54117] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 13:28:56 UTC --- Note this isn't limited to dbxout.c, pretty much all *out.c debug backends but dwarf2out.c suffer from these issues, they all emit assembly immediately

[Bug c++/55893] [4.7/4.8 Regression][C++11] runtime segfault with static const object with virtual destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55893 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug c/48418] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Bit shift operator =

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48418 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 14:44:51 UTC --- Created attachment 29104 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29104 gcc48-pr48418.patch Untested fix. To avoid warning twice

[Bug tree-optimization/48189] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: SIGFPE (division by zero) in in predict_loops () at predict.c:991 with --param max-predicted-iterations=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48189 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 15:02:52 UTC --- Created attachment 29105 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29105 gcc48-pr48189.patch I'd say this isn't difficult to solve enough

[Bug rtl-optimization/48181] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fgcse --param ira-max-conflict-table-size=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48181 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 15:16:52 UTC --- But then, won't the exact same issues potentially happen in very large functions where ira_conflicts_p isn't also true, because the conflict table would

[Bug fortran/55341] address-sanitizer and Fortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341 --- Comment #48 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 17:02:13 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 8 17:01:58 2013 New Revision: 195025 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195025 Log: PR fortran

[Bug fortran/55341] address-sanitizer and Fortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug pch/54117] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 17:51:10 UTC --- All that to avoid one #include output.h in one file? That doesn't seem appropriate to me. I'm not questioning it is a desirable change, but I'd

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] [4.8 Regression] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 18:00:30 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 8 18:00:10 2013 New Revision: 195028 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195028 Log: PR rtl

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] [4.8 Regression] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55875] [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 18:27:44 UTC --- FYI, the execute/pr55875.c with -O1 started failing with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138207 aka tuples merge.

[Bug tree-optimization/48189] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: SIGFPE (division by zero) in in predict_loops () at predict.c:991 with --param max-predicted-iterations=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48189 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09 09:00:32 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 9 09:00:22 2013 New Revision: 195046 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195046 Log: PR tree

[Bug tree-optimization/48189] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGFPE (division by zero) in in predict_loops () at predict.c:991 with --param max-predicted-iterations=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48189 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0

[Bug fortran/55916] New: Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 Bug #: 55916 Summary: Alignment issues with real(16) on i686 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/48418] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Bit shift operator =

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48418 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09 14:51:17 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 9 14:51:09 2013 New Revision: 195051 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195051 Log: PR c/48418

[Bug c/48418] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Bit shift operator =

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48418 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug tree-optimization/55875] [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55875] [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09 16:35:13 UTC --- Yes, but I'd say under a different PR.

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug rtl-optimization/55829] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3069 with -msse3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/55921] Crash in verify_ssa for asm to side-steps complex pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/55921] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Crash in verify_ssa for asm to side-steps complex pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/55921] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Crash in verify_ssa for asm to side-steps complex pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/55921] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Crash in verify_ssa for asm to side-steps complex pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-10 09:25:27 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 10 09:25:12 2013 New Revision: 195080 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195080 Log: PR tree

[Bug middle-end/55921] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Crash in verify_ssa for asm to side-steps complex pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7

[Bug inline-asm/55934] New: [4.8 Regression] LRA inline asm error recovery

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55934 Bug #: 55934 Summary: [4.8 Regression] LRA inline asm error recovery Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug inline-asm/55934] [4.8 Regression] LRA inline asm error recovery

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55934 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error

[Bug tree-optimization/32306] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] redundant || not eliminated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug sanitizer/55561] TSAN: Fortran/OMP yields false positives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561 --- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-10 11:37:08 UTC --- For config/posix it is not that easy, because you can't assume that atomics are available. You'd need to guard it with #ifdef HAVE_SYNC_BUILTINS and do

[Bug fortran/55935] [OOP] Fortran fronted has ADDR_EXPRs of FUNCTION_DECLs with bogus BLOCK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55935 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug tree-optimization/52448] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] cselim broken with calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52448 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-10 16:49:26 UTC --- Any progress with this?

[Bug fortran/55935] [OOP] Fortran fronted has ADDR_EXPRs of FUNCTION_DECLs with bogus BLOCK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55935 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/55935] [OOP] Fortran fronted has ADDR_EXPRs of FUNCTION_DECLs with bogus BLOCK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55935 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-11 10:03:09 UTC --- Created attachment 29143 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29143 gcc48-pr55935.patch Or alternative patch that ensures in the FE

[Bug rtl-optimization/55672] [4.8 Regression] -fstack-check=generic ICEs in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:13868

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/53342] [4.8 Regression] rnflow.f90 is ~5% slower after revision 187340

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-11 11:52:59 UTC --- Created attachment 29144 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29144 hackish attempt

[Bug inline-asm/55934] [4.8 Regression] LRA inline asm error recovery

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55934 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-11 12:59:33 UTC --- Please also consider asm goto like: void bar (int); void foo (_Complex float x) { asm volatile goto ( : : x (x) : : foo); /* { dg-error

[Bug fortran/55935] [OOP] Fortran fronted has ADDR_EXPRs of FUNCTION_DECLs with bogus BLOCK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55935 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-11 14:40:45 UTC --- Created attachment 29148 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29148 gimple-fold Alternative to alternative

[Bug target/55941] [4.8 Regression] Strange copy of double (in struct) to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55941 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/55941] [4.8 Regression] Strange copy of double (in struct) to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55941 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth

[Bug debug/55608] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Debug info quality regressions with file scope vars

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55608 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/54392] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] std::string::assign() fails to update length

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54392 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >