[Bug middle-end/50199] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code with -flto -fno-merge-constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-11 17:04:45 UTC --- I'd very much prefer to keep PR54971 fix in. As for #c3, I believe it would be enough to test the mode, so perhaps tree repl

[Bug target/55947] non constant memory models lose HLE qualifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55947 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug tree-optimization/55949] __builtin_object_size size passed to memcpy_chk is incorrect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55949 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug tree-optimization/55955] [4.8 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at optabs.c:402

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55955 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug bootstrap/55957] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap error in prop_value_t evaluate_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55957 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13 11:29:13 UTC --- Yeah, what bootstrap compiler are you using? And are you sure your tree is in consistent state? $ grep gimple_call_builtin_p gimple.h extern bool

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug fortran/55935] [OOP] Fortran fronted has ADDR_EXPRs of FUNCTION_DECLs with bogus BLOCK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55935 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13 12:33:49 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sun Jan 13 12:33:43 2013 New Revision: 195136 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195136 Log: PR fortran

[Bug fortran/55935] [OOP] Fortran fronted has ADDR_EXPRs of FUNCTION_DECLs with bogus BLOCK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55935 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55955] [4.8 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at optabs.c:402

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55955 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3

[Bug tree-optimization/55964] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault with -O -ftree-loop-distribution -funswitch-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55964 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/55955] [4.8 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at optabs.c:402

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55955 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.3 |4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/55955] [4.8 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at optabs.c:402

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55955 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/55967] rightshift an unsigned value (X) by it's number of bits does not always yield 0, when X is an unsigned that's leftshifted by it's number of bits and offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/48766] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Infinite recursion in fold_binary_loc()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48766 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 14:24:32 UTC --- Created attachment 29161 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29161 gcc48-pr48766.patch Untested fix. Seems in the previous option

[Bug middle-end/50199] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code with -flto -fno-merge-constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 14:55:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) I'm not sure this isn't an issue without LTO though (possibly way harder to trigger though). I don't see how. -fno

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug middle-end/55943] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in gen_reg_rtx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55943 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug tree-optimization/48766] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Infinite recursion in fold_binary_loc()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48766 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug preprocessor/55971] Preprocessor macros with C++11 raw string literals fail to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55971 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug tree-optimization/53342] [4.8 Regression] rnflow.f90 is ~5% slower after revision 187340

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 16:45:11 UTC --- Can't we then compute the final values of the bases after the peeling loop, and add those gimplified after the peeling loop, then use them in the next

[Bug preprocessor/55971] Preprocessor macros with C++11 raw string literals fail to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55971 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 18:25:41 UTC --- I guess if for multiversioning you want the two decls to be independent, like overloaded functions with different argument types are, then IMHO the mv

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 18:32:44 UTC --- Actually, what you'd merge is everything as usually if mv attribute isn't on either of the decls, or if mv attribute is present on either one, and both

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 20:23:54 UTC --- That wouldn't work, because you would then have the default (non-mv) version, possibly mv version with no target attribute, and then some other mv

[Bug c/55967] rightshift an unsigned value (X) by it's number of bits does not always yield 0, when X is an unsigned that's leftshifted by it's number of bits and offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 07:55:06 UTC --- Please google around on undefined behavior, you'll find various FAQs about it. When a program triggers undefined behavior, anything can happen

[Bug tree-optimization/48766] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Infinite recursion in fold_binary_loc()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48766 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 08:17:09 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 15 08:16:56 2013 New Revision: 195186 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195186 Log: PR tree

[Bug tree-optimization/48766] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Infinite recursion in fold_binary_loc()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48766 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0

[Bug c++/55988] Incorrect code generation with const and -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55988 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/55893] [4.7/4.8 Regression][C++11] runtime segfault with static const object with virtual destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55893 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug tree-optimization/55955] [4.8 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at optabs.c:402

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55955 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 09:31:43 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 15 09:31:28 2013 New Revision: 195190 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195190 Log: PR tree

[Bug tree-optimization/55955] [4.8 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at optabs.c:402

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55955 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/54767] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code generated with -O2 -fcheck=bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54767 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 10:47:36 UTC --- Yeah, indeed. The bug seems to be in the second vrp pass on xxx function. iaii_23: [_79, _79] EQUIVALENCES: { } (0 elements) looks wrong (iaii_23

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 12:04:13 UTC --- Created attachment 29168 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29168 gcc48-pr55920.patch Looking at the #c3 patch, I wonder

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 15:11:40 UTC --- Created attachment 29170 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29170 gcc48-pr48087.patch Untested fix. That said, it seems

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 16:33:38 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 15 16:33:24 2013 New Revision: 195209 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195209 Log: PR tree

[Bug target/55940] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug target/55940] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 18:28:31 UTC --- I think: --- gcc/function.c.jj2013-01-11 09:02:55.0 +0100 +++ gcc/function.c2013-01-15 19:23:20.648826011 +0100 @@ -6029,7 +6029,7

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55936] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Missed VRP optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55936 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug rtl-optimization/55153] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:205 with -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 21:51:36 UTC --- Thanks for working on this. Unfortunately it seems the http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195211 change (commit message didn't make

[Bug target/55940] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 22:58:28 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 15 22:58:21 2013 New Revision: 195220 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195220 Log: PR target

[Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug target/55940] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/55998] [4.8 Regression] [C++11] 'integral expression .. is not constant' when instantiating template alias in a template using a parameter of an encapsulating template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55998 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 08:11:42 UTC --- Merging of target attribute is what gcc/g++ did though, the function would get then both target attributes (seems later decl's target wins

[Bug target/52122] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] incorrect ln -s replacement for mingw like targets in configure files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug target/55940] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 09:16:15 UTC --- As a workaround, you can use something like #if __GNUC__ == 4 __GNUC_MINOR__ == 7 __attribute__((__optimize__ (no-shrink-wrap))) #endif

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug sanitizer/55975] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 10:38:01 UTC --- Sounds like a recent change: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=commitdiff;h=048ee0993ec8360abb0b51bdf8f8721e9ed62ec4

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 10:47:18 UTC --- BTW, does Fortran have well defined number of iterations if say a do loop goes from (unknown to compiler): integer :: i, m, n m = huge(0) - 7 n

[Bug rtl-optimization/50176] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.7 generates spill-fill dealing with char-int conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 11:22:23 UTC --- Created attachment 29177 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29177 gcc48-pr50176.patch Are you sure about it? For me on the http

[Bug rtl-optimization/55153] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:205 with -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 11:31:51 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Tue Jan 15 16:47:36 2013 New Revision: 195211 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195211 Log: 2013-01-15

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 11:50:47 UTC --- I think for 44-46 bits we can still make it constant. But generally, the constructors of libasan are usually run from the stack of the initial thread

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 11:59:29 UTC --- Created attachment 29178 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29178 gcc48-pr52865.patch This untested patch makes the loop

[Bug tree-optimization/55964] [4.7 Regression] Segmentation fault with -O -ftree-loop-distribution -funswitch-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55964 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7

[Bug rtl-optimization/55547] [4.8 Regression] Alias analysis does not handle AND addresses correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug target/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/55153] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:205 with -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 16:02:35 UTC --- The actual merging of target attribute isn't that important, what would be more important is that other attributes are merged together in that case

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 16:05:42 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 16 16:05:27 2013 New Revision: 195241 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195241 Log: PR fortran

[Bug rtl-optimization/55547] [4.8 Regression] Alias analysis does not handle AND addresses correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 16:31:10 UTC --- Ah, hjl opened PR56006 to track #c11.

[Bug debug/56006] [4.8 Regression] Many guality testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56006 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/56006] [4.8 Regression] Many guality testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56006 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 19:06:09 UTC --- The second patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00822.html (which is waiting for Uros' bootstrap/regtest on alpha AFAIK) seems to fix

[Bug rtl-optimization/48181] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fgcse --param ira-max-conflict-table-size=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48181 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 23:07:19 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192719 fixed this (so, most likely reproduceable by disabling LRA).

[Bug middle-end/56015] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] expand expands p[9] = COMPLEX_EXPR -IMAGPART_EXPR p[9], REALPART_EXPR p[9]; incorrectly.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/56015] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] expand expands p[9] = COMPLEX_EXPR -IMAGPART_EXPR p[9], REALPART_EXPR p[9]; incorrectly.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17 10:31:08 UTC --- Created attachment 29189 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29189 gcc48-pr56015.patch Untested fix.

[Bug inline-asm/55934] [4.8 Regression] LRA inline asm error recovery

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55934 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17 10:45:20 UTC --- I don't care much about the error wording, I've put into dg-error just what gcc was reporting before (and after it emitted ICE).

[Bug target/56010] Powerpc, -mcpu=native and -mtune=native use the wrong name for target 7450

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56010 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje

[Bug c/56018] Access to member of unnamed union variable in structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56018 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug target/49069] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in gen_cstoredi4, at config/arm/arm.md:7554

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug target/49069] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in gen_cstoredi4, at config/arm/arm.md:7554

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17 16:08:15 UTC --- Created attachment 29193 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29193 gcc48-pr49069-1.patch One possible fix.

[Bug target/49069] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in gen_cstoredi4, at config/arm/arm.md:7554

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17 16:10:45 UTC --- Created attachment 29194 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29194 gcc48-pr49069-2.patch Another possible fix. Or Steven's fix

[Bug rtl-optimization/55273] [4.8 Regression] ICE in iv_number_of_iterations, at loop-iv.c:2819

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17 16:36:53 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 17 16:36:43 2013 New Revision: 195275 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195275 Log: PR tree

[Bug rtl-optimization/55273] [4.8 Regression] ICE in iv_number_of_iterations, at loop-iv.c:2819

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/55739] asan doesn't work on common symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55739 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17 16:49:58 UTC --- Ugh, no, that is way too premature. This really shouldn't be a dynamic relocation. And asan shouldn't be registering the same (common or in the end

[Bug sanitizer/55739] asan doesn't work on common symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55739 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17 17:48:18 UTC --- No idea why you keep mentioning .quadcommon_data .quadcommon_data@size .quadcommon_data@size + 40 That is nothing

[Bug libffi/56000] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/56006] [4.8 Regression] Many guality testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56006 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/56022] [4.8 regression] ICE (segfault) at convert_memory_address_addr_space (explow.c:334)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 13:02:41 UTC --- But why doesn't the 1 41 version work with both 44 and 46-bit VA? It should be: || `[0x0a00, 0x3fff]` || HighMem

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 13:52:02 UTC --- Ah yes, it can't be | SHADOW_OFFSET then, but has to be + SHADOW_OFFSET. + is what gcc emits (the reason for that was primarily that it resulted

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 14:18:58 UTC --- Created attachment 29207 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29207 gcc48-pr55742.patch This bug is open for way too long given its

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 15:41:09 UTC --- Forcing everything to be built as -pie is a non-starter. The 5% just aren't worth the trouble. Especially, how are you going to deal with say

[Bug tree-optimization/56029] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed, location references block not in block tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56029 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 16:54:56 UTC --- Created attachment 29209 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29209 gcc48-pr56029.patch The bug is that neither

[Bug tree-optimization/56029] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed, location references block not in block tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56029 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub

[Bug middle-end/56015] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] expand expands p[9] = COMPLEX_EXPR -IMAGPART_EXPR p[9], REALPART_EXPR p[9]; incorrectly.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 17:15:17 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 18 17:15:07 2013 New Revision: 195301 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195301 Log: PR middle-end

[Bug middle-end/56015] [4.6/4.7 Regression] expand expands p[9] = COMPLEX_EXPR -IMAGPART_EXPR p[9], REALPART_EXPR p[9]; incorrectly.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 17:51:42 UTC --- Created attachment 29211 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29211 gcc48-pr55742.patch Updated patch with ChangeLog entry and code

[Bug tree-optimization/56029] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed, location references block not in block tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56029 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 20:24:49 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 18 20:24:34 2013 New Revision: 195304 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195304 Log: PR tree

[Bug tree-optimization/56029] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed, location references block not in block tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56029 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/55433] [4.8 Regression][LRA] ICE on excessive reloads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55433 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #39 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-19 10:14:04 UTC --- Then to fix that perhaps we want to change ix86_valid_target_attribute_tree and its caller. Currently ix86_valid_target_attribute_tree returns

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29207|0 |1

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >