http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55327
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
02:23:33 UTC ---
fwprop in the failure case ends up replacing .
In insn 50, replacing
(sign_extend:V4SI (ashift:V4HI (subreg:V4HI (reg:V8HI 269 [ vect_var_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
02:25:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 28812
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28812
testcase and dumps.
regenerate with command line options
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54306
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54547
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-none-eabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54721
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54910
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54974
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55349
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55426
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-none-eabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52855
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50099
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52989
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53114
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53325
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53325
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53633
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53906
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53983
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54910
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55516
Bug #: 55516
Summary: strict volatile bitfields are broken on ARM.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54910
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-29
11:15:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
... and this particular case wouldn't arise, since Thumb-2 (ARMv7) implies the
CLZ instruction (ARMv5), and I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-29
13:29:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Patch applied.
fixes the issue and the another issue in perlbmk which had the exactly the same
symptoms
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55623
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54974
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
17:36:34 UTC ---
Matt,
Are you planning on backporting this to 4.7 ?
regards
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46003
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56058
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
10:45:09 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Jan 21 10:45:05 2013
New Revision: 195332
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195332
Log:
Fix up
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 30954
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30954action=edit
pre-processed file from libstdc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-none
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Oct 8 08:34:28 2013
New Revision: 203269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203269root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58619
2013-10-08
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #3)
Confirmed. The problem appears to show up with the use of mapcs on the
command line. Mine.
sched2 moves this ahead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31105
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31105action=edit
lightly tested patch.
completely untested but appears to fix the problem - Ben
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Oct 30 10:54:04 2013
New Revision: 204203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204203root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/58854
2013-10-30 Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58847
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58423
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31116
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31116action=edit
reduced testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf, |cris-axis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31121
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31121action=edit
arm-none-eabi reduced testcase
./cc1 -O2 -g -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mfpu=neon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Nov 11 09:38:14 2013
New Revision: 204665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204665root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport fix for PR target/58854
2013-11-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59091
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59091
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #11)
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #9)
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
I think major problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-10
14:58:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
shows up on 4.7 branch but latent on trunk.This has been marked predicable
ever
since the port was submitted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-15
07:56:48 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Aug 15 07:56:41 2012
New Revision: 190407
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190407
Log:
Fix PR target/54212
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-15
11:00:53 UTC ---
hmmm MEM_SIZE for the offending load appears to be 32 bytes. Something is fishy
here.
vld1.32 {d16}, [r3:128]! = Offending load
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-15
11:18:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
hmmm MEM_SIZE for the offending load appears to be 32 bytes. Something is
fishy
here.
vld1.32 {d16}, [r3:128
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-15
13:03:41 UTC ---
That ain't the root cause and that patch should really not be applied.
The problem really is in neon_dereference_pointer where we expand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-20
10:18:41 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Aug 20 10:18:36 2012
New Revision: 190527
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190527
Log:
Fix PR target/54212
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
10:17:08 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Aug 30 10:17:04 2012
New Revision: 190800
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190800
Log:
Fix PR target/54252
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
10:21:59 UTC ---
Fixed now I believe on trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54480
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54414
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54295
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54168
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ARM |arm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54067
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
23:06:29 UTC ---
Oh I see, my bad to have missed your command line. Sorry.
I see what's going on here. It's just luck that this works on x86_64 with your
invocation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-07 09:32:00 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Sep 7 09:31:54 2012
New Revision: 191059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191059
Log:
Fix PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54640
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Bug #: 55050
Summary: Regression test failure slp-21.c on arm-linux-gnueabi
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052
Bug #: 55052
Summary: [4.8 regression] vect-widening tests are failing and
giving wrong results
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56115
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55780
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56091
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54517
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55068
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56584
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #27 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-22 09:59:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
In case this won't be fixed in 4.6, then it is probably good to set the status
to WONTFIX so people know
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56916
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57256
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19599
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24234|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08
14:56:18 UTC ---
The patch below appears to trigger the issue but there's a fundamental question
as to why lower-subreg generates concatns when the documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53241
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52804
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52804
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 1212 matches
Mail list logo