[Gcl-devel] Re: on incf

2005-07-01 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks for the report! I've always felt, as I think you do too, that all these explicit declarations are against the spirit of lisp and the compiler should be smart enough to put in many of them itself. I'm just wrapping up a set of list and sequence compiler mods, thanks to

[Gcl-devel] Re: bug in 2.6.6 with two-word cons patch sent to Rockwell

2005-07-01 Thread dshardin
Camm Maguire wrote: Greetings, and thanks for your report! Here is the patch you need: [...] Thanks for the speedy reply, Camm -- the new patch did the trick for us. Do you find twc useful? Any disadvantages for the generic lisp user that you can see? I haven't seen any real

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: ANSI

2005-07-01 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Paul F. Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You want to run the random type prop tests. Start lisp, then: (load gclload1.lsp) (load random-type-prop-tests.lsp) These tests are explicitly designed to test type-driven compiler specializations of built-in functions. The member