Greetings, and thanks for the report!
I've always felt, as I think you do too, that all these explicit
declarations are against the spirit of lisp and the compiler should be
smart enough to put in many of them itself. I'm just wrapping up a
set of list and sequence compiler mods, thanks to
Camm Maguire wrote:
Greetings, and thanks for your report!
Here is the patch you need:
[...]
Thanks for the speedy reply, Camm -- the new patch
did the trick for us.
Do you find twc useful? Any disadvantages for the generic lisp
user
that you can see?
I haven't seen any real
Greetings!
Paul F. Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You want to run the random type prop tests. Start lisp, then:
(load gclload1.lsp)
(load random-type-prop-tests.lsp)
These tests are explicitly designed to test type-driven compiler
specializations of built-in functions. The member