Hi,
-Original Message-
From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
[mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of DJ Delorie
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 9:29 PM
To: gEDA user mailing list
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Polygon and track spacing
I added this to the wiki
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:09 PM, al davis ad...@freeelectron.net wrote:
If you look at free/open-source software as a product to be
consumed, like you consume commercial products, you will
probably be disappointed.
I disagree. While writing OSS has value in its own (as a method of
gaining
On Saturday 24 April 2010, Andrzej wrote:
Do you have any plans for releasing the new version? If so,
what would be its scope. I'm afraid that if it is going to
include all the planned features (which are pretty
ambitious, I must admit), it will remain a development
version forever.
Some
On 24/04/10 05:46, al davis wrote:
On Friday 23 April 2010, Link wrote:
Eh?
Suppose you had instead said:
===
.. I suggest
using Eagle through Darwine. In my personal experience,
Eagle is a lot better than geda, and
it is definitely an easier workflow.
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Rubén Gómez Antolí wrote:
Hi all:
El 19/04/10 23:31, Armin Faltl escribió:
[...]
Good evening everyone,
I hope nobody has troube with me writing German here now.
Please, don't took seriously my last e-mail, it was only a joke.
Really,
If I take my project.rc file and copy it to project.gsch2pcb and change
the output-name to something else so I don't clobber my ongoing
development and run xgsch2pcb, pcb then gives me a bunch of errors like:
Warning! Net +3.3V is shorted to net +5V
Warning! net +3.3V is shorted to net Vcc
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:04 -0400, Jim wrote:
If I take my project.rc file and copy it to project.gsch2pcb and
change
the output-name to something else so I don't clobber my ongoing
development and run xgsch2pcb, pcb then gives me a bunch of errors
Did you copy your board as well, or are
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 22:08 +0200, Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
You're right, this was done without too much thought. I'll try to
rewrite this and resubmit - unless you think that the core of this
patch
(having an option to edit line end style) is moot...
Round vs. square is probably
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:04 -0400, Jim wrote:
If I take my project.rc file and copy it to project.gsch2pcb and
change
the output-name to something else so I don't clobber my ongoing
development and run xgsch2pcb, pcb then gives me a bunch of errors
Did you copy
Thanks to all for your reply! :-)
Specially to Peter Clifton's, Stefan Salewski's and Tibor Palinkas's
answers.
PS: seems that everybody use Vim or Emacs! Is that a must? ;-) Maybe I
should start using one of them... Does anybody use [1]Geany? (which is
the one I'm actually
Why not giving Code::Blocks a try? I was told that C::B is especially
good for Gtk. Never tried though...
Miguel Sánchez de León Peque wrote:
Thanks to all for your reply! :-)
Specially to Peter Clifton's, Stefan Salewski's and Tibor Palinkas's
answers.
PS: seems that everybody
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 18:17 +0300, Justas Poderys wrote:
Why not giving Code::Blocks a try? I was told that C::B is especially
good for Gtk. Never tried though...
I have used Code::Blocks in Windoze for academic purposes once, and I
think it's the most Windoze-Similar way to write code on
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:46:41 -0400, al davis wrote:
Suppose you had instead said:
===
.. I suggest
using Eagle through Darwine. In my personal experience, Eagle is a lot
better than geda, and
it is definitely an easier workflow.
===
Is this any
On Apr 24, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Unfortunately, the opposite is true for gschem/gnucap vs ltspice
Unfortunately, it takes more skill to drive a Jeep than it take to drive a
tricycle.
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
j...@noqsi.com
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:40:47 -0400, al davis wrote:
There are other tarballs with plugins there, which you might want,
including all of the BSIM models including the latest BSIM4 and SOI.
-v, please.
For what components are there models actually available straight from
gnucap.org ?
Last time
On Apr 23, 2010, at 5:00 AM, Miguel Sánchez de León Peque wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a student interested in contributing to gEDA and learn some C ;-).
The biggest problem I find any time I start coding is how should I
write this?. You're always talking about deprecated code, libraries
On Apr 24, 2010, at 11:10 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Did nobody ever manage to build an opamp model from scratch and make it
available under an open source license? Is this too hard a task?
Not hard at all. I might throw a few at gedasymbols.org just for fun. Lets see,
somewhere around
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 09:19 -0400, Jim wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:04 -0400, Jim wrote:
If I take my project.rc file and copy it to project.gsch2pcb and
change
the output-name to something else so I don't clobber my ongoing
development and run xgsch2pcb,
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:36:59 -0600, John Doty wrote:
I might throw a few at gedasymbols.org just for fun.
Please do so.
Lack of models is a major road block to get started with simulation.
Once over the new users stage, more models will help to make even more.
The more models in the
I don't think it is a matter of skill.
I am an engineer / scientist who is interested in what *works*. I am
paid to get a certain piece of work done (for the best possible design
in the shortest amount of time), not spend time working around
imperfections of certain pieces of
On Apr 24, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de
wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:36:59 -0600, John Doty wrote:
I might throw a few at gedasymbols.org just for fun.
Please do so.
Lack of models is a major road block to get started with simulation.
Once over the new
On Apr 24, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Madhusudan Singh wrote:
I don't think it is a matter of skill.
I am an engineer / scientist who is interested in what *works*.
So am I. That's exactly why I find gEDA so powerful.
I am
paid to get a certain piece of work done (for the best possible
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 20:16 -0700, Jared Casper wrote:
I just discovered that the latest automake (1.11) has a nifty feature
to create silent build rules to produce a Linux kernel style build
that just displays CC file.c etc. instead of the whole command line
(must have missed the memo
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 20:59 -0400, George M. Gallant wrote:
the fab house requirements so getting this message is annoying.
Thanks for the tip on making sure to be centered on the part when
performing the change sides function.
Using version 20091103.
I think you need to select
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:42 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 20:59 -0400, George M. Gallant wrote:
the fab house requirements so getting this message is annoying.
Thanks for the tip on making sure to be centered on the part when
performing the change sides
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 13:25 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 13:10 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 12:37 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
I think I have to rename all of them, including John Luciani's.
You have components in your
On Saturday 24 April 2010, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Please do so.
Lack of models is a major road block to get started with
simulation. Once over the new users stage, more models will
help to make even more.
The more models in the quiver, the more gnucap users, the
more new models.
On Saturday 24 April 2010, Link wrote:
I hadn't intended for anyone to interpret it that way, and
I'm sorry if you interpreted that as bashing gEDA. Perhaps
my choice of words was rather unfortunate.
Apology accepted.
What I intended to is that one component (the simulator) of
LTSpice
Miguel,
I don't want to hurt you, how ever, the order of your first sentence
reads very wrong to me: learn a lot of C programming, good coding style
(there are dedicted styleguides for this, just google), then contribute
to a pretty complex program.
An introductory book on ANSI-C is good to
On Apr 24, 2010, at 5:42 PM, al davis wrote:
On Saturday 24 April 2010, Link wrote:
I hadn't intended for anyone to interpret it that way, and
I'm sorry if you interpreted that as bashing gEDA. Perhaps
my choice of words was rather unfortunate.
Apology accepted.
What I intended to is
The lesstif GUI has a minimalist layout in order to maximize the
amount of screen real estate that goes to the layout window.
Is there a true reason this is not done in the GTK+ GUI? - I wrote 3-4
GUI programs
so far from Microsoft foundation classes to raw X11 to GTK+ to FLTK and
always
The lesstif GUI has a minimalist layout in order to maximize the
Is there a true reason this is not done in the GTK+ GUI?
The GTK interface is similar to the Xaw one we had before; it's easier
to use because the common buttons are right there. Somewhere, I have
a patch for the lesstif GUI
I made a first attempt to create a database schema, that's a collection
of table definitions on this - It's not a good idea to work on tables
representing trees and DAG's at 02:00 in the morning, so this is just
sketches and reminders of what I want. Some other list member is working
in the same
What I forgot: my personal experience is with PostgreSQL (have it installed
under Linux and Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, works excellent).
This is what I would use for a shared environment (eg. web-resource).
For read only or single user systems sqlite may be useful.
However, the table
I'm here only for a bit over a week, got a lot of help and try to
contribute something.
In my opinion, even if you were bashing gEDA or parts of it, this would
be still your
right, while probably no good place. What sounds like bashing in the
ears of some
contains constructive criticisim in
al davis wrote:
A model site should be models not just spice models to leave
it open for all kinds of models.
A models site is the second step. First and foremost, there should be a
decent stock of models included in the default install of gnucap.
The problem is not a lack of models, but
Is it correct, that round linestyle is default because of its superior
mechanical/thermal properties? - I definitely read this for pads and
it's easy to imagine, that a corner more easily delaminates than a round
edge. In the light of this, a small bend corner style would be cool ;-)
Peter
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 2:17 PM, John Doty [1]...@noqsi.com wrote:
On Apr 24, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Madhusudan Singh wrote:
I don't think it is a matter of skill.
I am an engineer / scientist who is interested in what *works*.
So am I. That's exactly why I find gEDA so
Maybe
there's no book for that, it's just programming experience... am I
right? (I hope not! xD)
Thanks in advance,
A student who is a bit confused about which is good modern C
programming style... :-)
I don't think there is any such thing. These days coders type first and
On Apr 24, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Madhusudan Singh wrote:
Failure to correspond to your prejudices is not imperfection.
Needing an extra 20 minutes after wiring the net, to populate spice
models for each gschem schematic (instead of having a set of default
libraries that do that for
On Saturday 24 April 2010, kai-martin knaak wrote:
There should not be a need to search for specific models for
getting started with basic circuits in the first place. The
models don't have to be exact. But they need to be available
right away.
Ah .. there's a good idea .. don't have
Can you make a list of the ones that should be included?
I can't make the list, but can tell you what I use:
- resistor
- potentiometer
- capacitor
- inductor
- diode (including Zener, Schottky,... )
- bipolar transistors
- MOSFETs
- op-amp
- Schmitt-trigger
- logic gates (NAND),
DJ Delorie wrote:
Bizzare thought - our online documentation should be done as a series
of PCB files that illustrate the operations. We already know how to
render those - just pop up the relevent ones in a new window :-)
And it is very compact data -- low load on the distribution.
I'll keep
On Saturday 24 April 2010, Armin Faltl wrote:
I can't make the list, but can tell you what I use:
- resistor
- potentiometer
- capacitor
- inductor
- diode (including Zener, Schottky,... )
- bipolar transistors
- MOSFETs
- op-amp
- Schmitt-trigger
- logic gates (NAND), sometimes
DJ Delorie wrote:
Bizzare thought - our online documentation should be done as a series
of PCB files that illustrate the operations. We already know how to
render those - just pop up the relevent ones in a new window :-)
And it is very compact data -- low load on the distribution.
45 matches
Mail list logo
