[gem5-users] X86 full system with mutlicore

2011-06-03 Thread 冠男陳
Dear M5, I'm now trying to simulate a full system with more than 1 core (CPU). With image x86_64-vmlinux-2.6.22.9, I got following messages in m5term: markcup:~/Gem5/m5_new$ ./build/X86_FS/m5.debug configs/example/fs.py -n 4 m5 slave terminal: Terminal 0 Linux version 2.6.22.9

Re: [gem5-users] X86 full system with mutlicore

2011-06-03 Thread Gabe Black
X86 doesn't have PAL code so you don't have to worry about that. There are Linux patches for it, but those aren't necessary for it to work properly, they just help the simulator run faster. There's a configuration option for the kernel that sets how many CPUs it supports. That's probably set to 1.

Re: [gem5-users] Question about checkpoint

2011-06-03 Thread Joel Hestness
Hi Atieh, This is a tricky question to answer, because it depends on a lot of other configuration parameters. If you are using the ALPHA or x86 architectures, I know that checkpointing works for both SE and FS. The other architectures might also work, but I'd have to defer to others on the

[gem5-users] InOrder ALPHA SE. Confusion about implementation of the ActivityRecorder

2011-06-03 Thread reena panda
Hi All, I am working with the InOrder CPU model for ALPHA ISA in SE mode. I have attached a monitoring unit, parallel to the main InOrder CPU pipeline. This monitoring unit is itself pipelined and am making use of the another instantiation of the TimeBufferStruct to communicate between its