Dims,
It appears that we need more discussion on this issues. I think that we can
reach consensus on some; perhaps not on others.
Do you want to summarize the feedback on the wiki, so that we can revise?
--- Noel
-
will do. If anyone *else* wants to do it, please go ahead and update
the wiki as well.
Last time, i specifically asked for people to look there and no one
did till it hit the [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a VOTE :(
thanks,
dims
On 1/20/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dims,
It appears
thx
David Crossley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I thought there would be xdocs from the cwiki I could grab - otherwise,
I need to convert the html to xdoc.
I will 'svn ci' my generated xdocs into site/xdocs2
It would be good if some other people can look
over the new source docs and the
How do you fit in / are going to fit in with
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/atf/ ?
Zimbra is mentioned there.
Mvgr,
Martin
Andrew Clark wrote:
I have made a few modifications to the Ajax proposal
Wiki page[1] in an attempt to resolve a few of the
issues people have raised. The changes
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
How do you fit in / are going to fit in with
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/atf/ ?
Zimbra is mentioned there.
If you look closely, that proposal closely matches the diffs between the
first draft and second draft of the AJAX Toolkit Proposal that was
presented
