identifying a mail id

Hi, Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but following the PPMC guide [1] to vote a new member in, I have to send an e-mail with the vote thread msgid, but I don't know how I can get this id. Any help would be appreciated. Xavier [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html --

Re: identifying a mail id

take a look at the mail headers for the Message-ID field. On 08/08/07, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but following the PPMC guide [1] to vote a new member in, I have to send an e-mail with the vote thread msgid, but I don't know how I

RE: identifying a mail id

That depends which mailer you are using. The messageID is in the mail headers. From gmail web interface you can ask View Original. From Outlook, there is a View Options. Gilles -Original Message- From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mercredi 8 août 2007 12:26 To:

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Tuscany SDO Java 1.0-incubating (release candidate 4)

+1 ...ant On 8/6/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the SDO Java 1.0-incubating release. The vote thread is here ... http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg21169.html Since this is a small delta on the

[Proposal] Sling

Hi all, I would like to propose a new Apache project named Sling. The proposal text is attached to this message and can also be found at [1]. More information on Sling may be found in the Jackrabbit Wiki at [2]. I would like to have the discussion on this proposal to go on in parallel in the

Re: [Proposal] Sling

On Wednesday 08 August 2007 21:23, Felix Meschberger wrote: I would like to propose a new Apache project named Sling. +1, as Incubator PMC member. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here;

Re: [Proposal] Sling

On Wednesday 08 August 2007 22:20, Felix Meschberger wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 17:03 +0300 schrieb Alexandru Popescu ☀: Very interesting initiative Felix! Still, I am wondering why this would not start as a Jackrabbit contrib project, and I don't think I have seen this in the

Re: [Proposal] Sling

Hi Alex, Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 17:03 +0300 schrieb Alexandru Popescu ☀: Very interesting initiative Felix! Still, I am wondering why this would not start as a Jackrabbit contrib project, and I don't think I have seen this in the attached proposal. The reason for not simply adding it as

Re: [Proposal] Sling

On 8/8/07, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Alex, Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 17:03 +0300 schrieb Alexandru Popescu ☀: Very interesting initiative Felix! Still, I am wondering why this would not start as a Jackrabbit contrib project, and I don't think I have seen this in the

Re: [Proposal] Sling

Very interesting initiative Felix! Still, I am wondering why this would not start as a Jackrabbit contrib project, and I don't think I have seen this in the attached proposal. tia, ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. On 8/8/07, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I would like to

Re: identifying a mail id

Got it, thanks! Xavier On 8/8/07, Gilles Scokart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That depends which mailer you are using. The messageID is in the mail headers. From gmail web interface you can ask View Original. From Outlook, there is a View Options. Gilles -Original Message-

Re: ezmlm stripping Outlook attachments

Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On 8/7/07, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We've had a number of complaints about ezmlm stripping plain text attachments to posts such as patches sent by Microsoft Outlook. Other mailers (e.g., Mozilla) don't have this problem. IIRC this was a measure

Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.1-incubator

Robert, I uploaded fixed versions to: http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.1-incubator_take3 The ONLY changes are: 1) Fixed the file names on the .asc files for the eclipse plugin so the signatures will validate correctly. (workaround maven bug :-( ) 2) Updated the README.txt

Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.1-incubator

On 8/8/07, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert, I uploaded fixed versions to: http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.1-incubator_take3 great i hope to be able to take a look a little later tonight The ONLY changes are: 1) Fixed the file names on the .asc files for the

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Tuscany SDO Java 1.0-incubating (release candidate 4)

On 8/6/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the SDO Java 1.0-incubating release. The vote thread is here ... http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg21169.html Since this is a small delta on the RC3 for this

Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.1-incubator

On 8/8/07, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert, daniel I uploaded fixed versions to: http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.1-incubator_take3 +1 - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Tuscany Java DAS beta1 (1.0-incubating-beta1)

On 8/7/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java DAS beta1 (1.0-incubating-beta1). hi luciano i think that you may have the same issues with permissions as kelvin (see

RE: [Proposal] Sling

As such each request URL addresses a Content object which in turn resolves to a Component, which finally is responsible for handling the request and providing a response. And this differs from a Servlet/Portlet, how? Recognizing the need to componentize development of Web Applications and