Re: Question about distributing packages

Hi Otto, I don't really know the answer, but here is my best guess. According to this: https://help.sonatype.com/repomanager3/formats A Nexus repository should be able to provide support, but I'm not aware of the Apache Nexus repository having

Re: New Proposals

Hi Eya, If you haven't come across this document, I'd suggest you start here: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html You need a champion first. A number of projects get mentors to volunteer during the discussion phase. Thanks,

Re: Add some instructions or make the link available on Nuttx home page

Hi Jincheng, The status page is now live and being populated: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nuttx.html I'm not sure where the broken link in the main apache.org page is. -Flavio > On 16 Dec 2019, at 08:07, jincheng sun wrote: > > I found there is a link of NuttX is not work in home

Re: [VOTE] Accept NuttX into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Flavio > On 4 Dec 2019, at 09:46, Furkan KAMACI wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 11:44 AM Duo Zhang wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> tison 于2019年12月4日周三 下午3:34写道： >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Best, >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] NuttX Proposal

To Justin's point, there are four listed mentors. Even if the listed mentors either haven't been active or do not have tons of extra time, I'd think that among four we should be able to figure it out. If anyone else steps up, then great, but otherwise, we should not block the vote on it.

Re: [DISCUSS] NuttX Proposal

Hi Junping, I'd like to volunteer. -Flavio > On 3 Dec 2019, at 11:19, 俊平堵 wrote: > > Got it. Thanks for updating, Ted. > Any other volunteers? > > Thanks, > > Junping > > Ted Dunning 于2019年12月3日周二 下午6:15写道： > >> Jumping, >> >> It would be great to help more with nuttx, but my board

Re: Omid and Tephra

+1 -Flavio > On 23 Oct 2019, at 21:08, Terence Yim wrote: > > +1 on this > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:36 Dave Fisher wrote: > >> +1. That’s a good idea. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Oct 23, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Alan Gates wrote: >>> >>> Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra, >>>

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache DistributedLog as a subproject of Apache BookKeeper

The vote passes with the following: - 3 +1 binding votes: * Flavio Junqueira * Henry Saputra * John D. Ament - 6 +1 non-binding votes: * David Rusek * Sijie Guo * Jia Zhai * Von Gosling * Leigh Stewart * Xinyu Zhou - No -1

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache DistributedLog as a subproject of Apache BookKeeper

>>> Best Regards, >>> Von Gosling >>> >>> >>>> 在 2017年6月29日，13:42，Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> 写道： >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:25 AM, John D. Ament <johndam.

Re: Copying private and public lists on VOTE thread (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache DistributedLog as a subproject of Apache BookKeeper)

lt;john.d.am...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:27 PM Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org > <mailto:f...@apache.org>> wrote: > >> >>> On 28 Jun 2017, at 17:25, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org >>> <mailto:johndam...@apache

Copying private and public lists on VOTE thread (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache DistributedLog as a subproject of Apache BookKeeper)

. Perhaps I should have added them bcc instead. Thanks for voting. -Flavio > I'm +1 to graduate. > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:06 AM Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > >> The Apache DistributedLog community has voted to graduate the project and >> make

[VOTE] Graduate Apache DistributedLog as a subproject of Apache BookKeeper

The Apache DistributedLog community has voted to graduate the project and make it a subproject of Apache BookKeeper. The Apache BookKeeper PMC has also voted to accept DistributedLog as a subproject. The links to the vote threads are the following: DistributedLog PPMC vote:

Re: [VOTE] Release SAMOA 0.4.0 (incubating) RC1

+1 - Built from sources and ran tests - Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files - Checked digests and signatures of the sources zip file and pom - Ran rat through maven I have some additional feedback: - `mvn -Pstorm package` didn't build cleanly for me, I got test errors:

Add committer to podling

Hello! I'm wondering what the right way is to add committers to a podling with a git repository. According to this page, we add them to the incubator ldap group: http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#karma-podling but I wanted to confirm because

Mailing list creation (DistributedLog)

Hi there, I'm wondering how long it typically takes infra to create the mailing lists for a podling. I have requested the creation of the lists for the DistributedLog podling, but I haven't seen any response. We typically receive the notification via the private list, and how much longer I

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 > On 28 Jun 2016, at 15:28, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to > the infra team on how to implement going forward. > > Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $ >

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

License) >> * Junit (Eclipse Public License 1.0) >> * LZ4-java (Apache Software License v2.0) >> * SLF4J (MIT License) >> * Twitter Finagle (Apache Software License v2.0) >> * Twitter Scrooge (Apache Software Lice

Re: Wiki write access

Thank you, John. -Flavio > On 08 Jun 2016, at 12:21, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > Added, happy editing! > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:07 AM Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Can I have write access for user "

Re: Podling web site

you want >> to use git/gh-pages then you will need to submit an infra ticket >> >> -Jake >> >> [1]: https://infra.apache.org/officers/webreq >> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi

Podling web site

Hi there, We are looking into creating a web site for the Apache Omid project and I'm not clear on what the process is for putting a web site up for an incubating project. The instructions here: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html say

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

mainstream operation. >>> >>> * Adaptability. Omid current version provides transactions on data >>> stored in Apache HBase. However, Omid¹s components are generic enough >>> to be adapted to any other key-value NoSQL datasource that supports >>> MVCC. >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Those are great observations, Nick. Merging projects is often hard even if the developers are willing to do it, though. The projects could be already running in production and major changes could be disruptive to the point of making the merged project not viable. Attempting to merge projects

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Really nice project, happy to see it incubating. -Flavio > On 04 Mar 2016, at 09:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 03/02/2016 04:06 PM, Gangumalla, Uma wrote: >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Regards, >> Uma >> >> On 3/1/16,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding), good project, everything looks good in the proposal. -Flavio > On 26 Feb 2016, at 15:09, chatz wrote: > > +1 > > On 26 February 2016 at 20:10, Phillip Rhodes > wrote: > >> +1 >> On Feb 26, 2016 09:38, "Daniel J Debrunner"

Re: [VOTE] Accept Milagro into the Incubator

+1 binding. Great project, good luck. -Flavio > On 15 Dec 2015, at 21:27, Tom Barber wrote: > > +1 binding > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Sterling Hughes < > sterling.hughes.pub...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 binding >> >>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 7:51 AM, Colm

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fineract into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Very interesting project. -Flavio > On 10 Dec 2015, at 19:22, Luciano Resende wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Ross Gardler > wrote: > >> I would like to call a vote on accepting the Fineract project

Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need 3 +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The confusing perhaps comes from this sentence in the podling release management manual: The vote passes if there are at least 3 +1's from the PPMC/IPMC members and

Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

On Aug 12, 2012, at 12:09 PM, sebb wrote: On 7 August 2012 14:42, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need 3 +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The confusing perhaps comes from this sentence

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast.. afaict so far you have 1 (me). Patrick On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@s4.io wrote: We are missing an IPMC vote for this release and the vote closes today. Can we get an IPMC member to vote, please? Thanks

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

We are missing an IPMC vote for this release and the vote closes today. Can we get an IPMC member to vote, please? Thanks, -Flavio On Aug 2, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: +1, I checked that the src artifact compiles and tests pass. I have also gone through license and notice

[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-10) Name search

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13427207#comment-13427207 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-10: --- I'm

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

+1, I checked that the src artifact compiles and tests pass. I have also gone through license and notice files for the bin artifact, and I couldn't spot any issue. On Aug 1, 2012, at 7:16 PM, Leo Neumeyer wrote: +1 Thank you for your leadership, Matthieu. On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:54 AM,

Re: S4 status (was: Re: Thoughts on Incubator board reports)

Hi Jukka, We can certainly provide the information you request. Do you want us to update the last report or to consider it for future reports? -Flavio On Mar 14, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, Thanks for the review and followup, Daniel! Flavio Junqueira wrote on Wed, Mar 14

Re: S4 status (was: Re: Thoughts on Incubator board reports)

Let's leave it for the next report then, I probably have all information but spread across sources, so I don't have it ready. Thanks, -Flavio On Mar 14, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@s4.io wrote: Hi Jukka, We can

Re: S4 status (was: Re: Thoughts on Incubator board reports)

Thanks for your interest in the project. Here are my thoughts about the points raised. I'd like to hear from the PPMC how they plan to expand their dev community. I expect us to attract more developers by increasing awareness. We have given presentations about the project internally (at

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

Gopalakrishna was the main developer of the communication layer and the integration with Zookeeper. He has been an active contributor to Hadoop. * Flavio Junqueira has a background in distributed computing. He is a committer of ZooKeeper, a ZooKeeper PMC member, and a committer of BookKeeper

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

Thanks for pointing it out, Bertrand. I have just fixed it on the wiki. -Flavio On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: ...Please cast your votes: [ X] +1 Accept S4 for incubation ... * Matthieu

Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator

+ -- any IPMC members out there that could help with the mentoring effort? Regards, Patrick On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@s4.io wrote: To give you an idea of what we have in mind

Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator

Hi Vinod, Thanks for the support and comments. See my more comments below: On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:55 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: Great addition to Apache, +1. Some comments on the proposal: - In the Initial Goals section, you referred to Add a cluster management system. Not sure of

Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator

Hi Phillip, Thanks for your feedback, see some more comments below: On Sep 16, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: Our expectation when we submitted the proposal was that the initial set of committers would comprise the people who have initially contributed to get the current code to

Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator

Hi everyone, To introduce myself, I'm a ZooKeeper committer and PMC member. I'm used to the process of selecting committers for ZooKeeper, but I'm new to the incubator process, so I would appreciate if the community could shed some light here. I have read the guide to participation: