Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-03-01 Thread Eric Sammer
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:18 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Guys, I don't know, none of those things really sound like justification for a separate TLP, keeping something like

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:46 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Eric Sammer esam...@cloudera.com wrote: == Rationale == MRUnit has existed as a contrib component of Apache Hadoop. This has served to introduce users to the library and to provide

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Guys, I don't know, none of those things really sound like justification for a separate TLP, keeping something like this nearby to Hadoop MapReduce seems like it would help give it a better chance of long term survival to me. Wouldn't simply moving mrunit out from

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread ant elder
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Guys, I don't know, none of those things really sound like justification for a separate TLP, keeping something like this nearby to Hadoop MapReduce seems like it would help give it a better

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Chris, On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: The Hadoop community has been VOTE'ing over the past month to abandon development of portions of their code base... ...A few of us members (myself, Patrick and Nige) were willing to step

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Ant, On Feb 28, 2011, at 7:18 AM, ant elder wrote: You're right about the entry criteria, there's a very low bar to becoming an Incubator poddling so if you all really want to I'm pretty sure you'll be able to make it happen. But this is a proposal discussion thread which asks for

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hey Bertrand, On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: My point was that the technical reasons listed in this thread don't seem to warrant forking MRUnit into its own project, Meh, arguably they do. One of the big issues is release

[PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-27 Thread Eric Sammer
All: I'd like to propose MRUnit - a library to aid in the development of unit tests of Apache Hadoop map reduce jobs - be accepted into the Apache Incubator. The proposal is up on the Incubator wiki at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal as well as pasted below. Thanks in advance for

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-27 Thread ant elder
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Eric Sammer esam...@cloudera.com wrote: == Rationale == MRUnit has existed as a contrib component of Apache Hadoop. This has served to introduce users to the library and to provide necessary functionality to developers in the form of development support. That