-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following votes were given:
+1 Alan Cabrera (transferred from vote on vcl-...@i.a.o list)
+1 Kevan Miller (transferred from vote on vcl-...@i.a.o list)
+1 Niall Pemberton
+1 Ant Elder
Leo Simons made some notable comments:
3) There is no
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in
On 23/11/2009, Josh Thompson josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not on the general incubator list but have followed the discussion for
this thread via the online archives.
There are two things I'd like to point out. I created the archive in
Hey hey,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Josh Thompson josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu wrote:
The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to
publish this release.
The release artifact, sums, and
All,
Would appreciate some reviews and votes for this release. It's the first
Incubator release for VCL and could definitely benefit from some extra eyes.
Thanks!
--kevan
On Nov 18, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Incubator PMC,
The
On 18/11/2009, Josh Thompson josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Incubator PMC,
The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to
publish this
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
more commonly supported.
IMO, this is a release blocker
Just curious why you think this is a blocker? Each project knows
better what formats are
I ran a RAT report on the release and all looks good. Has the
appropriate license/notice/disclaimer files. From what I can see only
the project source is shipped, so although there are some dependencies
that wouldn't be allowed under ASF policy, since they're not shipped
with the release then this
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
more commonly supported.
IMO, this is a release blocker
Just curious why you
sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
more commonly supported.
IMO, this is a release blocker
On 23/11/2009, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
more
).
- Original Message
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, November 23, 2009 11:51:58 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1
On 23/11/2009, Branko Čibej wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
more commonly supported.
IMO, this is
On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a
sebb wrote:
Not relevant - the discussion is about what archives are supported by
the OS, not the development process.
I thought it was about which archive formats an ASF release should be
distributed in. All I ever recall reading in policy documents are
requirements about the /contents/ of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not on the general incubator list but have followed the discussion for
this thread via the online archives.
There are two things I'd like to point out. I created the archive in .bz2
format because that is what was suggested in the last
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Incubator PMC,
The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to
publish this release.
The release artifact, sums, and GPG signature can be found
18 matches
Mail list logo
