On 2/6/2012 12:29 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
My biggest problem is that the proposal moves undefined responsibilities to
ComDev while none of the candidates have actually spoken to ComDev about
this
As
On 2/5/2012 12:37 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
One thing that is not clear on the proposal is that it says that
releases will be responsibility of the TLPs, but it doest not suggest
or require that the actual existing ASF members that are part of the
TLP have to vote on the release. This might
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
My biggest problem is that the proposal moves undefined responsibilities to
ComDev while none of the candidates have actually spoken to ComDev about
this
As a comdev PMC member, I am opposed to making that PMC
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
My biggest problem is that the proposal moves undefined responsibilities to
ComDev while none of the candidates have actually
Thanks Bertrand.
I hope that ComDev can help with the future incubation. However, it is a
small PMC and thus any transition of responsibilities must be done in a
controlled and managed way.
Ross
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 6, 2012 6:30 AM, Bertrand
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 4, 2012 3:41 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Ross,
On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 4 February 2012 02:01, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
Hi Ross,
On Feb 4, 2012, at 2:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 4, 2012 3:41 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
[...snip...]
Who fixes it?
The project's PMC. And if not, the project's VP. And
Chris, seriously, take a break. You are not hearing what I'm trying to say
and therefore not answering my concerns, directly at least.
For an example see where you use the word failure in this reply - that word
has no bearing on anything I have said, yet you directly attribute it to
me.
I've
Hey Ross,
On Feb 4, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Chris, seriously, take a break. You are not hearing what I'm trying to say
and therefore not answering my concerns, directly at least.
I could say the same thing to you. :)
We both care about this stuff, which is why we keep
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Ross,
On Feb 4, 2012, at 2:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 4, 2012 3:41 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
My biggest problem is that the proposal moves undefined responsibilities to
ComDev while none of the candidates have actually spoken to ComDev about
this.
Doesn't that strike the candidates as a little odd?
l want to know what ComDev is being asked to do. The proposal in the wiki
is not clear in
On 2/3/2012 7:06 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Do any of the candidates want to take a little time to define the role they
see for ComDev?
Sounds like additional documentation for the proposal
Committee: Previous responsibility --- Revised responsibility
_ ___
Hey Bill,
On Feb 3, 2012, at 5:18 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/3/2012 7:06 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Do any of the candidates want to take a little time to define the role they
see for ComDev?
Sounds like additional documentation for the proposal
Committee: Previous
On 4 February 2012 02:01, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
...
Sounds like additional documentation for the proposal
Committee: Previous responsibility --- Revised responsibility
_ ___ __
Hi Ross,
On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 4 February 2012 02:01, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
...
Sounds like additional documentation for the proposal
Committee: Previous responsibility --- Revised responsibility
_
15 matches
Mail list logo