Maven looks very useful and I like the direction its going. Please take a
look at
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=387260group_id=26444func=browse for
other and similar ideas.
Cheers,
Mike.
- Original Message -
From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 03:20, Mike Hogan wrote:
Maven looks very useful and I like the direction its going. Please take a
look at
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=387260group_id=26444func=browse for
other and similar ideas.
Cool, feel free to submit those ideas to the Maven mailing list
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Danny Angus wrote:
Morning,
I wrote:
I'm not qualified to put forward any suggestions
That doesnt stop most people, including myself from replying ;)
Sam replied:
I respectfully disagree.
Thanks Sam, I'll now bore you with my own opinion, and see if you
Leo Simons wrote:
As long as we agree that nothing should get into the way of
site functionality (and we do), why would you oppose a site that
also is easy to navigate and looks good?
The only thing I oppose is the idea something being set in stone or
approved by some mythical
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 16:06, Peter Donald wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 07:49, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
*gets the feeling that the project marketing campaign for Maven has
begun and wonders if he bought into a time share and singed up for a
free seminar by accident*
The funny thing is that
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 17:12, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a small screenshot of the maven page with a white
header.
Aaah WINXPCRAP! :)
+1
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Not to mention the problems of supporting multiple versions of Log4j.
But I really think this discussion belongs in the commons-dev mail
list. Ceki is making criticisms against an API etc, that really should
be taken up in the appropriate forum.
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 20:13, Scott Sanders
