Re: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

2002-04-26 Thread James Strachan
From: Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sou you end up with something like following in torque MyData (The Biz Object) MyDataVO (The Value Object) MyDataPeer (The Peer) AbstractMyData (the abstract biz object) AbstractMyDataPeer (The abstract Peer) And the only one decoupled from the

RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

2002-04-26 Thread Danny Angus
Can anyone compare/contrast features between this and Torque? That animated diagram! Torque has nothing like this. The price. Torque is Open Source, and can therefore be successfully adapted to suit the bizzare pecadilos of any organisation. From the site I can't see very much difference

Re: [PROPOSAL] crossdb

2002-04-26 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's called wurstel in germany, and works great with rosti... :) You mean Würstchen and Rösti, I guess. 8-) Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Re: [PROPOSAL] crossdb

2002-04-26 Thread travis
There are 3 so far. List is at bottom of proposal. Travis Original Message From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2002-04-26 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] crossdb On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (3) current state crossdb is ready to use

Subproject - satyr

2002-04-26 Thread Scott Milne
*** This is an initial draft proposal for a subproject request. I am submitting this now to see if there is any interest in this project. *** Satyr Project Documentation: http://209.164.108.27/satyr/docs/index.html Version

RE: [PROPOSAL] crossdb

2002-04-26 Thread Steve A. Olson
When writing SQL for Oracle, for example, I often make use of the more powerful functions like DECODE(), TO_CHAR(), SIGN(), etc. These functions could be quite difficult to make portable to databases that don't support user-defined database functions. Especially if these functions are used

Re: Subproject - satyr

2002-04-26 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
I'm totally +1 for this project. Here are my reasons: We really need another JSP web app framework. We really need another project with only 3 developers who all work for the same company. We really need another project with no existing community. We really need another

Re: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

2002-04-26 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 4/26/02 2:30 PM, Steve A. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regarding Generators ... not really O/R ... but we've had success with SQLTags (www.sqltags.org) that uses a generator to produce a java class and JSP tag for each table defined by the JDBC metadata. Each tag knows how to compose

Re: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

2002-04-26 Thread Andy Armstrong
Jon Scott Stevens wrote: [snip] Bah. Throws the entire concept of MVC out the window. Which is a bad thing? -- Andy Armstrong, http://www.tagish.co.uk/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Subproject - satyr

2002-04-26 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
I tried to download the source. No go... On 4/26/02 5:09 PM, Scott Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *** This is an initial draft proposal for a subproject request. I am submitting this now to see if there is any interest in this project. ***

Re: Subproject - satyr

2002-04-26 Thread Scott Milne
Hi Jon, I'll assume there is no need for further details of my proposal. However, I'd like to clarify some of your points. We really need another JSP web app framework. It is not only a web framework. The core components can be used to build any application. We just chose a web application

RE: RE: [PROPOSAL] crossdb

2002-04-26 Thread travis
Of course, you can't use database specific functions in a cross database way. But you can support a subset of functions that are common across the different databases even if they use different syntax, example would be date part functions, like in mysql, you would use YEAR(), MONTH(), etc,

RE: RE: [PROPOSAL] crossdb

2002-04-26 Thread travis
Of course, you can't use database specific functions in a cross database way. But you can support a subset of functions that are common across the different databases even if they use different syntax, example would be date part functions, like in mysql, you would use YEAR(), MONTH(), etc,

Re: Subproject - satyr

2002-04-26 Thread Scott Milne
Please try again now. I just updated the web page a few moments ago while the source code was uploading. You may have tried the link before the file was available. I just tried it now, and it works for me. Scott Milne I tried to download the source. No go... On 4/26/02 5:09 PM, Scott Milne

Re: Subproject - satyr

2002-04-26 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 4/26/02 3:00 PM, Scott Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jon, I'll assume there is no need for further details of my proposal. However, I'd like to clarify some of your points. We really need another JSP web app framework. It is not only a web framework. The core components can

Re: Subproject - satyr

2002-04-26 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
LOL :-D On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 17:30, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: I'm totally +1 for this project. Here are my reasons: We really need another JSP web app framework. We really need another project with only 3 developers who all work for the same company. We really need

RE: RE: [PROPOSAL] crossdb

2002-04-26 Thread Michael A. Smith
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, you can't use database specific functions in a cross database way. But you can support a subset of functions that are common across the different databases even if they use different syntax, example would be date part functions, like in