Hi Olivier,
On 2014-11-26 09:11, Olivier Nyssen wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but Common is not compatible with the current
SDK, which would be a huge problem imo.
At the moment Tizen has multiple different SDKs: Tizen 2.3 SDK, Tizen
SDK for Wearable 1.0.0, Tizen-based Samsung TV SDK 1.0
Hi All,
Last week at Slush 2014 both Nokia and Jolla revealed tablets with Intel
Atom 64-bit CPUs powered respectively by Android and SailfishOS. Later
it was announced that Nokia N1 will be manufactured by Foxconn.
Similar devices seem as a good choice for potential development of a
Tizen
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Leon Anavi l...@anavi.org wrote:
Hi All,
Last week at Slush 2014 both Nokia and Jolla revealed tablets with Intel
Atom 64-bit CPUs powered respectively by Android and SailfishOS. Later it
was announced that Nokia N1 will be manufactured by Foxconn.
Similar
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Leon Anavi l...@anavi.org wrote:
Hi All,
Last week at Slush 2014 both Nokia and Jolla revealed tablets with Intel
Atom 64-bit CPUs powered respectively by Android and SailfishOS. Later it
was announced that Nokia N1 will be manufactured by Foxconn.
Similar
On 27/10/2014 00:18, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 18:13:14 + Saxena, Sunil sunil.sax...@intel.com
said:
Agreed that IoT will require us to add to existing Tizen Common for
discovering, communicating, security, services of these devices.
I wanted to
On Sunday 26 October 2014 04:21:00 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Saturday 25 October 2014 10:21:25 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
Like I said: why would we need a separate profile for IoT, which will be
-by definition-
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Sunday 26 October 2014 04:21:00 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Saturday 25 October 2014 10:21:25 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
Hi Olivier,
On 2014-10-26 16:35, Olivier Nyssen wrote:
IoT = an upcoming feature that may be needed by mobile, IVI,
wearables and other profiles
With all due respect, I don't think I agree with you. The specifications
of Tizen profiles related to IoT should depend on the different use
I think one of the problems that we will run into pretty fast is that
one of the definitions of Tizen Common is that it will contain features
that are Common between two or more profiles. Now if we look at the
Smartphone profile and the wearable profile that might be used by
something like the
Before we go any further, I would like to know if you guys agree with this
basic logic:
1) Tizen Common is a common development / build / test platform for any
upcoming features that may be needed by mobile, IVI, wearables, and other
profiles.
2) IoT is an upcoming feature that may be needed by
:37 AM
To: general@lists.tizen.org
Subject: Re: [Tizen General] Tizen Tablet
Before we go any further, I would like to know if you guys agree with this
basic logic:
1) Tizen Common is a common development / build / test platform for any
upcoming features that may be needed by mobile, IVI
and possibly
create Tizen Common Nano – terms for discussion sake.
Thanks
Sunil
From: General [mailto:general-boun...@lists.tizen.org] On Behalf Of Schaufler,
Casey
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 10:42 AM
To: Olivier Nyssen; general@lists.tizen.org
Subject: Re: [Tizen General] Tizen Tablet
Tizen Common
On Sunday 26 October 2014 17:36:31 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
Before we go any further, I would like to know if you guys agree with this
basic logic:
1) Tizen Common is a common development / build / test platform for any
upcoming features that may be needed by mobile, IVI, wearables, and other
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 17:36 +0100, Olivier Nyssen wrote:
Before we go any further, I would like to know if you guys agree with
this basic logic:
1) Tizen Common is a common development / build / test platform for
any upcoming features that may be needed by mobile, IVI, wearables,
and other
] On Behalf Of
Schaufler, Casey Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 10:42 AM
To: Olivier Nyssen; general@lists.tizen.org
Subject: Re: [Tizen General] Tizen Tablet
Tizen Common is useful for many things. One of the reasons it is valuable is
that it is not excessively constrained to a particular
On Monday 27 October 2014 08:18:26 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
at this point it's basically not tizen anymore. to run in 4m of ram we're
looking at mcu's and these have (except for the higher end a5 ones in the
arm world) no mmu at all. a linux kernel alone is going to eat up all if
not most of
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com
wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 17:36 +0100, Olivier Nyssen wrote:
Before we go any further, I would like to know if you guys agree with
this basic logic:
1) Tizen Common is a common development / build / test platform for
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Saturday 25 October 2014 05:41:20 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
A new profile is required for specific hardware like a fridge for
instance.
Most Tizen devices must be IoT compatible so we're in Tizen Common
On Saturday 25 October 2014 08:00:40 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Saturday 25 October 2014 05:41:20 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
A new profile is required for specific hardware like a fridge for
instance.
Most
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Saturday 25 October 2014 08:00:40 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Saturday 25 October 2014 05:41:20 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
A
On Saturday 25 October 2014 10:21:25 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
Like I said: why would we need a separate profile for IoT, which will be
-by definition- common to all profiles ?
Because your assumption is not valid. Why do you think IoT will be common to
all profiles? Why do you assume that IoT
Hi Olivier, All,
In my opinion having a separate profile for a Tizen 3 Tablet which is
optimized as a touchscreen control center for IoT makes sense, even as
the next Tizen developer device.
The presentation of Stéphane Desneux during LinuxCon Europe and the one
of Dominig ar Foll during
Hi Leon,
Before we move to the technical details: I'm not sure we really need a
Tablet Profile at this stage. Maybe I'm wrong but Tizen Common would be
perfect for this job imo: a generic profile for a generic device. We need a
nice UI of course but the main question remains: who's going to make
Hi Olivier,
On 2014-10-24 14:07, Olivier Nyssen wrote:
Hi Leon,
Before we move to the technical details: I'm not sure we really need a
Tablet Profile at this stage. Maybe I'm wrong but Tizen Common would
be perfect for this job imo: a generic profile for a generic device.
Tizen:Common is a
Hi Olivier,
On 2014-10-24 17:23, Olivier Nyssen wrote:
Agreed but let's start from Tizen Common. If we add:
Yes but if we modify and extend Tizen:Common then the result will be a
new Tizen profile.
Best regards,
Leon
Links:
--
[1] http://openinterconnect.org/about/
On 25/10/2014 00:24, Leon Anavi wrote:
Hi Olivier,
On 2014-10-24 17:23, Olivier Nyssen wrote:
Agreed but let's start from Tizen Common. If we add:
Yes but if we modify and extend Tizen:Common then the result will be a
new Tizen profile.
answering technically,
well if there is no need to
On 25/10/2014 00:24, Leon Anavi wrote:
On 2014-10-24 17:23, Olivier Nyssen wrote:
Agreed but let's start from Tizen Common. If we add:
Yes but if we modify and extend Tizen:Common then the result will be a
new Tizen profile.
A new profile is required for specific hardware like a
On Saturday 25 October 2014 05:41:20 Olivier Nyssen wrote:
A new profile is required for specific hardware like a fridge for instance.
Most Tizen devices must be IoT compatible so we're in Tizen Common
territory imo
Even IoT will be a profile on top of Common or Common Micro.
--
Thiago
Yep, the screen is indeed smaller than a Gear 2 watch (which has a 320 x
320 resolution) but at least we have a participant in the tablet segment
now, so maybe bigger form factors will be possible.
A dev device with a Gear S display (360 x 480 resolution) would be much
better of course.
The Egg would be a great companion device for a Gear 2 watch btw.
So ideally it would have the same 320 x 320 screen resolution and Samsung
should allow these guys to use SAP (Samsung Accessory Protocol)
http://developer.samsung.com/samsung-gear
Regards,
Olivier
Hi everyone,
This could be a great Tizen dev device imo:
http://www.eggcyte.com/products/
But they need some financing:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2088279700/the-egg-if-you-care-about-it-then-egg-it
A drop in the ocean for Intel imo ;)
Regards,
Olivier
With a screen resolution of 240x320 and 262K colors, I fail to see what
would make the device great as a tablet. Although the idea of a
tamagochi running Linux does lift my spirits a bit.
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 04:51:30 +0200
Olivier Nyssen nysse...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
This could be a
32 matches
Mail list logo
