October 2013, Apache Lucene™ 4.6 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 4.6
Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine
library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly
any application that requires full-text
24 November 2013, Apache Solr™ 4.6 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.6
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted
May 2013, Apache Solr™ 4.3 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.3.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search,
May 2013, Apache Lucene™ 4.3 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 4.3
Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine
library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for
nearly any application that requires full-text
Hey folks,
I added a board report draft for June 2012:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/board-reports/2012/board-report-june.txt
please gimme feedback or change as you like until tomorrow night. The
report is due on Wednesday.
simon
in your lucene distribution you downloaded to obtain the jar file you
should find another jar called lucene-analysis in the contrib section
. put that in your classpatch and you should be ready to go.
simon
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:10 PM, ddweb kara...@siteland.gr wrote:
And how can i do this?
you need to pull in the analysis jar too to get access to the greek analyzer.
simon
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:52 AM, ddweb kara...@siteland.gr wrote:
Hello i use the open source media platform subsonic, that include the lucene
for the search. The problem is that i have problem with the greek
short answer is: yes! common search and indexing classes are
threadsafe! IndexWriter IndexReader (IndexSearcher) can be shared
between threads. Any other particular class you are in doubt with?
simon
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Ilya Zavorin izavo...@caci.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am looking
=== Lucene Status Report: March 2012 ===
TLP
We have added several new PMC members:
* Martijn van Groningen
* Dawid Weiss
* Jan Jøydahl
Trademarks:
We have not made progress on trademarks since the last board report, but
do intend to finish the necessary pieces.
* Project Naming And
Chairs:
* Isabel Drost (Nokia Apache Mahout)
* Jan Lehnardt (CouchBase Apache CouchDB)
* Simon Willnauer (SearchWorkings Apache Lucene)
* Grant Ingersoll (Lucid Imagination Apache Lucene)
* Owen O’Malley (Yahoo Inc. Apache Hadoop)
* Jim Webber (Neo Technology Neo4j)
* Sean Treadway
=== Lucene Status Report: December 2011 ===
TLP
Trademarks:
We have not made progress on trademarks since the last board report, but
do intend to finish the necessary pieces.
* Project Naming And Descriptions :
We believe this is complete, but are still reviewing.
* Website
hey folks,
we lately looked into
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3235 again, an issue
where a class using ConcurrentHashMap hangs / deadlocks on specific
JVMs in combination with specific CPUs. It turns out its a JVM bug in
Sun / Oracle Java 1.5 as well as Java 1.6. Its apparently
hey, see my comments inline...
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:03 PM, xdzgor1 p...@alpha-solutions.dk wrote:
Hi, can someone please help me with the following simple example. Why does my
search not result in a hit?
Analyzer indexAnalyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_33);
IndexWriterConfig
hey,
concurrency should not be an issue for lucene. Can you provide some
more information on what you are doing?
1 to 2 seconds sounds very very long for a single user. Are you doing
something like opening the indexreader for each request?
I'd also be interested in what kind of queries you are
alright :)
This is going to kill your app :)
Directory dir = FSDirectory.open(new File(indexDir));
IndexSearcher is = new IndexSearcher(dir);
you should try to keep this searcher open as long as possible and
reuse it. Its threadsafe so you can simply pass it to all your
searches.
Once you
I am going to send / submit this tomorrow.
simon
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
done!
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
yeah good points I will add something...
simon
On Thu, Sep
yeah good points I will add something...
simon
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: FYI, I plan to submit the board report for September [1] by Sept. 10th
: if nobody objects.
two things we might wnat to consider adding:
* something in
done!
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
yeah good points I will add something...
simon
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: FYI, I plan to submit the board report for September [1] by Sept
thanks andi!
Simon
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Simon Willnauer wrote:
hey folks,
I just committed a board report draft to our svn. There is still a
todo open for PyLucene since I am not on top of the development down
there. Andy
so here are a couple of things that I wonder about:
1. are you using NFS or any other network file system?
2. is it possible to enable the infoStream on the IW and get the output?
3. is it possible that the lucene index is deleted somehow by a second
process while we are flushing?
simon
On Fri,
Hey,
are you guys calling IW#rollback() by any chance? the rollback will
close you IW and you have to reopen it on the index. If so in which
case are you calling rollback?
simon
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:03 PM, drazen.nis d.niko...@youngculture.com wrote:
Hello,
We are using single instance
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:17 PM, raphael812 or...@eecs.qmul.ac.uk wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am quite new to lucene and i am using the book lucene in action to learn.
I need help in extracting the body content of a html page using tika. The
implementation from the book only extracts the html's
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:38 AM, deniz denizdurmu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to implement a plugin and as there is lack of documentation (
well there are some but no example code ) i stared checking the source
code...
and while checking, i have seen a class importing
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
OK, I intend to file the report in SVN tomorrow morning.
+1
On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Please fill out
Hey Arvind,
can you give us a little more details about the encryption agent you
are using so I can try to reproduce this problem.
CAn you also provide some info which lucene version you are using?
simon
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:19 AM, arvindjce arvind...@gmail.com wrote:
We have the
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Lucener's,
Thank you to everyone who has participated in this thread and the many others
during this time. I know it's been heated at times as well as painful. I
also know this is a pretty big and broad community
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen several people note that IRC is not logged. Fine. LOG IT.
I see absolutely no reason for you guys not to set up logging for the
channel that you use. We do this for Subversion development:
hey folks,
BerlinBuzzwords 2011 is close only 33 days left until the big Search,
Store and Scale opensource crowd is gathering
in Berlin on June 6th/7th.
The conference again focuses on the topics search,
data analysis and NoSQL. It is to take place on June 6/7th 2011 in Berlin.
We are looking
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Apr 26, 2011, at 8:43 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
But, this is important context to the discussion. Unfortunately, to
the uninformed community, asf board, members etc, my behavior likely
appears very irrational: but
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Doron Cohen cdor...@gmail.com wrote:
-1 for unmerge.
Another thing to keep in mind is that Solr can be considered not just an
application that uses Lucene, but rather the *ideal* application layer for
Lucene. Solr is basically an awesome example of what
gives
a presentation on how to integrate Solr with J2EE applications.
The second day features presentations by Jonathan Gray on Facebook's use of
HBase in their Messaging architecture, Dawid Weiss, Simon Willnauer
and Uwe Schindler are
showing the latest Apache Lucene developments, Mark Miller
Maybe you can use WhitespaceAnalyzer to just split on whitespace.
That analyzer at least does not lowercase
you should maybe tell us more about what you wanna do in terms of
analysis to give you good advice.
asking on java-u...@lucene.apache.org might also yield better results
this
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:02 AM, aneuryzma patrick.divia...@gmail.com wrote:
It is not clear to me how these parameters of
org.apache.lucene.document.Field class
exactly work:
Field.Store.YES / NO
If I set them to NO, then I don't save the content itself but only metadata
about it ?
YES
maybe you should ask on the Digester list for advice
simon
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:54 AM, aneuryzma patrick.divia...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using Apache Commons Digester together with Lucene to index a xml
collection. Some fields in the colleciton are not always available. See
example:
Welcome! ;)
Simon
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote:
Welcome Stanisław and Dawid!
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 1:13 PM
To: general@lucene.apache.org; d...@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Fernando ferna...@digitaldoc.com.br wrote:
Hi, i upgrade my app, from lucene 2.4.1 to 2.9.1,
Now I am having serious problems on my linux clients,
index of the files not being released.
I have been see the FAQ, but im closing de Writers, and Searchers,
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Dec 30, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: My vote is -1 to the current resolution, because it lacks a plan for
: continuity for the userbase. It seems that although development has
: stagnated, there is
+1
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 29, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Dec 29, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Resolution:
Whereas the Lucene.NET project has stagnated due to lack of committer
activity and,
Whereas
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Is in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/board-reports/2010/board-report-dec.txt
Comments and additions welcome. In particular, I need reports from PyLucene
and Lucene.NET.
-Grant
Grant,
maybe I miss
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Michael Busch busch...@gmail.com wrote:
The PMC has accepted Adriano Crestani as Lucene/Solr committer!
Welcome on board, Adriano!!
Welcome Adriano!
simon
Michael
PS: Adriano, it's tradition to introduce yourself here as a new committer!
:)
Welcome Steven!
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/22/10 9:19 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the PMC has accepted Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr
committer!
Welcome Steven!
Welcome Steven!
- Mark
Thanks Chris!
simon
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
Ok, so it sounds like Grant, Uwe, Simon, Yonik (via IRC) and myself are
all willing to be added as moderators for all of these lists. (some folks
are already moderators for some lists)
I
No problem hoss - I will too.
simon
On 8/19/10, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
I could also help its not much traffic to moderate! But my priority will be
on migrating Hudson to the FreeBSD VM.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Technically, it's clear that Lucy is taking an innovative and
well-thought-out approach, building a search engine that folds in
what's been learned from all the painful experiences of those before
it. Marvin
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: See 3.0.2: http://s.apache.org/6kf
: vs. 3.0.1: http://s.apache.org/t5
Ugh... ok, well i guess the precident has allready been
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Simon Willnauer wrote:
I can not commit to this part of the repo but here is a diff
I just updated the PyLucene section and took the opportunity to paste in
your changes as well (rev 953471).
Thanks
is in progress. The community is working
+towards a 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 release.
Added Simon Willnauer as a committer
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Checked into
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/board-reports/2010/board-report-june.txt
Need
Congrats Uwe!! :)
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Welcome, Uwe!
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/1/10 4:05 AM, Grant Ignersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted to add Uwe Schindler to
the
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Nóirín Shirley for the ApacheCon 2010 Planning Team
planners-2010...@apachecon.com
Date: March 15, 2010 7:22:14 PM EDT
To: p...@apache.org, gene...@incubator.apache.org
Subject:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Mar 12, 2010, at 1:39 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:39 AM, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com wrote:
Hows that?
Which vote has been passed? 1,2 or 3?
Considering how much has been discussed
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:39 AM, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com wrote:
Hows that?
Which vote has been passed? 1,2 or 3?
Considering how much has been discussed / altered in email threads, what's
actually been voted upon?
The proposition is definitely unclear, and needs full fleshing out
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Claudio R user...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Hi Robert.
The Solr's SynonymFilter recommends expanding the synonym
at indexing time. But it will make my index grow much. I can do a
replace in the
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: from Solr into Lucene don't need to be in there. All of a sudden I'm
agreeing
: with Hoss about goals rather than actual steps ;) Because those points are
not
: important to this vote at all - they are more
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
- And last but not least the whole merge should be done *after* the
current code bases are again closer to each other, especially Flex
IMO the only downside is that we risk a longer release cycle if we
merge. I requires a certain level of discipline but has this been the
case since ever?! Anything else seems to be a win to both communities
and I personally would love to see the communities coming closer
again. I was working on
+1
So many people ask me when Solr will have all the lucene features and
how quickly solr keeps up. If we can make it somehow I think it would
be a huge improvement. Except of mark millers resume :)
simon
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Fri, Feb
Mike, thanks for moving out of the JIRA issue. For completeness I just
add the link to the issue where this thread started though. --
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2279
I also think we need a solution for this problem but it does not seem
to be that easy. Would moving the analysis
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Michael McCandless wrote:
I think, in order to stop duplicating our analysis code across
Nutch/Solr/Lucene, we should separate out the analyzers into a
standalone package, and maybe as its own sub-project under the Lucene
+1 from here
I put the 3.0.1 into several apps and everything seems to run smoothly
for the last couple of days. All tests pass
simon
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
+0. I only have time to read the release documents. Uwe's apologies were
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 7:15 PM, Mohammed Aziz Parande wrote:
Hi,
I am a graduate student in the Department of Information Systems at the
University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). I am doing research in the
area
Congrats, Mark!!
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the Lucene PMC has elected to add Mark Miller to its
ranks in recognition of his longstanding contributions to the Lucene
community as a committer on both Lucene Java and
I would extremely prefer a common well know name instead of Cartensian
tiers. While the API is still in flux changing the name is not that
much of a deal either. Either grid or tiles is fine for me though
while I would prefer the most common of the two - grid seems to be the
better choice though.
/3_0_0/api/core/org/apache/lucene/search/MultiTermQuery.html
and friends for details.
Simon
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Claudio,
your query setup is fine for what you trying to do but as you are
using wildcards lucene internally
Hey folks, has anybody a vectorized lucene logo or does something like
that exists somewhere in public?
Thanks in advance,
simon
Thanks for the pointers!
simon
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/site/publish/images/logo.eps
Or, more simply:
http://lucene.apache.org/images/logo.eps
Doug
Isabel, you rock! :)
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Isabel Drost isa...@apache.org wrote:
wget
http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/ApacheCon-2009-Lucene-Hadoop-und-mehr-852929.html
grep 'hea' ApacheCon-2009-Lucene-Hadoop-und-mehr-852929.html
Have fun,
Isabel
Hi all,
I just wanna give you a heads-up for an upcoming event.
Apache Lucene and Apache Mahout will be present at the openexpo (free
open source conference) in Karlsruhe (Nov 15./16. 2009).
http://it-republik.de/konferenzen/opensourceexpo09/
You can meet us at the Lucene /. Mahout booth, would
.
Thanks
Simon Willnauer wrote:
There is no API which supports what you are asking for but building
yourself should not be a problem at all.
simon
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM, diego.cassin...@mercadolibre.com
wrote:
Why not? Indexing is very fast.
--Original Message
The common approach is to use a UUID field in the index and run an
updateDocument with a delete term holding the UUID for a document.
That way only the latest added document for a UUID is gonna end up in
the index.
simon
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:41 AM, tarunsapra t.sapr...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no API which supports what you are asking for but building
yourself should not be a problem at all.
simon
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM, diego.cassin...@mercadolibre.com wrote:
Why not? Indexing is very fast.
--Original Message--
From: tarunsapra
To:
+1
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote:
+1
Otis
--
Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls
Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR
- Original Message
From: George Aroush
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:35 AM, leibnizse3g2...@gmail.com wrote:
i saw someone said that this fieldNor factor is consisted out of :docboost
,fieldboost and lengthNorm.
but i tried to computed like this,but the result is not the same as lucene's
output.
The factors you use seem to be correct
Hey Shalin,
this url is an admin only url. Try this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORP
Website and mailinglists are out there as well, see:
http://lucene.apache.org/openrelevance/
simon
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Shalin Shekhar
Mangarshalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun
Task status was changed to Fixed 6 hours ago!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2086
we should have
openrelevance-u...@lucene.apache.org
openrelevance-...@lucene.apache.org
by now.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Grant Ingersollgsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Simon,
Any word on
You may subscribe here:
openrelevance-user-subscr...@lucene.apache.org
and
openrelevance-dev-subscr...@lucene.apache.org
simon
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Simon
Willnauersimon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Task status was changed to Fixed 6 hours ago!
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Andrzej Bialeckia...@getopt.org wrote:
Simon Willnauer wrote:
It worked for me, can you please try again and verify.
simon
I confirm it worked for me.
Cool thanks, we should have somebody not being a moderator to confirm too.
simon
--
Best regards
Thanks guys! :) no further confirmation needed.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Michael
McCandlessluc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Marvin Humphreymar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
I've successfully subscribed to both lists.
Me too.
Mike
Willnauer (sim...@apache.org)
simon
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Grant Ingersollgsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 6, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
I'm about to kick off the mailing list request for
openrelevance-u...@lucene.apache.org
We need to announce list moderators
could you please give us more details of you query or an example that
might help to understand what you are trying to do. I had the same
impression as Ted though.
simon
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:28 PM, ywlee522ywlee...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the tip. But, no, it is not same as finding
Hi there,
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Grant Ingersollgsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 2, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
wrote:
The Open Relevance Project vote has passed. Now the fun begins.
To get
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
The Open Relevance Project vote has passed. Now the fun begins.
To get started, I think we need to get some infrastructure in place. I'd
suggest:
1. Subversion (I can take care of this)
2. Mailing list. I think we
+1
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
+1
I think it is a good idea to collect such data that is freely available.
Maybe there will be licensing issues, but this would need to be discussed in
this project.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63,
I wonder if a P2P network would be an option at all? I doubt that P2P
is feasible for 100s of GB but we might get peers with bigger pipes
supporting the ASF.
Providing a Bittorrent download could work as soon as it is boostrapped.
simon
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Grant Ingersoll
Hey there,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:43 AM, apgw anth...@databaserepublic.com wrote:
I am new to Lucene. Is this the right utility to use for the following use
case:
1) Find a search term - eg. 'lithium battery' in some technical rich-text
data (can be in any european language), 4K - 64K
84 matches
Mail list logo
