Hi all,
I'm going to be travelling for the next 5 weeks, with very limited
access to e-mail. So if I don't reply to messages, that's the reason
why.
Ted
-
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe,
!
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 09:42 am, Theodore W. Leung wrote:
Hello all,
Below is a copy of the status report that I submitted to the ASF board.
These reports are going to be submitted on a roughly monthly basis.
I'm
mailing this out to you all so that you can see what's being
In case folks are unaware, registration for ApacheCon has just opened.
This is a great opportunity for people to get together face to face. I
know that many people are constrained in their ability to travel, but I
wanted to make sure that people were aware of the conference.
I hope to see
Hello all,
Below is a copy of the status report that I submitted to the ASF board.
These reports are going to be submitted on a roughly monthly basis. I'm
mailing this out to you all so that you can see what's being reported,
and comment on any issues that you see
Ted
* what code releases
I'm not seeing this behavior.
It looks like index.html hasn't been changed since 7/12/2002
Ted
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 23:46, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
It's the second or third time I forward this to the XML general mailing
list... Is someone still taking care of the main website?
Pier
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 08:08, Andy Clark wrote:
[That thread was getting a bit too deep. ;)]
Ted Leung wrote:
projects that are built on (or using) Xerces. This is the
direction that my NekoHTML parser seems to be leaning as
well.
I would be interested in seeing this make it into
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 00:06, Andy Clark wrote:
Aleksander Slominski wrote:
i would be very interested in making xni2xmlpull into sub-project
of Xerces2 as it would allow users of Xerces 2 to access
and use simple XMLPULL API. my implementation (alpha)
is very small and together with
All the ASF licenses are fine (that was easy). The only questionable
one whether we meet all the requirements of the IBM PL that is used for
JUnit.
We need to look at this one a bit more closely, since junit is used by
many of the projects. Scott, if your time has freed up, could you look
Christian,
E-mail me a zip of the up-to-date docs and I'll make sure they get
posted.
Ted
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 14:09, Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote:
XML Security v1.0.0 Released
We are proud to announce the 1.0.0 final
release of the XML Security package.
Why does the website
Can anyone in cocoon verify the origin of this jar. If we can't, we'll
have to remove it from CVS.
Ted
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 15:56, Theodore W. Leung wrote:
The only commit of the jar was by greenrd, Robin Green.
Robin, can you tell us if you are the sole author of the bugfix? If so
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:24, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 04 Feb 2002, Theodore W. Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a problem caused by importing a copy of ant in the
distribution. The long term solution for this is for the Ant folks
to correctly license their jars.
Could you
My understanding - via Dirk is that according to US law, a file without
a license is undistributable, and that includes our own jars,
unfortunately.
Dirk, can you expand on this if I haven't got it right?
Ted
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 00:42, Vincent Hardy wrote:
Hello,
Following Dirk's email
the
jar file and put each physical files in xml-xerces/c/doc/stylesheets/* , and
then remove the style-apachexml.jar from xml-xerces/tools/jars.
Do we still need to check in the license if we do above (i.e. expand into
physical files like Xerces-J did)?
Thanks!
Tinny
Theodore W. Leung
Hello all,
The PMC has been discussing how to make sure that we deal with the 3rd
party jar issue:
Each member of the PMC is going to take responsibility for a set of 3rd
party jars. On Friday any 3rd party jars which have questionable
license status will be removed from CVS. It should go
The crinson-ant jar appears to be a copy of the ASF crimson parser.
It only appears in xml-batik/lib/build.
This is a problem caused by importing a copy of ant in the
distribution. The long term solution for this is for the Ant folks to
correctly license their jars.
In the mean time,e need
This jar is a package of stylebook stylesheets. It is covered by the ASF
license
It appears in
xml-xerces/java/tools/Attic/style-apachexml.jar,v
and
xml-xerces/c/tools/jars/style-apachexml.jar,v
For Xerces-J, the problem is solved
For Xerces-C we can solve the problem by checking in the
The jar sax-bugfix contains a single class SAXException. This jar
exists only in xml-cocoon/lib.
This appears to be a single bugfix to SAX.
Since SAX is under a no-warranty no-copyright license, I don't think
that much needs to happen here. To really be uptight, we could check in
a copy of
:
On 4 Feb 2002, Theodore W. Leung wrote:
The jar sax-bugfix contains a single class SAXException. This jar
exists only in xml-cocoon/lib.
This appears to be a single bugfix to SAX.
Do we know who did it - that is your authority to talk to.
Since SAX is under a no-warranty
My apologies for being late, I was traveling
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 04:27, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Sam,
Here's my +1...
Scott Boag[]
Ted Leung [+0]
Sam Ruby []
Davanum Srinivas [+1]
Dirk-Willem Van Gulik []
Thanks,
dims
--- Sam Ruby
Patch applied. Working on the html now.
Ted
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 14:21, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Since I don't have sufficient karma to make site changes, here's a diff.
Not sure if I got everywhere I should add information, but then this is
XML, so I should only have to add info in one place,
Hi Neil,
Repost it and I'll approve it. I don't know what happened before. I'll
be looking for it this time.
Ted
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 14:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm certainly not trying to slag anyone--and I hope this isn't taken that
way:-)--but does anyone know who is
I think we need to put up some content on the subproject creation
process.
We also need pointers to the infrastructure stuff at www.apache.org/dev
For people running projects, how to configure their project in bugzilla.
We need to fix the text file version of the charter -- I volunteer to do
On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 13:33, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
[sorry for cross-post: this is a general issue, but I'd like the cocoon
people to know what I'm doing so that they might give me a hand :)]
I started the effort that will, hopefully, bring us a much more useful
documentation system for
+10
You can definitely do the Cocoon stuff way faster than I can, since I
haven't looked at 2.0 at all.
On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 02:27, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I've read the 'xml-deviant' column on xml.com and found it extremely
interesting for a couple of reasons:
1) it's an xml-centric
We are waiting on the faxes...
Ted
On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 07:54, Matt Sergeant wrote:
I think we have 1 more fax that needs to go back. I'd like to get things
moved over by christmas. What's the status on that? Are you just waiting
for us now?
--
!-- Matt --
:-Get a smart net/:-
Sorry for the late reply but I was away.
I'm totally fine with what you wrote below -- I just wanted to make sure
that I understood. And I agree heartily about the MS WSDL
On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 11:46, Sam Ruby wrote:
Theodore W. Leung wrote:
One thing I want to specifically call out
On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 08:04, Sam Ruby wrote:
I have found the discussion on WASP to be a productive one. Now it is time
to move from general discussion to development activities. Here's a recap
of a few conclusions:
Goal 1: achieve a single active SOAP implementation.
There is no
Oh, and I forgot that a version of xml-site that was built using the
stylesheets is up at:
http://www.apache.org/~twl/new-site
On Mon, 2001-11-19 at 16:03, Theodore W. Leung wrote:
I've modified Berin's stylesheets to produce the Mono look that Max
produced. I've checked them into xml-site
, support for SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2, pluggable transport protocols, etc.
Good. That's very sensible.
I think it's a good idea that we formalize a plan to integrate the code
bases.
Anne
-Original Message-
From: Theodore W. Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 05:38, Sam Ruby wrote:
General thoughts:
This is just a poll at this point. A perfectly reasonable response
might be for the PMC to request that consensus be reached first on the
Axis dev mailing list before proceeding to a vote. Three of the five
PMC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/29/2001 09:06:30 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Donald Leslie/CAM/Lotus)
Subject: Re: website++
Theodore W. Leung wrote:
I've done some minimal playing around with the top level website in
xml-site, and have modified
On Fri, 2001-10-26 at 15:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My preliminary reaction:
I agree that a common directory layout is a very good idea, but it appears
to me that we are talking about 3 layouts:
1. the repository
2. the distribution
3. the website
1. The repository is
Okay,
I've done some minimal playing around with the top level website in
xml-site, and have modified the styles to get rid of all the images. A
version of the top level site using this style is viewable at
http://www.apache.org/~twl/new-site/index.html
If people think that this is a good
On Mon, 2001-10-29 at 18:06, Edwin Goei wrote:
Theodore W. Leung wrote:
I've done some minimal playing around with the top level website in
xml-site, and have modified the styles to get rid of all the images. A
version of the top level site using this style is viewable at
http
I spoke on the phone with Peter about this proposal. I think that the
folks involved with this piece of code have already started to do some
of the legwork to form that community. I would expect a suitably
diverse list of committers to be a part of the project submission.
Ted
On Sun,
On Fri, 2001-10-26 at 03:00, Keiron Liddle wrote:
On 2001.10.25 20:41 Ted Leung wrote:
Once upon a time, we had a minimal discussion about adopting the Jakarta
dirlayout
proposal. In conjunction with the message that I just sent about the
website, I'd like to
bring this up again and
36 matches
Mail list logo
