The URI in a namespace declaration is simply a name. It isn't required to
point to anything, and you should never expect that the URI is resolvable.
But quite often it does resolve -- typically to a metadata document, such as
XSD, DTD, WSDL, etc.
Anne
-Original Message-
From: Ken Gross
Tim,
In the first example:
ns:elemA xmlns:ns=urn:myNS
elemB/ !-- this elem would implicitly be in the 'ns' namespace --
/ns:elemA
ElemB is either unqualified or it is qualified by the default namespace (the
xmlns=some-uri declaration, if there is one). There's no assumption that
it belongs
You also need to make sure that you unsubscribe using the same email address
that you subscribed with.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Stricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Removal
Scott Dewitt wrote:
requested that the Axis team look at this code before we proceed further. We
haven't heard much discussion since then.
Regards,
Anne
-Original Message-
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Anne Thomas
-project.
Thank you very much for your attention to and consideration for this
proposal.
We look foward to your questions, comments, or concerns.
Anne Thomas Manes
CTO, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
www.systinet.com
-
In case of troubles
Sorry for cluttering up your mailbox -- I'm not sure why this was sent
around again. As you can see, it was sent it on Monday. We plan to proceed
by submitting the code to the Axis project.
Best regards,
Anne
-Original Message-
From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [POLL] WASP Lite on Apache?
Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
Stefano,
I'm pleased that you think it's a good thing.
To clarify: I was commenting Sam's note on I am looking forward
to increased synergy
Stefano,
I'm pleased that you think it's a good thing.
We first thought of submitting WASP Lite to Axis, but after consideration
determined that this approach would be too disruptive and technically
challenging. WASP Lite is a complete code base, and it would be very
difficult to attempt to
-project.
Thank you very much for your attention to and consideration for this
proposal.
We look foward to your questions, comments, or concerns.
Anne Thomas Manes
CTO, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
www.systinet.com
-
In case of troubles
+1
Anne Thomas Manes
CTO, Idoox
-Original Message-
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [POLL] UDDI4J on Apache?
Background:
UDDI4J is an existing Open Source project, hosted on IBM DeveloperWorks
10 matches
Mail list logo