On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I
would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
(i'm really short of time ATM so apologies in advance if i'm very slow
to respond)
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 13:11, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
The IPMC is in charge of its operation. It
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
I personally think that the exit criteria are good as they are (in
hindsight, Abdera is a good example of a project that graduated
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Joe Schaefer asked if he could set up the mailing lists this weekend.
The discussion seemed to end, with no particular opposition, so I
filed an Infrastructure ticket to track the creation of the mailing
lists:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
IIRC, Martijn has offered a proper legal review in the place of a
release.
This sounded pretty reasonable to me. I would agree to that.
Yup. I've already stated that I have no problems with running
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
IMHO a podling should know how to cut an ASF release
the easiest way to demonstrate this knowledge is to cut a release
but it's not the only way.
I don't have an argument with any of those
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
Adam Wojtuniak contributed an implementation of the OSGi User Admin
specification to Felix. This message is a request for IP clearance
verification. The pertinent information is here:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
When we discussed graduation requirements on the incubator general list, the
idea was to have the incubator review a release made by the team, and review
the process of releasing.
my exams are next week but should
i've had time to take a brief look at the mailing lists and IMHO this
matter needs to be taken private (and i started the balls rolling for
that). i will issue a formal veto with both IPMC and legal hats on in
due course. i just wanted to know that i'm going to unsubscribe this
email address from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
donninginfamous flame proof bootsdonning
i'm really sorry to have to do this but...
having taken a quick look into the background, i feel i have to use
binding vetos (legal and ipmc) on all public variations of this proposal
and take all further
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I've been informed (thanks justin) that the legal advise on Esme is that
it's fine to go ahead with the proposal as specified. since the veto
was originally conditional (on that) it's technically invalid and so the
vote can be tallied.
If there's
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
For most projects they just put a URL in the jira, and Joe just imports it.
So, is this just a failure of the documentation to reflect what is
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
For OODT, we think we want to import the prior history of the project
into the podling via a Subversion dump file. However, in:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump
it says:
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Matt Hogstrom m...@hogstrom.org wrote:
I downloaded one of the tar balls and did some spot checking for licenses and
verified pgp sigs.
+1
+1
well done
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 Graduation
[ ] -1 Hold, and continue incubating
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote:
[X] +1 to recommend UIMA's graduation
[ ] 0 don't care
[ ] -1 no, don't recommend yet, (because...)
a good job done by all :-)
- robert
-
To
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Gav... ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
snip
[X] - +1 - Graduate Log4PHP as a sub-project of Apache Logging.
[ ] - +/-0 - Don't care, whatever the majority decides.
[ ] - -1 - Strongly object to this graduation (because ...
kudos to everyone who helped get this
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Eric Sammer esam...@cloudera.com wrote:
Incubators:
I can't find an appropriate policy on the licensing requirements of
ancillary files like BUILD or CHANGES files that are commonly distributed
with releases. I'm specifically looking at the somewhat vague and
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
The butler did it.
:-)
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
and the slights of the past, quite frankly, we aren't going to
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:59 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
(IMHO BUILDING and CHANGES are corner cases. I incline towards adding
license headers unless they are clearly trivial.)
I
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote:
snip
On the spirit of better 'ask for fogiveness than ask for permission'
I added my name to the proposal.
:-)
:-)
Robert
-
To unsubscribe,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/06/2011 14:43, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Simon Brouwersimon.o...@xs4all.nl wrote on 06/02/2011 09:21:53 AM:
snip
What isn't clear to me are things like the following:
1) A strong QA member, who does manual
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Andreas Kuckartz a.kucka...@ping.de wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 18:09, schrieb Jukka Zitting:
I wouldn't be too quick to throw away this opportunity to reunite the
related communities.
If the differences truly are insurmountable, I'd like to see that
explained in the
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Allen Pulsifer wrote:
As a long time member of the OpenOffice.org community, I would like to
offer
my thoughts on the Oracle/IBM proposal.
Thanks for the very well-written and well-reasoned post.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:22 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Allen Pulsifer pulsi...@openoffice.org wrote on 06/02/2011 06:58:45 PM:
snip
Second, if Apache takes on OpenOffice, it will instantly become the
Apache
project with the largest number of end-users (if you include the number
of
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hello,
Hi Florian
I hope you don't mind if I jump in to the discussion. The views shared here
are not any official TDF statement, but rather solely my own ones, acting as
a volunteer who has been
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:59 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote on 06/03/2011 11:09:23 AM:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org
wrote:
This is why, inside the ASF, we expect individuals to represent the
communities
:-)
Noisy and open - everyone with an opinion is welcome :-)
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on 2011-06-04 09.14:
The TDF is in no position to accept a major donation of either
copyright or code today. Apache is.
Why?
AIUI [1] the TDF is not a legal entity today and is still in the
process
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:40, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
We already had subversion for some time as the repository for the main
code and it
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I've lost the thread on this,
it's noisy and open :-)
(but it's good to factor out new threads with good subjects)
but I thought that one observation was about the dependencies in
OpenOffice.org (and
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 01:07, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
Also, besides main apps, is Oracle donating it's Oracle OOo extensions?
Such as: PDF Import, Presenter Console, WebLog Publisher, Professional
Template
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Ian Lynch wrote (04-06-11 14:39)
On 4 June 2011 13:30, Cor Nouwsoo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote (04-06-11 13:35)
Is there any reason to believe that the Apache License, Version 2.0 is
not an appropriate choice in
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hi,
Greg Stein wrote on 2011-06-04 16.28:
snip
Personally, I think Oracle's choice had more to do with IBM's
recommendation, than taxes.
+1
I tend to agree.
IMO it's all about governance.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 13:54, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
...
That point has been repeaded over and over again, but basically you are
saying everyone Do not set up your own foundation at all, we
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/02/2011 09:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hi Italo
Let's look at it this way: Pretend that when things starting going
south in OOo, but before TDF was formed, Oracle had done what it
just did: donate the code and
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Andy Brown wrote:
Hi all.
Hi Andy
This is my fist post here, been lurking from day one.
And today you've become a contributor :-)
As a user I am trying to understand somethings that are going on here.
1:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Steve Loughran ste...@apache.org wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:31 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
The butler did it.
yeah, the new butler, jenkins, killed the old one, hudson as hudson was
getting too noise for a staff member of the household.
ROFL :-)
Robert
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought I'd reintroduce myself.
Welcome Louis :-)
I first posted last week but over the weekend, was a) busy with other
pressing things, and b) wanted to let others, especially new voices,
speak—now is the time to
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Christoph Noack christ...@dogmatux.com wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Christoph
I hope you don't mind that another new face appears on this mailing
list. I followed some of the discussion during the last days and like to
add that I'm generally happy to see the
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/7 Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com:
On 7 June 2011 16:27, Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/7 Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com:
On 7 June 2011 16:08, Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:49 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
This is for the proposal, the Nominated Mentors section.
My observation, after seeing the topics that seem to be getting the most
attention from the IPMC members on this list, is that in the the Podling
we will want to pay special
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I say that the sooner one can move to uni-directional flows with the
bi-directionals out in customization and adoption layers, if anywhere, the
better. It is difficult to conceive of any other way to get on top
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote:
We at Apache don't think that money is evil, but we also believe that seeing
our code in wide use is more important than money. OpenOffice.org is
important to the Developing World, some of whom will pay for convenience. I
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote (08-06-11 11:03)
On 06/08/2011 04:16 AM, Christian Lippka wrote:
Moin Moin [1],
my name is Christian Lippka and I work on the donnated code base since
1998
[..]
I just wanted to say that this is one
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:12 PM, IngridvdM ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I would like to humbly beg you people from Apache for giving a chance to
those who are willing to join
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Nóirín Plunkett noi...@apache.org wrote:
Andy,
Fáilte! Sounds like you get the Apache Way just great :-)
+1
I don't really have any background in this, but [... list of awesome
things you've already done.]
Willing hands are always welcome, and a dose of
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[X] +1 Accept Bigtop for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to Bigtop incubation
[ ] -1 Reject Bigtop for incubation
(binding)
Robert
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Correct. 99% of the time the private list is
used for voting in new committers/PPMC members.
+1
(Some established projects elect committers on public lists but this
requires high levels of trust and isn't
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
we copy a KEYS file into that directory upon succesful VOTE of the release
artifacts (which also include the KEYS file).
Perhaps, but the point we're getting at was explicitly stated by Benson,
The goal here is
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[X ] +1 Accept Deft for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to Deft incubation
[ ] -1 Reject Deft for incubation
(binding)
Robert
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
(Apologies if I've missed any changes in Apache policy - please jump
in and correct me)
1. as I understand it, notices and licenses for 3rd party products should
not go in NOTICE and LICENSE, but should go in
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Mohammad Islam misla...@yahoo.com wrote:
snip
[ X] +1 Accept Oozie for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to Oozie incubation
[ ] -1 Reject Oozie for incubation
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Suresh
I am interested to contribute to this project, since any one did not vote
yet, can I add my name to the Initial Committers?
The proposal is fixed when the VOTE thread starts (so that everyone is
voting on the
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Dan,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
...Relating to the NOTICE file, it would seem that [1] is inconsistent with
[2]. If these discussions on legal did occur, then it
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de wrote:
Hi,
ATOS Origin donated some code to become part of the Apache PDFBox project
[1]. I volunteered to get this done and I'd like to start the IP-Clearance
process as described at [2]. I've learned that I'll need
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
2008-01-06 rat
done
(Doh! Originally forgot to update the status document)
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[X] +1 Accept ODF Toolkit for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to ODF Toolkit incubation
[ ] -1 Reject ODF Toolkit for incubation
(binding)
Robert
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
As can be seen elsewhere, I'm on a self-given mission to clean up the
history of podlings by getting them to sign off on the following
checklist item:
Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
You will find here[1] an ip clearance form in order to move
tomcat-maven-plugin from mojo project hosted at codehaus to Apache
Tomcat project.
Related vote threads in tomcat dev ml [2] and in Mojo project [3]
Let me
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Whirr podling joined the incubator in May 2010. Since then it has
made 5 releases following Apache guidelines, added 4 new committers,
and added 3 new PPMC members. The community is healthy and growing,
and
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Whirr podling joined the incubator in May 2010. Since then it has
made 5 releases following Apache guidelines, added
Rat is (now) one of the oldest podlings, and has an unusually high
proportion of experience Apache contributors. The community and code
are small (perhaps too small) for a top level project (TLP).
Rat tools conceptually run downstream from the build in the continuous
delivery space, assisting
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
Agree that the scope of Rat alone is limited. You mean if Rat proposed
to graduate as Apache Tools (or even Apache Infrastructure Tools)? Rat
could start as the TLP and later become a sub project once other tools
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote:
The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
votes, and no -1 votes.
The binding +1 votes:
Chris A. Mattmann
Mohammad Nour El-Din
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+1 for TLP and I could also help out with coding.
Great :-)
Hope to see you on the lists sometime soon...
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Ok.
I have patched the site and noticed the lazy consensus note.
But I'm puzzled here as tomcat folks ask an approval from incubator PMC [1].
Approval is needed but AIUI the IPMC uses lazy consensus [2] in this case
I see it
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2011/8/9 Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Ok.
I have patched the site and noticed the lazy consensus note.
But I'm puzzled here
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2011/8/10 Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com:
snip
The copyright section [1] still includes the sentence explaining how
to record a grant [2]. If the copyright is owned by ASF committers and
all
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for review.
Updated again :-)
[1] looks fine to me now
Unless anyone jumps in an issue before 1200UTC Saturday, 13 August
(let's say) the Tomcat PMC should consider the IP cleared
Robert
[1]
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:38 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
There are quite a few web-sites still under /www/incubator.apache.org/
that are for graduated podlings, as well as a few sites marked 'old':
For example:
467 ./old-activemq
130790 ./activemq
drwxrwsr-x 34 apbackup
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:16 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
AIUI, DISCLAIMER files (*) should be present alongside NOTICE and
LICENSE files in all releases and in the top-level SVN directory, and
the disclaimer text should be prominently displayed on the podling
web-site.
These items are
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote:
[X] +1, graduate OGNL into Commons
[] -1, no, don't graduate, because:
(binding)
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Yes, complying with the branding requirements absolutely should be an exit
criteria.
+1
We should also update:
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
To explain a little bit about the pmc guidelines.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#request-mailing-lists
Can anyone explain what
IPMC Member
This needs to be executed by an IPMC member. Mentors are drafted on
the IPMC so this will typically
be
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Alasdair Nottingham n...@apache.org wrote:
The word typically suggests to me that normally a mentor does this, but any
willing IPMC member can do this and that is no problem.
+1
The whole section is [DRAFT] so it might well be a formatting issue.
Looks like
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Alasdair Nottingham n...@apache.org wrote:
The word typically suggests to me that normally a mentor does this, but any
willing IPMC member can do
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO the champion helps clarify the incubator
Hi Sander
I'm glad you asked these questions here: asking well researched
questions is the best way to improve our process and documentation
but just for the record, the legal-discuss list[1] is the right place
for projects to ask almost all questions about copyright (being
public, it's not
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
On most months, I have to chase down missing reports.
snip
RAT was discussing graduation, but still needs to report.
Apologies. For podlings looking to graduate soon, monthly reporting is
probably a good idea but I
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:55 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
The incubator site has an .htaccess file containing redirects for many
of the graduated podlings.
However, not all graduated podlings are in the file; the following are
missing:
[ snip ]
Should
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:
Please review the following contribution for IP clearance:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-service-diagnostics.html
Approval is by lazy consensus. If anyone has any comments, please jump in.
Robert
The trademark task[1] seemed a little dated to me - especially since
the brand team started focusing on trademarks[2] - and poorly
documented. So, I started looking into improvements...
(Apologies in advance for presenting my views here on some initial
discussions on the private trademark lists.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
The trademark task[1] seemed a little dated to me - especially since
the brand team started focusing on trademarks[2] - and poorly
documented. So, I started looking into improvements...
(Apologies
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
Opinions? Objections
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote:
Hi all,
thanks Jukka for your view on this issue and thank you Benson for bringing
this topic up.
I am one of the Empire-db committers and certainly we would appreciate it
very much if there is a way for us to
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
The current RAT situation leads me to suggest that we graduate Empire.
As a mentor, I'd characterize Empire-Db as a project that was long ago
ready, save for the same issue as RAT: a small group that grows very,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi
raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps I'm biased here (and I'm also an ASF newbie), but, coming from many
one-band-man projects I feel 5 diverse, active and regular committers
that can keep their user base happy is more than enough to be
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi
raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin said:
[...] Self-organising communities are only sustainable with a big
enough population.
I would also add that enough is a relative measure. Maybe (just maybe)
for empiredb enough is 5
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:55 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that using kill search is probably
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Unless anyone jumps in soon, I'll set up a Suitable Names Search
JIRA project
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH
Please jump in to fill out details and permissions
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Unless anyone jumps in soon, I'll set up a Suitable Names Search
JIRA project
https
The copyright years stamped onto every incubator page should probably
be updated. For some reason, non-ascii characters are stomped when I
run the site build so I'd be really grateful if someone could update
the site.vsl (or explain how I can stop the stomping).
Cheers
Robert
Index:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
2009-02-09 kato
I'm comfortable that this is safe enough copyright-wise. I would
prefer the podling community to do the checking themselves but it's
stalled until the JCR is sorted out.
Robert
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
2009-02-09 kato
I'm comfortable that this is safe enough copyright-wise. I would
prefer the podling community to do
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi...
The idea sounds good in general more specifically that should be clear
and documented on the incubator site for future
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Unless
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
+1 to the JIRA project and the notifications coming here. Thanks for
driving this one!
I've done some customisation on PODLINGNAMESEARCH[1] (Hopefully Noel
will forgive me for assigning him as project lead without
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 4:27 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
Even if the problem is fixed for some or all systems, I suggest we
keep the target so it can be invoked directly.
i.e. the target that does the work should be unconditional; it can be
called via a
1 - 100 of 1269 matches
Mail list logo
