Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Xorg-server-1.14.1.901 Fails Emerge

2013-06-06 Thread David Klann
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 05:26:34 + (UTC) you coerced some electrons to say: Dale posted on Wed, 05 Jun 2013 04:16:43 -0500 as excerpted: Frank Peters wrote: On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 06:00:01 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: But xorg-server-1.14.1.901 is definitely

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Xorg-server-1.14.1.901 Fails Emerge

2013-06-05 Thread Frank Peters
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 06:00:01 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: The actual error will be printed above that. Depending on how many make-jobs you are running and some other things, it could actually be QUITE far above that. ... Which means... if you're trying to build with gcc

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Xorg-server-1.14.1.901 Fails Emerge

2013-06-05 Thread Frank Peters
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 03:25:29 -0400 Frank Peters frank.pet...@comcast.net wrote: But, I then installed gcc-4.7.3 in a different slot and tried again to compile. This also failed but the error seems to be a bit different: common/.libs/libcommon.a(xf86Events.o): In function `xf86Wakeup':

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Xorg-server-1.14.1.901 Fails Emerge

2013-06-05 Thread Frank Peters
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 06:00:01 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: But xorg-server-1.14.1.901 is definitely built/installed/running fine here! Thanks for your help in this matter. Your advice allowed me to locate the exact error, and after some searching I believe that I have

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Xorg-server-1.14.1.901 Fails Emerge

2013-06-05 Thread Dale
Frank Peters wrote: On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 06:00:01 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: But xorg-server-1.14.1.901 is definitely built/installed/running fine here! Thanks for your help in this matter. Your advice allowed me to locate the exact error, and after some searching I

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Xorg-server-1.14.1.901 Fails Emerge

2013-06-05 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Frank Peters frank.pet...@comcast.net wrote: Once again, my decision to avoid the (to me) unnecessary complications of UDEV has got me into trouble. It seems that developers just assume that everyone uses UDEV and they will, inadvertently or otherwise, overlook