Peter Volkov posted on Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:09:04 +0400 as excerpted:
One of the huge benefits in using git would be really fast emerge
--syncs. Not having some kind of system for migrating users to git
seems like a lot of the benefits are lost.
Is git faster then rsync? I've never done any
On 2011-06-02 8:09 AM, Peter Volkov wrote:
ChangeLog files are text to be distributed to our users so they are
completely independent of vcs we use.
Just ditch the Changelogs and be done with it. The only objection I
know is that changelogs act as a NEWS file. Well, it is not a good
enough
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 01-06-2011 19:50, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
The current situation is:
(a) Not dire.
(b) Not urgent.
(c) has irked enough developers and users that people pushed council to
update the policy about the
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:35:24 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
(c) has irked enough developers and users that people pushed
council to update the policy about the use of ChangeLogs.
Yes, and I'm surprised that these same developers pushed towards a
negative solution (kick
On 06/02/11 09:40, Eray Aslan wrote:
Is git faster then rsync? I've never done any checks but it'll be
surprising if it will.
Git usually is faster - except the initial clone. Basically, rsync
protocol scales with the project size not with change size.
We're discussing performance of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-06-2011 15:34, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:27:04 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to just trust devs to use common sense in what
gets into ChangeLogs, and actually be grateful about if
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
(c) has irked enough developers and users that people pushed council to
update the policy about the use of ChangeLogs.
Yes,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/06/2011 04:08 μμ, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Пнд, 30/05/2011 в 14:55 -0700, Brian Harring пишет:
The problem is, that's a *fuzzy* definition.
Ok, let's start with something and then we'll add more items if
required. Currently I'd like to
On 06/01/2011 06:15 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 01/06/2011 04:08 ¼¼, Peter Volkov wrote:
=4, 30/05/2011 2 14:55 -0700, Brian Harring ?8H5B:
The problem is, that's a *fuzzy* definition.
Ok, let's start with something and then we'll add more items if
required. Currently I'd like to
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:15:31PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 01/06/2011 04:08 , Peter Volkov wrote:
?? ??, 30/05/2011 ?? 14:55 -0700, Brian Harring ??:
The problem is, that's a *fuzzy* definition.
Ok, let's start with something and then we'll add more items if
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:27:04 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to just trust devs to use common sense in what
gets into ChangeLogs, and actually be grateful about if they take the
time to sensor the crap out from it, and scrap the whole topic?
This whole
Am Mittwoch 01 Juni 2011, 17:27:04 schrieb Samuli Suominen:
Wouldn't it be better to just trust devs to use common sense in what
gets into ChangeLogs, and actually be grateful about if they take the
time to sensor the crap out from it, and scrap the whole topic?
The problem is, not everyone
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch 01 Juni 2011, 17:27:04 schrieb Samuli Suominen:
Wouldn't it be better to just trust devs to use common sense in what
gets into ChangeLogs, and actually be grateful about if they take the
time to sensor
So we come back to the problem being *CVS* not ChangeLog rules.
Well of course we can just tell everyone go look it up on sources.gentoo.org.
However, this is a different discussion.
All this is such a massive waste of time. Can't we just expend this
energy on the move to git?
Ack, this is
Nathan Phillip Brink posted on Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:30:21 -0400 as
excerpted:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:15:31PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 01/06/2011 04:08 , Peter Volkov wrote:
?? ??, 30/05/2011 ?? 14:55 -0700, Brian Harring ??:
The problem is, that's a *fuzzy*
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
So we come back to the problem being *CVS* not ChangeLog rules.
Well of course we can just tell everyone go look it up on
sources.gentoo.org.
However, this is a different discussion.
sources.gentoo.org is a
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
The current every change policy goes overboard, I doubt anyone
disagrees, but it's worth repeating the point someone else made already,
every added exception makes the rule harder to remember. The four
numbered exceptions
Rich Freeman wrote:
I think that we need a simple policy like:
Write up Changelogs for any change that impacts what gets installed on
our user's computers.
Then we can write up some guidelines about how to apply this policy in practice.
I think the problem is that we're getting a bit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-06-2011 19:50, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org
wrote:
So we come back to the problem being *CVS* not ChangeLog rules.
Well of course we can just tell everyone go look it up
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
To be clear I support the goal to move our tree to git.
However, I'd like to point out that simply moving to git will leave us
in the same state. Assuming everyone agrees that git is far more useful
than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-06-2011 22:59, Rich Freeman wrote:
snip
I think the problem is that we're getting a bit legalistic here. I
have no idea why we even needed the policy change. IMHO what should
happen is:
1. Dev does something significant and doesn't
В Срд, 01/06/2011 в 19:37 -0400, Matt Turner пишет:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
To be clear I support the goal to move our tree to git.
However, I'd like to point out that simply moving to git will leave us
in the same state.
++
22 matches
Mail list logo
