[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 2/3] To build ada we need a c++ compiler too

2024-04-26 Thread Arsen Arsenović
Hi, Alfredo Tupone writes: > Signed-off-by: Alfredo Tupone > --- > eclass/toolchain.eclass | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass > index fd820f60f45d..f8e06fa39884 100644 > --- a/eclass/toolchain.eclass > +++

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] To make "tc_has_feature ada" actually work

2024-04-26 Thread Arsen Arsenović
looks OK at a glance, but could you summarize the issues the patch set fixes in the commit messages (and reword them to follow convention generally)? it is important to have context while looking at a git log. Alfredo Tupone writes: > Signed-off-by: Alfredo Tupone > --- >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] To make "tc_has_feature ada" actually work

2024-04-26 Thread Alfredo Tupone
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:34:44 +0200 Arsen Arsenović wrote: > looks OK at a glance, but could you summarize the issues the patch set > fixes in the commit messages (and reword them to follow convention > generally)? it is important to have context while looking at a git > log. > > - IUSE+="

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 2/3] To build ada we need a c++ compiler too

2024-04-26 Thread Alfredo Tupone
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:29:43 +0200 Arsen Arsenović wrote: > > is_ada() { > > gcc-lang-supported ada || return 1 > > - _tc_use_if_iuse ada > > + _tc_use_if_iuse cxx && _tc_use_if_iuse ada > > Is this redundant? Would gcc-lang-supported c++ (called through the > ada support check) not

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/ttytter

2024-04-26 Thread Arthur Zamarin
# Arthur Zamarin (2024-04-26) # Broken and reported as such upstream. EAPI=6. # Removal: 2024-05-26. Bug #912842. net-misc/ttytter OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature