how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger from
running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd includes
some patches so that it can run as non-root and a user requested we make this
the default ... however, i certainly dont want to start adding a
Alec Warner wrote:
The tricky part then is figuring out whether something doesn't dep upon
c-compiler because it doesn't need one or because the ebuilds haven't
been updated.
I'm out of my depth here- I can't see where that would be a problem?
Er, his point being that if you don't do the
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev
Steve Long wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
Er, his point being that if you don't do the upgrade all at once, you
have two classes of package.
1. Packages that don't require C-compiler
2. Packages that don't yet depend upon C-compiler
When doing the upgrade over a period of time the two classes
On Monday 01 January 2007 10:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger
from running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd
includes some patches so that it can run as non-root and a user requested
we make this the
Betelgeuse,
I'll take sqlite if you and I can co-maintain it.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Monday 01 January 2007 10:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger
from running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd
includes some patches so that it can run as non-root and a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger from
running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd includes
some patches so that it can run as non-root and a user requested we
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:46:55 -0800
Mike Doty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does syslog-ng and metalog have similar functionality?
SYNOPSIS
syslog-ng [ -dFsvVy ] [ -f config-filename ] [ -p
pid-filename ] [ -C chroot-dir ] [ -u user ] [ -g group ]
...
-u user, --group=user
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò kirjoitti:
On Monday 01 January 2007 10:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger
from running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd
includes some patches so that it can run as non-root and
Petteri Räty wrote:
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò kirjoitti:
It would be really nice, especially if the adm group could be used to be
able
to read the logs without using root login :)
Why not use the wheel group?
adm is the standard unix group used to access system logs. there's a
few good
On Monday 01 January 2007 19:38, Petteri Räty wrote:
Why not use the wheel group?
wheel can su (and sudo usually); you might want to give an user access to the
logs without using wheel group.
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD,
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 20:14:17 +0100 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Monday 01 January 2007 19:38, Petteri Räty wrote:
| Why not use the wheel group?
|
| wheel can su (and sudo usually); you might want to give an user
| access to the logs without using wheel group.
Then
It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the future.
Regards,
Petteri R=C3=A4ty
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:12:09 +0200 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the
| future.
Better to say, you might soon be able to get away with it, but don't
rely upon it actually working...
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 10:51:56 -0500
Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Betelgeuse,
I'll take sqlite if you and I can co-maintain it.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I can
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:12:09 +0200 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the
| future.
Better to say, you might soon be able to get away with it, but don't
rely upon it actually working...
Well one
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:28:10 +0200 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
| On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:12:09 +0200 Petteri Räty
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the
| | future.
|
| Better to say, you might
Following a discussion in #gentoo-portage earlier this evening, it was
suggested that I send out an RFC email for this. So, does anyone object
to requiring that any variable listed in USE_EXPAND be treated as
incremental, at least as far as profile inheritance is concerned?
--
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:28:10 +0200 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
| On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:12:09 +0200 Petteri Räty
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the
| | future.
Stephen Bennett wrote:
Following a discussion in #gentoo-portage earlier this evening, it was
suggested that I send out an RFC email for this. So, does anyone object
to requiring that any variable listed in USE_EXPAND be treated as
incremental, at least as far as profile inheritance is
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:24:49 -0800
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That means that the base profiles must have a minimal setting that is
added to in lower profiles, rather than a reasonable default that's
entirely reset in lower profiles (perhaps to a smaller setting),
correct?
It
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Miroslav fordforg Šulc. He is
joining the über cool java people. Expect him to spend endless night
battling with the horrors of bundled jars and sucky build systems.
He hails from Beroun, Czech Republic. He owns his own IT company. On the
personal side he is
Robert Buchholz wrote:
A problem package would be one that does not need a C compiler. It can't
be distinguished from the one which was not yet changed to depend on C.
The problem here is that one can not say when the whole tree is updated
to the new standard, because for the packages which
Petteri Räty napsal(a):
He hails from Beroun, Czech Republic. He owns his own IT company. On the
personal side he is married and has a little daughter. He likes soccer,
taking trips on bikes and hiking.
Yay, the Czech beer conspiracy is growing! Welcome!
*plop*
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:40:55 +0200
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Miroslav fordforg Šulc. He is
joining the über cool java people. Expect him to spend endless night
battling with the horrors of bundled jars and sucky build systems.
Welcome aboard,
Stephen Bennett wrote:
The proposal means that all variables listed in USE_EXPAND get handled
exactly as USE does where profile inheritance is concerned. Subprofiles
can add to and remove from the value in the parent profile just as they
can for USE.
Did I misread what you said earlier?
Thanks for the greetings from Czechoslovakia :-)
Jakub Moc wrote:
Petteri Räty napsal(a):
He hails from Beroun, Czech Republic. He owns his own IT company. On the
personal side he is married and has a little daughter. He likes soccer,
taking trips on bikes and hiking.
Yay, the Czech
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:24:03 -0800
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Bennett wrote:
The proposal means that all variables listed in USE_EXPAND get
handled exactly as USE does where profile inheritance is concerned.
Subprofiles can add to and remove from the value in the
Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:24:03 -0800
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Bennett wrote:
The proposal means that all variables listed in USE_EXPAND get
handled exactly as USE does where profile inheritance is concerned.
Subprofiles can add to and remove
Hi,
openmosix has been hardmasked for a long time:
# Tim Yamin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (07 Aug 2006)
# Security mask
# Bugs #135167, #137623, #137626, #138617, #139321,
# #139475, #139641, #140444, #141503, #142616, #142617
sys-kernel/openmosix-sources
sys-cluster/openmosixview
On Monday 01 January 2007 15:12, Petteri Räty wrote:
It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the future.
until it completely works (versus just mostly works), why mention this ? it'd
be better to continue on with the 'dont use subshells' especially since it
hasnt really
On Monday 01 January 2007 12:46, Mike Doty wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger
from running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd
includes some patches so that it can run as non-root and a user requested
Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
openmosix has been hardmasked for a long time:
# Tim Yamin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (07 Aug 2006)
# Security mask
# Bugs #135167, #137623, #137626, #138617, #139321,
# #139475, #139641, #140444, #141503, #142616, #142617
sys-kernel/openmosix-sources
Steve Long wrote:
Robert Buchholz wrote:
The problem here is that one can not say when the whole tree is updated
to the new standard, because for the packages which were not touched, it
could mean that they needed no change or that they were not looked at yet.
I can understand that as a
Petteri Räty wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Robert rbu Buchholz.
Before it's too late, I wanted to send thanks to Jokey who was and is a
great mentor.
And also to all who sent greetings. Hope to see some of you at the next
German conspiracy meeting.
Robert
--
Thanks for the replies; my apologies for the delay in repying
back
Based on the replies, I was able to track the problem down. The cdb
patch is incompatable with the latest version of portage. Removing
that from /etc/portage/modules allows portage to work.
That said, there is still the bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cloos wrote:
Thanks for the replies; my apologies for the delay in repying
back
Based on the replies, I was able to track the problem down. The cdb
patch is incompatable with the latest version of portage. Removing
that from
38 matches
Mail list logo
