On Wednesday 03 January 2007 22:54, Steve Long wrote:
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I know that I'm a bit late on this, but to me the version 2 or later is
a license by itself. Let's call it GPL-RENEW and let the file have
contents like:
This package is licensed with the version x or later clause
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:18:51 +0100
Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that I'm a bit late on this, but to me the version 2 or
later is a license by itself. Let's call it GPL-RENEW and let the
file have contents like:
This package is licensed with the version x or later clause for
Ryan Hill wrote:
Steve Long wrote:
Robert Buchholz wrote:
Since the tree itself is the best database of the packages available,
anything else would be a lot more overhead.
I really don't agree, altho I could well be missing something. Surely there
should be a maintenance/QA database which
Steve Long schrieb:
In terms of maintaining the metadata, am I right in thinking it's all
just kept within the text files in the tree?
Since the tree itself is the best database of the packages available,
anything else would be a lot more overhead.
I really don't agree, altho I could well be
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:00:51 +0100 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Except that a GPL-RENEW tag would be transparent over newer GPL
| releases too.
But it won't be transparent for end users, who will have to accept
weird non-licences in ACCEPT_LICENCES.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail
The day has finally come, and we're ready to do the final migration of
Bugzilla to the new hardware.
This is tentatively scheduled to start at 02h00 UTC on 6th January 2007.
I am estimating 3 hours for all of it, but I hope to have it done is
less than that.
Keep an eye on the #gentoo-dev topic
Robert Buchholz wrote:
I don't want to sound negative and I like the idea a lot, but two things
are on my mind about this:
It should also sync with changes in the tree, like package removals,
additions and package moves.
For sure.
When you're talking about it on ebuild base: When a
According to man portage:
--getbinpkg (-g)
Using the server and location defined in PORTAGE_BINHOST
(see make.conf(5)), portage will download the
information from each binary package found and it will use that
information to help build the dependency
On Thursday 04 January 2007 20:33, Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
Ok, so what is diference?
probably the samething as between -k and -K
-mike
pgp1GupdWafBk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Going into maintenance mode until 2007.1.8, only bugs introduced by
latest changes will be fixed.
Pondering a general revision bump of dev/db/mysql* tomorrow to fix/show
breakage.
cheers
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 04 January 2007 20:33, Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
Ok, so what is diference?
probably the samething as between -k and -K
-mike
A more verbose answer:
-k says use binary packages if possible, otherwise use ebuilds
-K says use only binary packages, fail if you
Hi,
Don't use debug.eclass.
A team of crackpot developers gangbanged the tree (hi beu!) and remove
all the nasty inherit lines, and then Diego added a deprecation message
in the eclass.
People with overlays utilizing debug.eclass will get many annoying
messages prompting them to stop inheriting
12 matches
Mail list logo
