On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
1) Again, it's not a license. It's a copyright notice with a couple
of jokes attached. It contains no statement granting anyone anything
with regard to the copyright of the materials it is attached to. Ask
your lawyer.
Is it even a copyright notice?
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike
About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course
switch not used by default so that's ok.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
this would be for 2007.1+ profiles and we can leave the old things in
place until we phase out 2007.0 and older completely
This is actually something I was already planning on working on setting
up. To avoid conflicting with the current profiles, I was planning on
Ryan Reich wrote:
snip useful discussion that went over my head
If there's interest in incorporating this, I wouldn't mind testing my
idea. Once I get past the initial resistance to doing anything at
all, it's probably two minutes' compilation time plus two more writing
the config files to
Friday, 6. July 2007, Petteri Räty Ви написали:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course
switch not used by default so that's ok.
If this makes
Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike
gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
On Friday, 6. July 2007 10:09, Petteri Räty wrote:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike
About how many packages will break with the new gcc version?
Luca Barbato wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike
gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
I see they got around to adding the
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike
-DRAC-WAS-HERE == -O4 now?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 00:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
Been using it for a few weeks on ~x86-fbsd without issue now.
Any chance you could add a patch
Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT=fetch? Would someone be kind
enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
of context / I'm overlooking something. Now, it's RESTRICT=mirror.
Also, I failed to see such
Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT=fetch? Would someone be kind
enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
of context / I'm overlooking something. Now, it's
Am Freitag, 6. Juli 2007 14:09 schrieb Samuli Suominen:
Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT=fetch? Would someone be kind
enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
of context / I'm overlooking
# Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] (06 Jul 2007)
# Masked for removal. bug #167379.
x11-themes/gdm-themes
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
I'll give a test
On Friday 06 July 2007, Steve Long wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
this would be for 2007.1+ profiles and we can leave the old things in
place until we phase out 2007.0 and older completely
This is actually something I was already planning on working on setting
up. To avoid conflicting
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06 Jul
2007 00:08:43 -0400:
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to the
4.2 tracker? I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely
On Friday 06 July 2007, Duncan wrote:
Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to the
4.2 tracker? I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2 related.
done, cheers
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented. It's enough that loads of games
kill non-interactivity.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1? Are there problems with the RC, or are
all important
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 03:09:23PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT=fetch? Would someone be kind
enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
of context / I'm
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
the same exact thing could be said for everything using `built_with_use`
It's enough that loads of games kill
Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
the same exact thing could be said for everything using `built_with_use`
This check in this
On Friday 06 July 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1?
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06 Jul
2007 11:13:30 -0400:
Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to
the 4.2 tracker? I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2
related.
done, cheers
Thanks. =8^)
--
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 07:40:47PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
the same exact thing could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A grep '!!' /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc reveals the following:
bootstrap - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, used during
original system bootstrapping [make stage2]
build - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!,
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) kirjoitti:
A grep '!!' /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc reveals the following:
bootstrap - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, used during
original system bootstrapping [make stage2]
build - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, used
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike
- From the topic of #emacs: glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use glibc2.5
On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
They'll already have installed the software, which requires acceptance
of the license.
No violation here: [...] IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS
AGREEMENT,
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
Then the software won't run, very easy.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key
On Friday 06 July 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
static - !!do not set this during bootstrap!! Causes binaries to be
statically linked instead of dynamically
i dont really think this is in the same category at all with the other flags
you mentioned here ... plus i'm not sure this is even
On Friday 06 July 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
From the topic of #emacs: glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Torsten Rehn wrote:
On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
They'll already have installed the software, which requires acceptance
of the license.
No violation
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
Will we see the hardened gcc-4 patchset included in this?
--atj
--
[EMAIL
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- From the topic of #emacs: glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use
glibc2.5 for now. Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't
been able to confirm with them.
We are old-school and don't hang around on IRC. We are very
responsive to bug reports
Luca Barbato wrote:
gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.
I've been using it on x86 and ppc32 (ibook g4) for a week or two with no
issues.
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Michał Januszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] (06 Jul 2007)
# Unsupported, use media-gfx/splashutils instead.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
media-gfx/bootsplash
We don't provide any kernels patched with bootsplash anymore and
media-gfx/bootsplash has no support for baselayout-2. media-gfx/splashutils
It's my pleasure to not introduce you to somebody you already knew for
the good reason he is already a Gentoo developer. He is the German
translator follow-up to be exact. However, Tobias obtained today a
shiny new license to break the tree as a full developer. He will
initially work for that
* José Luis Rivero (yoswink) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just rescued the xml we used the last year and update the current
nominations. The list is in:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~yoswink/council-2007.xml
It has been moved to:
I think we should have user space splash... As fbsplash does not work
with all video cards and last time I checked the whole framebuffer in
kernel is not actively maintained.
Alon.
On 7/7/07, Michal Januszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Michał Januszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] (06 Jul 2007)
#
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 01:06:07AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
I think we should have user space splash... As fbsplash does not work
splashutils is a _userspace_ splash. fbsplash isn't, but then it only
provides the verbose mode (background pictures on system consoles) and
there is no way of
On 7/7/07, Michal Januszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 01:06:07AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
I think we should have user space splash... As fbsplash does not work
splashutils is a _userspace_ splash. fbsplash isn't, but then it only
provides the verbose mode
Le vendredi 06 juillet 2007 à 23:52 +0200, Denis Dupeyron a écrit :
It's my pleasure to not introduce you to somebody you already knew for
the good reason he is already a Gentoo developer. He is the German
translator follow-up to be exact. However, Tobias obtained today a
shiny new license to
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06 Jul
2007 13:32:27 -0400:
i dont plan on gcc-4.2.0 ever hitting stable, just opening up the
testers so gcc-4.2.1 will be smooth
FWIW, I've only a single package not compiling on 4.2.0 now, and you
already
When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like adding
a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
hesitated.
I reviewed the bug reporting guidelines a month or so ago and didn't see
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
He will
initially work for that other desktop environment, also known as KDE.
So please, everybody, give a warm non-welcome to Tobias.
KDE? Boo!
How's that for a non-greeting? ;)
Just kidding. Congrats on completing your extra quizzes, Tobias!
signature.asc
On 7/7/07, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like adding
a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
hesitated.
I reviewed the bug reporting
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:34:39 + (UTC)
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like
adding a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
hesitated.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike
Now that the futimens patch is in coreutils, i heartily endorse this
event or product.
BTW, the GCC 4.2 porting tracker
Duncan wrote:
When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like adding
a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
hesitated.
I don't think anyone can be opposed to a thank you. Keep
On Friday 06 July 2007, Ryan Hill wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
Now that the futimens patch is in coreutils, i heartily endorse this
event or
070707 Duncan wrote:
When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed,
I often feel like adding a thanks to the bug.
However, while it may be polite in other circumstances,
in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've hesitated.
I'm wondering, what's the general opinion?
I try to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Torsten Rehn wrote:
On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
They'll already have installed the
the new util-linux package has merged the setarch binary. for the upgrade
path, i figure we do:
- drop sys-apps/setarch from profiles
- add sys-apps/setarch to util-linux-2.12 based on arch?()
- add !sys-apps/setarch to util-linux-2.13+
any input ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is
56 matches
Mail list logo
