# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (20 Jul 2007)
# Orphaned configuration files using devfsd.
# Masked for treecleaners. Removed in 60 days.
# Bug 64138.
app-cdr/cdrw-base
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hello Benedikt
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can be
reused by other qmail variants as well.
Okay, I looked through it and found some things which need
reconsideration. I agree that user creation
Eric Polino wrote:
If this is truly a problem, then I think the negative USE flags might
be the better solution then. This would allow users the ability to
disable potential insecure features. But really, I doubt security is
an issue here.
The negative (or no*) USE flags are generally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Marples wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 23:11 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Mike Doty wrote:
[snip]
get this shit off the dev list and somewhere more appropriate.
I have a question for in here. Now this is (rightly) going to -project,
are any
On 7/20/07, Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Polino wrote:
If this is truly a problem, then I think the negative USE flags might
be the better solution then. This would allow users the ability to
disable potential insecure features. But really, I doubt security is
an issue
Duncan wrote:
joshua jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:10:35 -0700:
Honestly..this is not something to get picky over jakub. Upstream was
nice and actually came and politely asked us to change the defaults to
what most people would
George Prowse schrieb:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:45:46 -0500
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Any user who will see and respond to a question is unrepresentative
of the user base in general.
So if ten users reply then, are all ten individually wrong
fire-eyes wrote:
Duncan wrote:
OTOH, if enabling those protocols pulls in all sorts of additional
packages to support them, shipping with everything on just because
it's possible is not the Gentoo way. That's what USE flags are
for. If indeed additional dependencies are pulled in, IMO
Thomas Scharl wrote:
George Prowse schrieb:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:45:46 -0500
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Any user who will see and respond to a question is unrepresentative
of the user base in general.
So if ten users reply then, are all ten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Kundrát wrote:
I'd also like to nominate mcummings (he's an old guy in Gentoo land and
his mails look reasonable), lack (he's a bit fresher, but his mails are
good) and kumba (old guy, nice mails).
XML has been updated.
Cheers,
-jkt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Blackace wrote:
I'd like to nominate:
vapier
tsunam
nightmorph
seemant
avenj
christel
Although most of them will probably decline, I think they would do an
excellent job straightening out Gentoo's heading and have the barnacles
to perform
It would seem there is a good support for a change to enable all
protocols by default. What will change this issue from a good thread
to an action on the package to implement these ideas?
Another suggestion brought to me by an upstream dev was that Pidgin is
configured to install all protocols
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:17:58 -0700:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:15:31PM -0500, lnxg33k wrote:
Ryan Hill wrote:
These are on gmane now as well. -dev-announce as RO and -project as
RW.
They should have turned up
Duncan wrote:
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:17:58 -0700:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:15:31PM -0500, lnxg33k wrote:
Ryan Hill wrote:
These are on gmane now as well. -dev-announce as RO and -project as
RW.
They should
Duncan wrote:
Is anybody subscribed by mail getting stuff on project yet? If neither
gmane or gentoo's archives are showing anything...
I've received two mails (I believe that's all) after subscribing sometime
wednesday.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 7/20/07, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:20:06 -0400
Eric Polino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would seem there is a good support for a change to enable all
protocols by default. What will change this issue from a good thread
to an action on the package to
Duncan wrote:
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:17:58 -0700:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:15:31PM -0500, lnxg33k wrote:
Ryan Hill wrote:
These are on gmane now as well. -dev-announce as RO and -project as
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:52:02 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Benedikt
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can
be reused by other qmail variants as well.
Okay, I looked
++
On 7/20/07, Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
It is an honest developer question because it was meant to have discussions
between
George Prowse [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:58:23 +0100:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
It's likely some subscriptions are caught in limbo. See my question on
the Getting
George Prowse wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
It is an honest developer question because it was meant to
George Prowse schrieb:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
sure
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
George Prowse wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
It is an honest developer question because it was meant to
Dale napsal(a):
George Prowse wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
It is an honest developer question because it
Dale wrote:
George Prowse wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
It is an honest developer question because it was
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
qmail_base_install should be split in smaller functions, maybe with
callbacks (if possible in bash).
There is now qmail_mini_install (called by every qmail ebuild) and
qmail_{full,man,sendmail}_install for the rest of a full
Dale wrote:
George Prowse wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
It is an honest developer question because it was
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 00:02 -0400, Eric Polino wrote:
Someone mentioned just killing the USE flags and making them all hard
dependencies, however. I really hope that's not done if additional
dependencies are involved.
I see your point, but how different would this be to any application
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 18:54 +0200, Thomas Scharl wrote:
Anyways this is more of philosophical/social issue to discuss about than
a technical one.
One thing that I had been considering bringing up and getting help with
is some scripts/whatever to get users to do things they might not know
they
On Fri, 2007-20-07 at 00:57 +0100, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Thu, 2007-19-07 at 15:22 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:02 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
I'm all for doing it now in the profile, but it's not my package.
Perhaps someone from the net-im herd can make this
On Fri, 2007-20-07 at 14:40 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Anyway, if nobody objects and nobody beats me to it, I'll add the USE
flags for the common protocols to package.use in the profiles. Now, the
real question is what should I enable?
All of the ones that have no major dependencies are
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:48:12 -0700
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, some things I think we could/should do are:
- GWN
- gentoo-announce
- gentoo-stats (or whatever we have now, if anything)
Smolt, which is Fedora's new hardware-profiling program, is actively
porting to other
On Friday, 20. July 2007 23:48, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 18:54 +0200, Thomas Scharl wrote:
Anyways this is more of philosophical/social issue to discuss about
than a technical one.
One thing that I had been considering bringing up and getting help
with is some
Chris Gianelloni schrieb:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 18:54 +0200, Thomas Scharl wrote:
Anyways this is more of philosophical/social issue to discuss about than
a technical one.
One thing that I had been considering bringing up and getting help with
is some scripts/whatever to get users to do
OK. I'm sure this will probably bring upon a ton of responses, but
let's hope they all stay on-topic. I'm not posting this to
gentoo-project since I think it belongs here until this is agreed upon.
So, let's get started:
gentoo-dev: This list is for technical discussion, primarily between
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 22:57 +0100, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Fri, 2007-20-07 at 14:40 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Anyway, if nobody objects and nobody beats me to it, I'll add the USE
flags for the common protocols to package.use in the profiles. Now, the
real question is what should I
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:56 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:48:12 -0700
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, some things I think we could/should do are:
- GWN
- gentoo-announce
- gentoo-stats (or whatever we have now, if anything)
Smolt, which is
On 7/20/07, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gentoo-projects: This list is for... what exactly? I've not really
figured that one out just yet. I know it is supposed to be pretty much
anything that doesn't fit into gentoo-dev or another project-specific
list. Am I correct here? Is
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:20:24 -0700
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gentoo-dev-announce: This is the announcement list for
development-related stuff. Now, there's two ideas for how to run the
list, that I can think of, but I'm sure there's others.
- Make the list set reply-to to
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:29:10 -0700
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could have sworn genone was working on something stats-related.
He was. I asked him about it a while ago and that's where I got the
hiatus bit.
00:30 @dberkholz genone__: anything ever happen with the stats app?
Nathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:53:02 -0700:
On 7/20/07, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gentoo-projects: This list is for... what exactly? I've not really
figured that one out just yet. I know it is supposed to be
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri,
20 Jul 2007 15:20:24 -0700:
gentoo-dev: This list is for technical discussion, primarily between
developers, about development and development-related issues that
directly affect the tree or current
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
gentoo-projects: This list is for... what exactly? I've not really
figured that one out just yet. I know it is supposed to be pretty much
anything that doesn't fit into gentoo-dev or another project-specific
list. Am I correct here? Is this what everyone thinks this
Jakub Moc wrote:
_ _ _ _ _
| | | |/ ___| | | | |
| | | | | _| |_| | |
| |_| | |_| | _ |_|
\___/ \|_| |_(_)
Stop flooding my mailbox as well with this irrelevant junk finally, it's
totally off-topic here; if you want to complain that noone loves you,
then go to your nanny,
47 matches
Mail list logo
