As suggested by ssuominen on bug #311101, I am posting the issue
to the mailing list.
Currently, various SCM eclasses differ very much in the subset
of features and control variables implemented. The idea is to establish
a single subset of such variables and rules for all SCM eclasses
to follow,
2010-03-23 20:28:38 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
On 23 March 2010 20:13, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm attaching updated news item, which will be committed soon.
As mentioned in the other thread, this news item should mention
that users who do not need
On 24 March 2010 17:43, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-23 20:28:38 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
On 23 March 2010 20:13, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm attaching updated news item, which will be committed soon.
As
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:43:56 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-23 20:28:38 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
As mentioned in the other thread, this news item should mention
that users who do not need python-3 should mask it locally to
prevent it from being
Michał Górny posted on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:28:38 +0100 as excerpted:
As suggested by ssuominen on bug #311101, I am posting the issue to the
mailing list.
Currently, various SCM eclasses differ very much in the subset of
features and control variables implemented. The idea is to establish a
2010-03-24 17:57:35 Joshua Saddler napisał(a):
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:43:56 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-23 20:28:38 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
As mentioned in the other thread, this news item should mention
that users who do not need
2010-03-24 17:56:48 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
On 24 March 2010 17:43, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-23 20:28:38 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
On 23 March 2010 20:13, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm attaching updated
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:14:44 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-24 17:57:35 Joshua Saddler napisał(a):
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:43:56 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
Python maintainers do not recommend to mask
On 24 March 2010 18:23, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-24 17:56:48 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
On 24 March 2010 17:43, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-23 20:28:38 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
On 23 March 2010 20:13,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:14:44 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-24 17:57:35 Joshua Saddler napisał(a):
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:43:56 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 24 March 2010 18:23, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-24 17:56:48 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
On 24 March 2010 17:43, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:35:21 +0100
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll take that as a yes then, you are indeed disregarding the concerns
and recommendations of your fellow Gentoo developers.
CC'ing devrel because this is getting out of hand.
Looks like an extremely productive
2010-03-24 18:32:37 Joshua Saddler napisał(a):
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:14:44 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-24 17:57:35 Joshua Saddler napisał(a):
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:43:56 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:32:37 -0700, Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
But everyone else in Gentoo does, so . . .
Some Gentoo developers/users, who aren't Python maintainers, said that
they didn't object to have Python 3 installed.
They're in the minority, judging by the replies
On 3/24/10 6:35 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
All valid concerns about text already included in the news item have been
addressed. We don't need to include any unofficial recommendations.
I'll take that as a yes then, you are indeed disregarding the concerns
and recommendations of your fellow
Am 24.03.2010 18:45, schrieb Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis:
2010-03-24 18:32:37 Joshua Saddler napisał(a):
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:14:44 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
Some Gentoo developers/users, who aren't Python maintainers, said that
they
2010-03-23 20:57:33 Jonathan Callen napisał(a):
On 03/23/2010 03:13 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
I'm attaching updated news item, which will be committed soon.
A couple grammar issues:
-modules, which support both Python 2 and Python 3, are installed for both
-active
2010-03-24 18:51:48 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napisał(a):
On 3/24/10 6:35 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
All valid concerns about text already included in the news item have been
addressed. We don't need to include any unofficial recommendations.
I'll take that as a yes then, you are indeed
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 05:47:18PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:32:37 -0700, Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
But everyone else in Gentoo does, so . . .
Really? I've seen a few people object, but not everyone in gentoo.
Some Gentoo developers/users,
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:04:51 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
People, don't want Python 3, probably have already masked it. There is
no reason to waste Council's time for decision on what sentence should
be included in the news item.
Not the folks running
I took a look at qemu-kvm and found something I percieve as funny:
It had a gnutls use-flag, but no ssl useflag.
As I see it is I want ssl/tls support it should be sufficient to enable
USE=ssl and let the maintainer of said ebuild decide which
implementation (if more then one) I am better off
On 03/24/2010 02:28 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:04:51 +0100 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesisarfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
People, don't want Python 3, probably have already masked it. There
is no reason to waste Council's time for decision on what sentence
should be
On 24 March 2010 19:41, Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/24/2010 02:28 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:04:51 +0100 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesisarfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
People, don't want Python 3, probably have already masked it. There
is no reason to
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:41:28PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
On 03/24/2010 02:28 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:04:51 +0100 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesisarfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
People, don't want Python 3, probably have already masked it. There
is no reason
William Hubbs posted on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:03:34 -0500 as excerpted:
If users do not want python-3 on
their systems, that is what /etc/portage/package.mask is for.
I think pretty much everyone agrees with that. What we're debating is
whether the stabling news item should specifically
Am 24.03.2010 19:03, schrieb William Hubbs:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 05:47:18PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:32:37 -0700, Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
But everyone else in Gentoo does, so . . .
Really? I've seen a few people object, but not everyone in
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 08:57:20PM +0100, Thomas Sachau wrote:
Am 24.03.2010 19:03, schrieb William Hubbs:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 05:47:18PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:32:37 -0700, Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
But everyone else in Gentoo does, so .
On 24 March 2010 21:25, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we make it clear in the news item that python-3 cannot be used as the
default python, so if users do not want it they should mask it, we have
done our job imho. In other words, this is just a matter of informing
users.
We
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:36:52PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 24 March 2010 21:25, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we make it clear in the news item that python-3 cannot be used as the
default python, so if users do not want it they should mask it, we have
done our job imho.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:36:52PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 24 March 2010 21:25, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we make it clear in the news item that python-3 cannot be used as the
default python, so if users do not want it they should mask it, we have
done our job imho.
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:12:55 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:36:52PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
We agree that this is the minimum that should be done. But our
Python lead stubbornly refuses to honor this reasonable request.
On the other hand, I
Hi,
As the subject says, the portage sources have been moved from SVN to
GIT [1]. The new repo is located on git.overlays.gentoo.org [2].
I've just updated the documentation to reflect this move [3] and it
will be a few minutes before the html regenerates.
If you have push access then you can
On 03/24/10 09:07, Zac Medico wrote:
If you have push access then you can commit something to the master
branch like this:
git clone git+ssh://g...@git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git
cd portage
# edit files
git commit -a
git push origin master
Let me add a few more words
33 matches
Mail list logo
