Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Markos Chandras
On 16 January 2013 04:20, Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote: 16.01.2013 03:36, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Hi, several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 - 13.0 transition would be a good moment to finally remove the (also in my opinion rather useless) server profiles. The

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Rich Freeman wrote: Not that anybody is taking requests, but it would be really handy if serial ports were deterministically labeled. Does /dev/serial/* solve the problem? I don't see this directory at all on my system.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium system ffmpeg

2013-01-16 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:12 -0800 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: On 1/15/13 4:55 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:34:42 -0800 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm trying to make Chromium be more compatible with more versions of ffmpeg:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium system ffmpeg

2013-01-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:12 -0800 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: What when chromium upstream uses code more recent than latest ffmpeg release and it doesn't compile against latest release? Blame

Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium system ffmpeg

2013-01-16 Thread Luca Barbato
On 15/01/13 05:34, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: I'm trying to make Chromium be more compatible with more versions of ffmpeg: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/topic/chromium-dev/fm5Oe_AC3Sc/discussion (although not stated there, that includes libav). Now the initial response there is

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: linux-info.eclass

2013-01-16 Thread Markos Chandras
On 14 January 2013 21:19, Mike Frysinger (vapier) vap...@gentoo.org wrote: - local RESULT - local config + localRESULT config There is a typo^^^ here leading to errors like this * QA Notice: command not found: * * /usr/portage/eclass/linux-info.eclass: line 326:

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Panagiotis Christopoulos
On 00:36 Wed 16 Jan , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 - 13.0 transition would be a good moment to finally remove the (also in my opinion rather useless) server profiles. The server profiles are not useless, if we can maintain them, and if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium system ffmpeg

2013-01-16 Thread Luca Barbato
On 16/01/13 12:54, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:12 -0800 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: On 1/15/13 4:55 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:34:42 -0800 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm trying to make Chromium be more

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-16 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/12/2013 05:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the same time I also received lots of

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/12/2013 11:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. cool I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the same time I also received lots of

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Mol
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Panagiotis Christopoulos pchr...@gentoo.org wrote: On 00:36 Wed 16 Jan , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 - 13.0 transition would be a good moment to finally remove the (also in my opinion rather useless) server

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/16/2013 08:32 AM, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote: On 00:36 Wed 16 Jan , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 - 13.0 transition would be a good moment to finally remove the (also in my opinion

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 16/01/13 08:32 AM, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote: On 00:36 Wed 16 Jan , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 - 13.0 transition would be a good moment to finally remove the (also in my opinion

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-16 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Greg KH wrote: So anyone who relies on network names right now to be deterministic, and you have more than one network device in your system, should seriously reconsider how they are naming their devices, as it will not work if you only rely on the kernel. You

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-16 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi! On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Greg KH wrote: So anyone who relies on network names right now to be deterministic, and you have more than one network device in your system, should seriously reconsider how they are naming

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Weber
On 01/15/2013 09:51 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: emerge --sync layman -S eix-sync #layman... porticron # from porticron update-gentoo # cvs setup https://xmw.de/dotfiles/bin/update-gentoo emerge --upgrade with a

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-16 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 16/01/2013 17:25, Mike Gilbert ha scritto: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi! On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Greg KH wrote: So anyone who relies on network names right now to be deterministic, and you have more than one network device in your system,

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Weber
On 01/16/2013 05:25 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: It has been rather nifty that if I walk up to a random machine with exactly one NIC (that I've been asked to examine/fix), I _know_ that there will be eth0 and only that. ++ I would actually like to see iproute2 added to the system set. ++ --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium system ffmpeg

2013-01-16 Thread Alec Warner
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:12 -0800 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: What when chromium upstream uses code more recent than latest

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/16/2013 11:36 AM, Michael Weber wrote: emerge --upgrade with a predefined EMERGE_UPGRADE_OPTS in make.conf (where EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS lives). +1 so I can stop adding --oneshot onto every upgrade.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium system ffmpeg

2013-01-16 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 1/16/13 8:40 AM, Alec Warner wrote: Google generally prefers agility. Particularly when machines have gobs of memory (so bundling is not as big of a deal as it was previously) and they can staff security fixes for all their bundled libs. This is quite a pervasive attitude there. Coming from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/16/2013 11:47 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 01/16/2013 11:36 AM, Michael Weber wrote: emerge --upgrade with a predefined EMERGE_UPGRADE_OPTS in make.conf (where EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS lives). +1 so I can stop adding --oneshot onto every upgrade. Oh, damn, this isn't suggesting what I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes

2013-01-16 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 16/01/13 11:49 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 01/16/2013 11:47 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 01/16/2013 11:36 AM, Michael Weber wrote: emerge --upgrade with a predefined EMERGE_UPGRADE_OPTS in make.conf (where EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS lives).

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes

2013-01-16 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 16/01/13 11:47 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 01/16/2013 11:36 AM, Michael Weber wrote: emerge --upgrade with a predefined EMERGE_UPGRADE_OPTS in make.conf (where EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS lives). +1 so I can stop adding --oneshot onto every

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Alexis Ballier
Other option: kill the server subprofiles, keep profiles/target/server and let people finally set /etc/make.profile as a dir and play with multiple inheritance. We don't need dozens of subprofiles with only eapi and parent files in them... A.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/16/2013 12:24 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 16/01/13 11:47 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 01/16/2013 11:36 AM, Michael Weber wrote: emerge --upgrade with a predefined EMERGE_UPGRADE_OPTS in make.conf (where EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS lives).

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/16/2013 12:24 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: --upgrade wouldn't (couldn't, imo) replace --update. Yes, sorry for the confusion. I use more than one package manager, and when doing an update or upgrade I'm basically flipping a coin. I just

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-16 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: net-wireless/b43-fwcutter-017 be my guest, although I prefer the bugs personally. That's what he's doing... asking maintainers if it's okay to open stabilization bugs for their packages.

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Ben de Groot
On 16 January 2013 22:16, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: We have a base profile, we have a desktop profile... wouldn't that make the base the minimal profile that would likely be fit for a server? If not, we really should move that way. Having a base, desktop, and server

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-emulation/qemu-user mask

2013-01-16 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Alexey Shvetsov ale...@gentoo.org wrote: В письме от 14 января 2013 00:38:06 пользователь Doug Goldstein написал: On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Alexey Shvetsov ale...@gentoo.org wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 16/01/13 08:32 AM, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote: On 00:36 Wed 16 Jan , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 - 13.0

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-emulation/qemu-user mask

2013-01-16 Thread Luca Barbato
On 12/01/13 05:45, Doug Goldstein wrote: Just wanted to give everyone a heads up. app-emulation/qemu provides all the functionality of app-emulation/qemu-user without all the outstanding security bugs and issues the package has. For users using a cross chroot, I encourage you to look at

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Matthew Thode
On 01/16/2013 01:18 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: On 16/01/13 08:32 AM, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote: On 00:36 Wed 16 Jan , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 - 13.0

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: 2 - the only difference between server profiles and the base profile is USE=+snmp and maybe one other flag USE=-perl -python snmp truetype xml As

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-16 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:40:02 + (UTC) Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) scarab...@gentoo.org wrote: scarabeus13/01/16 12:40:02 Modified: ChangeLog Added:ffmpeg-9.ebuild Removed: ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild Log: Add new virtual for 1.1/9

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/16/2013 08:12 AM, Michael Mol wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Panagiotis Christopoulos pchr...@gentoo.org wrote: On 00:36 Wed 16 Jan , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 - 13.0

Re: Debian patching KDE to use /etc for configuration (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: call for testers: udev predictable network interface names)

2013-01-16 Thread Kevin Chadwick
I never meant it is rubbish as such but I saw it as rediculously inferior to sudo before I even read this. http://drfav.wordpress.com/2012/05/11/the-quest-towards-trusted-client-applications-a-rambling/ Perhaps I'm misunderstanding, but that is talking about a specific set of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-16 Thread Luca Barbato
On 16/01/13 21:09, Alexis Ballier wrote: More seriously: Why ? Who decided this ? I never pushed my weight over it before since as you are involved in FFmpeg directly, I am involved in Libav directly. Thus anything I say on this topic has a clear bias. Same goes for you. Tomas is not related

[gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild bikeshedding

2013-01-16 Thread Paul Varner
All: Time for some bikeshedding :) For the gentoolkit-0.3.0 series, I removed any filtering of emerge options set in EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPS for revdep-rebuild. This has caused some people to complain because some of the flags in their EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS are not suitable for a revdep-rebuild run.

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild bikeshedding

2013-01-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Paul Varner fuzzy...@gentoo.org wrote: 2. What behavior do we want? append to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS or replace EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS Replace is probably better. You can always manually append if you want to, but it is much harder to remove unless portage has logic

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: As has been pointed out previously, the base profile does not set USE=perl python, so negating those flags in the server profile does basically nothing. If certain packages have IUSE=+perl +python it might make a

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild bikeshedding

2013-01-16 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 16/01/13 03:43 PM, Paul Varner wrote: All: Time for some bikeshedding :) For the gentoolkit-0.3.0 series, I removed any filtering of emerge options set in EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPS for revdep-rebuild. This has caused some people to complain

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013, 00:36:18 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: Hi, several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 - 13.0 transition would be a good moment to finally remove the (also in my opinion rather useless) server profiles. OK, I consider this consensus enough. [One nay

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-16 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:39:04 +0100 Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 16/01/13 21:09, Alexis Ballier wrote: More seriously: Why ? Who decided this ? I never pushed my weight over it before since as you are involved in FFmpeg directly, I am involved in Libav directly. I don't know

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild bikeshedding

2013-01-16 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013, at 03:57 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: [...] +1 on the replace. +1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-16 Thread Luca Barbato
On 16/01/13 22:31, Alexis Ballier wrote: interesting, did they report it? OTOH, they switched _after_ the 2.0.5 release which happens to be the latest one. Since vlc is probably the ffmpeg/libav interface the most popular in the world (due to their windows and mac builds), I'd like to see an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-16 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:52:52 +0100 Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 16/01/13 22:31, Alexis Ballier wrote: interesting, did they report it? OTOH, they switched _after_ the 2.0.5 release which happens to be the latest one. Since vlc is probably the ffmpeg/libav interface the most

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Panagiotis Christopoulos
On 22:14 Wed 16 Jan , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013, 00:36:18 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: OK, I consider this consensus enough. ... Being the one that does the work, the server profiles are disappearing in 13.0. Err, ok, so now guys, we 're offering a

How a proper server profile should look like (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...)

2013-01-16 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
I think we agree that the last state of the server profiles was not useful. So let's discuss what would be useful. For the medium-term future, not for this current step now. Err, ok, so now guys, we 're offering a base profile* with dri, cups, gmp, fortran and pppd(?) enabled, at the same

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/16/2013 06:33 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Yes, sorry for the confusion. I use more than one package manager, and when doing an update or upgrade I'm basically flipping a coin. hehe, as long as we don't --dist-upgrade ;-) the g was

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-16 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/16/2013 01:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote: honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-16 Thread Matt Turner
honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random emails that I have to search through. So ignore it and he'll open bugs just the

Re: How a proper server profile should look like (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...)

2013-01-16 Thread Walter Dnes
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:59:11AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote Sure a server is something generic, too. However, since you mentioned mysql above, how about a postgres server? Or a web server using a daemon different from apache? :) This is why I think (as others) a server profile

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-16 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:36:59AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Rich Freeman wrote: Not that anybody is taking requests, but it would be really handy if serial ports were deterministically labeled. Does /dev/serial/*

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Greg KH gre...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:36:59AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Rich Freeman wrote: Not that anybody is taking requests, but it would be really handy if

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Panagiotis Christopoulos pchr...@gentoo.org wrote: Err, ok, so now guys, we 're offering a base profile* with dri, cups, gmp, fortran and pppd(?) enabled, at the same time openmp enabled but threads disabled, no sockets, no caps no apache2 or mysql that I would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes

2013-01-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: how does portage @preserved-libs work? maybe we could emerge @update[s] and @glsa. @glsa actually makes a lot of sense. I'm not convinced we want @updates as a shortcut for a bunch of settings though. Sets are just about

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-16 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 16/01/13 22:09, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:40:02 + (UTC) Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) scarab...@gentoo.org wrote: scarabeus13/01/16 12:40:02 Modified: ChangeLog Added:ffmpeg-9.ebuild Removed: ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

Re: Debian patching KDE to use /etc for configuration (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: call for testers: udev predictable network interface names)

2013-01-16 Thread Alec Warner
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: I never meant it is rubbish as such but I saw it as rediculously inferior to sudo before I even read this. http://drfav.wordpress.com/2012/05/11/the-quest-towards-trusted-client-applications-a-rambling/