-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Marples wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 23:11 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Mike Doty wrote:
[snip]
get this shit off the dev list and somewhere more appropriate.
I have a question for in here. Now this is (rightly) going to -project,
are any
George Prowse schrieb:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:45:46 -0500
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Any user who will see and respond to a question is unrepresentative
of the user base in general.
So if ten users reply then, are all ten individually wrong
Thomas Scharl wrote:
George Prowse schrieb:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:45:46 -0500
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Any user who will see and respond to a question is unrepresentative
of the user base in general.
So if ten users reply then, are all ten
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 18:54 +0200, Thomas Scharl wrote:
Anyways this is more of philosophical/social issue to discuss about than
a technical one.
One thing that I had been considering bringing up and getting help with
is some scripts/whatever to get users to do things they might not know
they
On Friday, 20. July 2007 23:48, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 18:54 +0200, Thomas Scharl wrote:
Anyways this is more of philosophical/social issue to discuss about
than a technical one.
One thing that I had been considering bringing up and getting help
with is some
Chris Gianelloni schrieb:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 18:54 +0200, Thomas Scharl wrote:
Anyways this is more of philosophical/social issue to discuss about than
a technical one.
One thing that I had been considering bringing up and getting help with
is some scripts/whatever to get users to do
Steve Long wrote:
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Perhaps we also need to make it more clear where users can ask such
Gentoo-specific questions about specific packages, so they don't need to
go and annoy upstream. Associate an irc-channel with each package. Most
packages have a herd associated
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:02:46 +0100
George Prowse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to know how to get a better relationship with users...
ask them!
Any user who will see and respond to a question is unrepresentative
of the user base in general.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:36:34 +0100
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Perhaps we also need to make it more clear where users can ask such
Gentoo-specific questions about specific packages, so they don't
need to go and annoy upstream.
In #gentoo we
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:02:46 +0100
George Prowse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to know how to get a better relationship with users...
ask them!
Any user who will see and respond to a question is unrepresentative
of the user base in general.
that is why the
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:45:46 -0500
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Any user who will see and respond to a question is unrepresentative
of the user base in general.
So if ten users reply then, are all ten individually wrong too?
Not my point. My point is that most
On Thursday, 19. July 2007 22:39, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Associate an irc-channel with each package.
Associate how? Sounds like a lot of work at the least and a lot of
cruft at the worst.
It could be included in the herds.xml:
herd
namekde/name
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:59 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The set of people who respond is
heavily skewed towards better-informed users who have time to seek out
and participate in that kind of questioning.
Fair point, but the more better-informed users we have, the better it is
for everyone
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:45:46 -0500
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Any user who will see and respond to a question is unrepresentative
of the user base in general.
So if ten users reply then, are all ten individually wrong too?
Not my point. My
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:22:19 +0100
George Prowse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not my point. My point is that most Gentoo users would either not
see the question or not respond. Those that both see the question
and take time to respond are highly atypical.
If you were clever enough and wanted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
snip everything
not technical, take it to -project.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGn9rz1c+EtXTHkJcRAqEiAJ91+dcEu2/q6F1K/QTkqaHgWJUl0QCeMh6u
George Prowse wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:45:46 -0500
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Any user who will see and respond to a question is unrepresentative
of the user base in general.
So if ten users reply then, are all ten individually wrong
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:22:19 +0100
George Prowse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not my point. My point is that most Gentoo users would either not
see the question or not respond. Those that both see the question
and take time to respond are highly atypical.
If you were clever
[snip]
get this shit off the dev list and somewhere more appropriate.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Mike Doty wrote:
[snip]
get this shit off the dev list and somewhere more appropriate.
I have a question for in here. Now this is (rightly) going to -project,
are any devs actually going to comment on the discussion?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:51 -0500, Dale wrote:
Now the new deal is meeting the same resistance just like the proctors
and I suspect it will fail too. Gentoo needs to listen to the people.
No.
Gentoo needs to make intelligent decisions, whether it comes from a
single individual or an army
Eric Polino wrote:
Not sure if this fits in to what you're talking about, but I do know
that as myself a would like to me maintainer someday, I'm somewhat
lost as to knowing how I can get involved and who I need to talk to.
Your best starting point is #gentoo-dev-help (if you need to talk a
22 matches
Mail list logo
