[gentoo-dev] test, please ignore

2017-07-17 Thread Nicolas Bock
-- Nicolas Bock signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] test, please ignore

2017-07-17 Thread Nicolas Bock
-- Nicolas Bock signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] test -- ignore this

2016-11-27 Thread William Hubbs
signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Test email

2013-10-27 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Testing the lack of email on the lists for days. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85

Re: [gentoo-dev] Test email

2013-10-27 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 06:09:40AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Testing the lack of email on the lists for days. Ok, nothing wrong, just nobody actually sent an email Oct 23 10:56 UTC till this email (Oct 27 06:09 UTC). -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee Infrastructure

[gentoo-dev] Test request: open-iscsi 2.0.872

2011-06-05 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! Would be great to have a few people test open-iscsi 2.0.872 before moving it from overlay betagarden to the main tree. To get it installed please run: # layman -a betagarden # emerge -av =sys-block/open-iscsi-2.0.872 Important: Please include a description of what you did while

Re: [gentoo-dev] Test request: open-iscsi 2.0.872

2011-06-05 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2011.06.05 12:54, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Hello! Would be great to have a few people test open-iscsi 2.0.872 before moving it from overlay betagarden to the main tree. To get it installed please run: # layman -a betagarden # emerge -av =sys-block/open-iscsi-2.0.872 [snip]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Test request: open-iscsi 2.0.872

2011-06-05 Thread Stefan Behte
Hi, Would be great to have a few people test open-iscsi 2.0.872 before moving it from overlay betagarden to the main tree. [...] In the good old days, stuff like this would just be added to the tree either hard masked or not keyworded, or both. Why not still do that? +1 I had tested

[gentoo-dev] [Test request] Group plugdev for udisks and upower

2011-06-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
Mailed a while back about restoring the plugdev group behavior like HAL had for their udev replacements upower and udisks, so finally got something real to be tested: http://bugs.gentoo.org/369667 Just comment on the bug instead of ML Thanks, Samuli

Re: [gentoo-dev] Test request: Bugzilla load balancer

2009-08-21 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Robin H. Johnsonrobb...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi folks, I've been doing some more mucking with the Bugzilla code and setup, and I think I've got most of the issues worked out that previously prevented it from being fully load balanced. So, please test at:

[gentoo-dev] Test request: Bugzilla load balancer

2009-07-29 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Hi folks, I've been doing some more mucking with the Bugzilla code and setup, and I think I've got most of the issues worked out that previously prevented it from being fully load balanced. So, please test at: http://bugs-web-lb.gentoo.org/ HTTP and HTTPS available. Thanks to ra...@hyves for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Test request: Bugzilla load balancer

2009-07-29 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Robin H. Johnson wrote: So, please test at: http://bugs-web-lb.gentoo.org/ HTTP and HTTPS available. Nice, makes a very responsive impression to me. Sebastian

[gentoo-dev] test

2007-03-01 Thread Thibaut Fernagut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 please ignore -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF5zr/R6N46HXxiJERAuxMAKC8mIzInQr5FxEsUpFOXUpUAsl7MACg1rCD RHlpGDlfMBicuIsvzPokXEY= =wUsp -END PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

2007-03-01 Thread expose
please ignore if you wanted to test wether you successfully registered you could also have waited 12 hours, that is, you could have waited for as long as you would expect it to take unitl the next mail is sent to this list, which is unlikely to be longer than 12hrs. cheers, daniel --

[gentoo-dev] Test

2006-11-01 Thread Luis Francisco Araujo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Test .. ignore - -- Luis F. Araujo araujo at gentoo.org Gentoo Linux -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFSSYTaTNpke9pJcURAgjUAJ4vqegitzaO6Kk5b9Zwm53WwTcm6ACfX/fz EoLOlEtCHk0RkUSEaG5lfIY= =aw+F -END PGP

[gentoo-dev] test request - gnutls-1.4.1 and libtasn1-0.3.4

2006-08-02 Thread Daniel Black
I've added new versions of these libs to gentoo. They are currently in package.mask because I've missed a few bumps versions in between and there is an ABI change. Some old deprecated functions have been removed. So far these have been working for me fine however I'd appreciate your assistance

Re: [gentoo-dev] Test request: linux-mod support for arches with 64-bit kernel/32-bit userland

2006-07-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 03:08 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: It would be nice to have this in 2006.1 (I suspect catalyst/genkernel could probably benefit greatly from it). We've already made the snapshot. Also, catalyst uses genkernel for all of the external modules builds, and we've already got

[gentoo-dev] Test request: linux-mod support for arches with 64-bit kernel/32-bit userland

2006-07-04 Thread Robin H. Johnson
This is a testing request aimed at all arches that have differing kernel/userspace bit counts. My short list so far is: - ppc64 - 64/32 (tested myself, but more testing needed) - sparc64 - 64/32 - mips64 - 64/32 [1] Other possibles (they should be theoretically capable of it, but the profile is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Test request: linux-mod support for arches with 64-bit kernel/32-bit userland

2006-07-04 Thread Kumba
Robin H. Johnson wrote: Notes. 1. Mips: with your triple ABI stuff, you might want to look very closely at this. The triple ABI stuff doesn't really affect things. o32 userland on a 64bit box is the only case where you have to worry about split compilers. In a theoretical n32 or n64

Re: [gentoo-dev] Test request: linux-mod support for arches with 64-bit kernel/32-bit userland

2006-07-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 06:08, Robin H. Johnson wrote: - superh - 64/32 i wouldnt ever worry about this since, afaik, the sh64 port is still really developmental and no one really has hardware for end users to worry about ... plus they werent really designed to be compatible -mike

[gentoo-dev] [test/suggestion request] MySQL rc scripts

2005-11-18 Thread Francesco R.
--- ChangeLog extract 19 Nov 2005; Francesco Riosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] +files/mysql-slot.conf.d, +files/mysql-slot.rc6: These two are born for slotted MySQL, however they work as is on normal MySQL installations too. (require my_print_defaults) Features added or changed - Not using mysqld_safe

[gentoo-dev] test

2005-10-03 Thread Benjamin Allen
-- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Test message. Please ignore.

2005-09-04 Thread Sergey Kuleshov
sorry, this is just test, please ignore. -- Sergey Kuleshov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://svyatogor.gnns.net Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 158439855 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] test, please ignore

2005-05-25 Thread Dan Armak
Have been having trouble with the mailing lists... -- Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 pgpKwfWYVHHcs.pgp Description: PGP signature