Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-15 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Sebastian Pipping wrote: Robert Buchholz wrote: 1. has no DTD/xml validation schema I'd like to be part of the schema creation process [..] First try on a DTD and Relax NG schema for Layman's current overlays.xml format (used in layman-global.txt) over here:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-13 Thread Zhang Le
On 15:53 Sun 12 Jul , Sebastian Pipping wrote: The output produces line like MISMATCH gentoo-china (layman-global) versus china (repo_name) I have just changed gentoo-china overlay's repo_name to gentoo-china. -- Zhang, Le Gentoo/Loongson Developer http://zhangle.is-a-geek.org 0260

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-13 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On Sonntag, 12. Juli 2009, Sebastian Pipping wrote: vdr-xine-overlay, # vdr-xine Fixed to be vdr-xine. Zzam

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Fabian Groffen wrote: So alternative, what if we extend the layman-global.txt (which is xml in reality...) file with an extra property per overlay which holds the contents of it's repo_name? Good idea. I'll try to create a map for all overlays in layman-global.txt as a next step. Layman and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Sebastian Pipping wrote: I'll try to create a map for all overlays in layman-global.txt as a next step. Layman and shell tools should help with that. Believe it or not: discs space issues disallow me to have an answer already. The code is there, I just cannot checkout all overlays at the same

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Sunday 12 July 2009, Fabian Groffen wrote: since I assume you can't reliably use the checked out version of the overlay (by e.g. layman), can you try to retrieve the repo_name file from the overlay? Probably a lot of efforts. So alternative, what if we extend the layman-global.txt (which

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Robert Buchholz wrote: 1. has no DTD/xml validation schema I'd like to be part of the schema creation process but feel that having pre-mature schema's on the list and it's archives is not a good idea. If we had a schema file: where would we store it? Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Sunday 12 July 2009, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Robert Buchholz wrote: 1. has no DTD/xml validation schema I'd like to be part of the schema creation process but feel that having pre-mature schema's on the list and it's archives is not a good idea. It's probably wise not to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Sebastian Pipping
So here's the current result of my analysis: == Format: repo_name, # layman-global.txt Entries: maekke's overlay, # maekke kde, # kde-testing ERROR: Overlay lordvan lacks repo_name entry ERROR: Overlay rox lacks