[gentoo-user] Compile Problems

2003-09-18 Thread Fred Clausen
Hey all - I am having a couple of issues with things that I am trying to compile and I am at a wits end trying to figure out what to do. All of these issues revolve around nmemonics. If I try to compile any 2.4.xx kernel, I get an error, in random places, about an invalid nmemonic ';'.

Re: [gentoo-user] Compile Problems

2003-09-18 Thread Mark Knecht
Which version of gcc, glibc, etc are you running? emerge info is a good place to get everything quickly. - Mark On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 19:35, Fred Clausen wrote: Hey all - I am having a couple of issues with things that I am trying to compile and I am at a wits end trying to figure out

Re: [gentoo-user] Compile Problems

2003-09-18 Thread Fred Clausen
Mark Knecht wrote: Which version of gcc, glibc, etc are you running? emerge info is a good place to get everything quickly. - Mark On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 19:35, Fred Clausen wrote: Hey all - I am having a couple of issues with things that I am trying to compile and I am at a wits end

[gentoo-user] mlDonkey - new install - questions bugs?

2003-09-18 Thread Stroller
Hello, all, I've recently emerge'd mlDonkey, and very pleased with it I am, too. I have shared the /home/p2p/.mldonkey/incoming folder by Samba, so I can collect completed files over the LAN, but this has raised a couple of questions: - How do I change the umask that mlDonkey writes files

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout merge failed?

2003-09-18 Thread Steven Elling
On Thursday 18 September 2003 10:25, Andreas Vinsander wrote: Hi! When mergeing baselayout I got the following problem: The ebuild tries to copy a '.keep' file to my /home filesys. The thing is that I automount each user directory (/home/someuser) from my server, which means that /home is

[gentoo-user] DEBUGBUILD behavior changed?

2003-09-18 Thread Carl Hudkins
Hi... I've noticed with several packages (most recently, kdenetwork), that setting DEBUGBUILD=true before the emerge still results in stripped binaries. It's still shown in make.globals as the way to get un-stripped builds, but most of the time it seems not to work. Should all

Re: [gentoo-user] Compile Problems

2003-09-18 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 20:11, Fred Clausen wrote: Hey all - I am having a couple of issues with things that I am trying to compile and I am at a wits end trying to figure out what to do. All of these issues revolve around nmemonics. If I try to compile any 2.4.xx kernel, I get an

Re: [gentoo-user] problem with new kernel

2003-09-18 Thread Ernie Schroder
On Thursday 18 September 2003 06:10 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: On Friday 19 September 2003 06:57, Ernie Schroder wrote: On Thursday 18 September 2003 01:21 pm, Ernie Schroder wrote: I just compiled gentoo sources 2.4.20-r7. First time through the compile failed. pretty cryptic messages

Re: [gentoo-user] Compile Problems

2003-09-18 Thread Fred Clausen
I doubt this matters, but emerge info at the top says 2.4.20-gentoo-r6 while you are working on the gaming kernel. That's a bit strange, but probably not a problem. I had trouble with the gcc3.3 stuff. One of the main problems was it gets more strict about bits of code. I turned in two that made

[gentoo-user] Re: mlDonkey - new install - questions bugs?

2003-09-18 Thread Carl Hudkins
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 04:12:49 +0100, Stroller wrote: - How do I change the umask that mlDonkey writes files with..? I want files world (or at least group) writable, so I can delete them over SMB from my workstation when I've moved them somewhere else. There may be a better way, but I'd

Re: [gentoo-user] Compile Problems

2003-09-18 Thread Fred Clausen
Fred Clausen wrote: I doubt this matters, but emerge info at the top says 2.4.20-gentoo-r6 while you are working on the gaming kernel. That's a bit strange, but probably not a problem. I had trouble with the gcc3.3 stuff. One of the main problems was it gets more strict about bits of code. I

Re: [gentoo-user] Compile Problems

2003-09-18 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 21:16, Fred Clausen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list Changing those flags made no difference. The kernel compilation appears to use the CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf I am considering downgrading gcc 3.2.x, but I really don't want to do that I certainly can

<    1   2