On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 07:56, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > On Friday 30 May 2003 22:53, Harald Arnesen wrote: > > "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> has anyone tried or used 3.3 yet? what would be implications or > > >> undesired side effects from rebuilding my system? is there direct > > >> confliction with glibc? i doubt it. any suggestions from anyone who > > >> has more knowledge than i do would be well appreciated :-) > > > > > > I have an Athlon XP and rebuild alsmost my whole system with gcc 3.3. > > > > > > KDE, QT, X, xine, xmms, most of the packages in 'system' like bash, tar, > > > textutil, libtool, awk,sed, grep... > > > > > > Gcc 3.3 is fast.. and I had no problems so far, but I have not tried > > > to build a kernel yet. > > > > I have built 2.5.69 and 2.5.70 on an K6-2 with gcc-3.3. Seems to work > > fine (for me). No crashes yet, with 2.5.69 I had an uptime of a couple > > of weeks, before I booted to 2.5.70 three days ago. > > 2.5.6X is still a nono for me.. every version freezes my system at bootup.. > and 2.4.21-rc* is fine for me.
I have an athlon-mp and could not get any of the 2.5 kernels to boot until I set the Processor Family->k6/k6-II/k6-III. After that I haven't had any problems. This would tend to suggest a compiler problem. -- Edward Middleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
