I just emerged gcc 3.3 on a test box. Went in smoothly and works well so far.
By tomorrow it'll have completed a emerge -ue world... I'll know for sure if
it's good move or not then.
Cheers.
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 03:13:19 +0200 Hemmann, Volker Armin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 23 June
On Saturday 21 June 2003 21:49, Mark Saunders wrote:
I emerge GCC 3.3 and emerge stopped working;
bash-2.05b$ sudo emerge -Du world
python2.2: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version `GCC_3.3' not found (required by
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3/libstdc++.so.5)
Any ideas?
Mark
I *think*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 22 June 2003 2:52 am, Zack Gilburd wrote:
| On Saturday 21 June 2003 21:49, Mark Saunders wrote:
| I emerge GCC 3.3 and emerge stopped working;
|
| I *think* that gcc-3.3 was mistakenly unmasked by drobbins.
|
| avenj also said the tree is
Hi,
On Sunday 22 June 2003 09:52, Zack Gilburd wrote:
I *think* that gcc-3.3 was mistakenly unmasked by drobbins.
avenj also said the tree is VERY unready for gcc-3.3.
Also, I think env-update'ing would have been a better choice.
I am using gcc 3.3 for some time now.
I compiled
On Sunday 22 June 2003 11:35, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
Hi,
On Sunday 22 June 2003 09:52, Zack Gilburd wrote:
I *think* that gcc-3.3 was mistakenly unmasked by drobbins.
avenj also said the tree is VERY unready for gcc-3.3.
Also, I think env-update'ing would have been a better
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ date ; echo ${Zack Gilburd}
Sunday 22 June 2003 04:32 pm
On Sunday 22 June 2003 11:35, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
gcc 3.3 is a lot faster than gcc 3.2 and I have less stability problems
with the same CFLAGS.
This is so wrong, I don't know where to begin. For one,
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 23:37:43 +0200 Hemmann, Volker Armin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---snip---
I rebuild whole KDE 3.1.2 in less time with gcc 3.3 , than kdelibs-3.1.2 and
kdebase-3.1.2 with gcc-3.2.3
Yes, there are some problems.
To emerge alsa, I have to edit
On Monday 23 June 2003 00:44, Jerry McBride wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 23:37:43 +0200 Hemmann, Volker Armin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---snip---
I rebuild whole KDE 3.1.2 in less time with gcc 3.3 , than kdelibs-3.1.2
and kdebase-3.1.2 with gcc-3.2.3
Yes, there are some problems.
To
I emerge GCC 3.3 and emerge stopped working;
bash-2.05b$ sudo emerge -Du world
python2.2: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version `GCC_3.3' not found (required by
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3/libstdc++.so.5)
Any ideas?
Mark
--
Mark Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cytek Pty Ltd
--
[EMAIL
sorry for the double post...
ln -s /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3/libgcc_s.so.1
libgcc_s-3.0.4.so.1
seemed to make the problem go away.
is there something missing from the ebuild for GCC 3.3?
Mark
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 14:49, Mark Saunders wrote:
I emerge GCC 3.3 and emerge stopped
On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 07:56, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2003 22:53, Harald Arnesen wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
has anyone tried or used 3.3 yet? what would be implications or
undesired side effects from rebuilding my system? is there direct
Hey J.
I assume that's exactly what he wanted. Was just explaining what 'empty tree'
would do for him...ask least what I think 'empty tree' will do for him.
On May 30, 2003 10:54 pm, Jesse Jacobs wrote:
Hello Reg,
Isn't that what's wanted?
It avoids bootstrapping.
j
reg hughson said:
Hi,
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 00:21, Brett Campbell wrote:
Hello list,
i use a pentium4 chip, and, despite a stable system, have just learned of
the invalid sse2 cruft. i am in fear for my system's health, regardless of
its excellent performance :). I have read that gcc 3.2.3 has fixed this
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
has anyone tried or used 3.3 yet? what would be implications or undesired
side effects from rebuilding my system? is there direct confliction with
glibc? i doubt it. any suggestions from anyone who has more knowledge
than i do would be well
On Friday 30 May 2003 22:53, Harald Arnesen wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
has anyone tried or used 3.3 yet? what would be implications or
undesired side effects from rebuilding my system? is there direct
confliction with glibc? i doubt it. any suggestions from
This is only somewhat related, but it sparked a question in my mind.
How does one rebuild the entire system/world if all the packages are
already up to date?
For example, my system reports...
diesel root # emerge system
Calculating system dependencies ...done!
Auto-cleaning packages ...
No
What does emerge -u --deep system (or world) -p give?
This is only somewhat related, but it sparked a question in my mind.
How does one rebuild the entire system/world if all the packages are
already up to date?
For example, my system reports...
diesel root # emerge system
Calculating
When run with world, it does in fact display many dependencies.
However, system only displays two.
diesel root # emerge -up --deep system
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating system dependencies ...done!
[ebuildU ] dev-python/python-fchksum-1.6.1-r1
Hello Mike,
Have u tried -e = empty tree?
j
Mike Bohan said:
When run with world, it does in fact display many dependencies.
However, system only displays two.
diesel root # emerge -up --deep system
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating system
emerge -e world
should re-emerge your entire system.
On May 30, 2003 10:32 pm, Jesse Jacobs wrote:
Hello Mike,
Have u tried -e = empty tree?
j
Mike Bohan said:
When run with world, it does in fact display many dependencies.
However, system only displays two.
diesel root #
Hello Reg,
Isn't that what's wanted?
It avoids bootstrapping.
j
reg hughson said:
emerge -e world
should re-emerge your entire system.
On May 30, 2003 10:32 pm, Jesse Jacobs wrote:
Hello Mike,
Have u tried -e = empty tree?
j
Mike Bohan said:
When run with world, it does in
On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 02:16, Brett Campbell wrote:
Hey thanks a lot for the reply. I'm currently building 3.2.3 as i write this (gcc
is huge!). I've also modified my cflags to be much more aggressive. When i rebuild
world, this will most likely break things; do you comply/agree? Even
Hello list,
i use a pentium4 chip, and, despite a stable system, have just learned of the invalid
sse2 cruft. i am in fear for my system's health, regardless of its excellent
performance :). I have read that gcc 3.2.3 has fixed this stuff, but i was
considering rebuilding the entire system
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 23:21, Brett Campbell wrote:
Hello list,
i use a pentium4 chip, and, despite a stable system, have just learned of the
invalid sse2 cruft. i am in fear for my system's health, regardless of its
excellent performance :). I have read that gcc 3.2.3 has fixed this stuff,
24 matches
Mail list logo
