Re: [gentoo-user] Installing unstable/testing packages

2003-03-08 Thread Fredrik Jagenheim
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:44:13PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote: Hmm, you're doing it the hard way, no doubts :-) # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge whateverpackage This is what I do. However, whenever I later do a emerge -u world, my whateverpackage will be downgraded to the old version. I'm

Re: [gentoo-user] Installing unstable/testing packages

2003-03-08 Thread Tomas Volka
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:30:20 +0100 Fredrik Jagenheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you can do emerge -uU world, -U flag should prevent unstable ebuilds which were emerged with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86. At least it works for me, im using nvidia 4xxx ebuilds which are normally masked. But with -U

[gentoo-user] Installing unstable/testing packages

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Giangrande
If I install some ebuilds from the unstable/testing group using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 can I then go back and remove the accept_keywords setting and install the stable package builds or will this cause a problem? If this is a problem, will I be able to install older ebuilds (say apache 1.3.27

Re: [gentoo-user] Installing unstable/testing packages

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Giangrande
What's the difference between the two? Jason Louis C. Candell wrote: Jason Giangrande [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If I install some ebuilds from the unstable/testing group using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 can I then go back and remove the accept_keywords setting and install the stable package

Re: [gentoo-user] Installing unstable/testing packages

2003-03-06 Thread Louis C. Candell
Jason Giangrande [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What's the difference between the two? One of them ( the one I suggested ) lets you unmask individual ebuilds as opposed to ACCEPT_KEY... which unmasks everything which is masked. Be warned, some ebuilds will not work without some tweaking, so do not

Re: [gentoo-user] Installing unstable/testing packages

2003-03-06 Thread Norberto Bensa
On Thursday 06 March 2003 08:08 pm, Louis C. Candell wrote: Jason Giangrande [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What's the difference between the two? One of them ( the one I suggested ) lets you unmask individual ebuilds as opposed to ACCEPT_KEY... which unmasks everything which is masked. Hmm,