rh wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:21:47 +0300
Theofilos Intzoglou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi rh!
I remember that if I try to start ooffice when my [EMAIL PROTECTED] program
is already running with nice 19 using all available cpu, ooffice took
about a minute to start giving me an empty window!
background and as soon as I killed it , openoffice works fine. I wish I
had of discovered this before I un-emerged openoffice and emerged
openoffice-bin. Is there a particular setting I can have setiathome
running and still get good response from openoffice?
Yes. You should run
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 02:23:18 +
Håvard Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rh wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:21:47 +0300
Theofilos Intzoglou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi rh!
I remember that if I try to start ooffice when my [EMAIL PROTECTED] program
is already running with nice 19
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 17:23:13 +0200
Sigurd Stordal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
background and as soon as I killed it , openoffice works fine. I wish I
had of discovered this before I un-emerged openoffice and emerged
openoffice-bin. Is there a particular setting I can have setiathome
It is rumored that on Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:16:45 -0400
rh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 02:23:18 +
Håvard Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rh wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:21:47 +0300
Theofilos Intzoglou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi rh!
I remember that if
Hi rh!
I remember that if I try to start ooffice when my [EMAIL PROTECTED] program
is already running with nice 19 using all available cpu, ooffice took
about a minute to start giving me an empty window! Switching between
open windows would make the window of ooffice appear transparent/empty
and
rh wrote:
Unmerged openoffice and emerged openoffice-bin. Same thing. Slow,
slow, slow.
Running any distributed computing stuff by any chance? Zetagrid? That's
what makes my Openoffice grind almost to a halt.
Cheers
Ulrich Plate
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:21:47 +0300
Theofilos Intzoglou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi rh!
I remember that if I try to start ooffice when my [EMAIL PROTECTED] program
is already running with nice 19 using all available cpu, ooffice took
about a minute to start giving me an empty window!
Hi rh!
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:15:06 -0400
rh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that was exactly the problem...I had setiathome running in the
background and as soon as I killed it , openoffice works fine. I wish
I had of discovered this before I un-emerged openoffice and emerged
openoffice-bin.
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:50:02 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 23:11:02 -0500
Richard Kilgore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:15:55PM -0400, rh wrote:
Hi.
Just finished emerge'ing openoffice (24 hours later!!) and it
is slower
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 23:11:02 -0500
Richard Kilgore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:15:55PM -0400, rh wrote:
Hi.
Just finished emerge'ing openoffice (24 hours later!!) and it
is slower than death. It can take sometimes 5-10 seconds just
to open the menus. Does
Hi.
Just finished emerge'ing openoffice (24 hours later!!) and it is slower than death. It
can take sometimes 5-10 seconds just to open the menus. Does anybody else have this
problem? And did you manage to correct it? I thought compiling the source would be
faster than the -bin files but I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Donnerstag, 14. August 2003 21:15, rh wrote:
Hi.
Just finished emerge'ing openoffice (24 hours later!!) and it is
slower than death. It can take sometimes 5-10 seconds just to open the
menus.
That's strange!
Did you compile with debug?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:15:55PM -0400, rh wrote:
Hi.
Just finished emerge'ing openoffice (24 hours later!!) and it
is slower than death. It can take sometimes 5-10 seconds just
to open the menus. Does anybody else have this problem? And did
you manage to correct it? I thought compiling
14 matches
Mail list logo
