On Saturday 13 December 2003 16:55, Sigurd Stordal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
reiserfs + ext3 newly created file system 51 GB
xfs 57 GB.
I had a partition with reiserfs before grow from 17 to 25 GB because
of filesystem inconsisty, but was ixable with reiserfschk.
Redeeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
/dev/hda3 on / type ext3 (rw,noatime)
is what my / is now, what exactly does the data=journal do in diffrence
from my standard ext3?
Ext3 w/ data=journal mount options is what you want.
More information in man mount, but essentially it journals
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 01:25, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
Redeeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose data,
i experience power loss quite often and i HAAATTTEEE when the filesystem
dies, i never lost files when i used fat32, but i want a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
reiserfs + ext3 newly created file system 51 GB
xfs 57 GB.
I had a partition with reiserfs before grow from 17 to 25 GB because of
filesystem inconsisty, but was ixable with reiserfschk.
If you want to get the most space out of your harddrive
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose data,
i experience power loss quite often and i HAAATTTEEE when the filesystem
dies, i never lost files when i used fat32, but i want a unix
filesystem, so far i think ext3 is okay, but it has anyway brought me
some problems, and
El Viernes, 12 de Diciembre de 2003 16:03, Redeeman escribió:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose data,...
ReiserFS or XFS are good.
i never lost files when i used fat32
jejejejeje.
--
-
Cordiales saludos
Manuel Pérez López
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 12 December 2003 17:13, Manuel Pérez López wrote:
El Viernes, 12 de Diciembre de 2003 16:03, Redeeman escribió:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose
data,...
ReiserFS or XFS are good.
Never, I mean NEVER
Redeeman wrote:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose data,
i experience power loss quite often
A backup UPS might be a better solution
dies, i never lost files when i used fat32
I'm not bashing DOS or Windows, but if that's true, you simply *got*
*lucky*.
You're starting a religous war by asking that G. I will
pass on my experiences for what they are worth.
Disclaimer - I am NOT dissing any other file systems.
You pick what works for the job and fits your needs.
I ran ext2 on previous boxes. With Gentoo I started using
XFS on all my
El Viernes, 12 de Diciembre de 2003 16:18, Adrian Pirciu escribió:
On Friday 12 December 2003 17:13, Manuel Pérez López wrote:
El Viernes, 12 de Diciembre de 2003 16:03, Redeeman escribió:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose
data,...
ReiserFS or XFS are
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 16:27, Hall Stevenson wrote:
Redeeman wrote:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose data,
i experience power loss quite often
A backup UPS might be a better solution
dies, i never lost files when i used fat32
I'm not bashing DOS
i have heard many ppl say jfs, what is the advantages/disadvantages of
these filesystems?
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 16:03, Redeeman wrote:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose data,
i experience power loss quite often and i HAAATTTEEE when the filesystem
dies, i never
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:03:34 +0100
Redeeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose data,
i experience power loss quite often and i HAAATTTEEE when the filesystem
dies, i never lost files when i
Hi,
On Friday 12 December 2003 16:03, Redeeman wrote:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose data,
i experience power loss quite often and i HAAATTTEEE when the filesystem
dies, i never lost files when i used fat32, but i want a unix
filesystem, so far i think ext3
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 17:15, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 12 December 2003 16:03, Redeeman wrote:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose data,
i experience power loss quite often and i HAAATTTEEE when the filesystem
dies, i never lost files when
Hi,
On Friday 12 December 2003 17:23, Redeeman wrote:
i read it was merged into 23
no, have a look here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=107107425916108w=2
Here goes 2.4.24-pre1...
The XFS filesystem has been merged.
Glück Auf
Volker
--
Conclusions
In a straight-up
Redeeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose data,
i experience power loss quite often and i HAAATTTEEE when the filesystem
dies, i never lost files when i used fat32, but i want a unix
filesystem, so far i think ext3 is okay, but it
begin quote
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:03:34 +0100
Redeeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose
data,
i experience power loss quite often and i HAAATTTEEE when the
filesystem
dies, i never lost files when i used fat32, but i want a unix
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 18:46, Spider wrote:
begin quote
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:03:34 +0100
Redeeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose
data,
i experience power loss quite often and i HAAATTTEEE when the
filesystem
dies, i
Redeeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose data,
i experience power loss quite often and i HAAATTTEEE when the filesystem
dies, i never lost files when i used fat32, but i want a unix
filesystem, so far i think ext3 is okay, but it
begin quote
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:46:25 +0100
Spider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
begin quote
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:03:34 +0100
Redeeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am looking for a filesystem where its almost impossible to loose
data,
i experience power loss quite often and i
21 matches
Mail list logo
