My (parallel port laser) printer started spewing garbage (i.e. pcl data as
text - a few characters per sheet) as a result, I think, of a loose cable.
Trouble is I can't stop it. I cleared the print jobs. Even stopped cups. Tried
to rmmod parport_pc and lp, but was refused. Tried pressing the
On 16 February 2006 09:56, Robert Persson wrote:
My (parallel port laser) printer started spewing garbage (i.e. pcl data as
text - a few characters per sheet) as a result, I think, of a loose cable.
Trouble is I can't stop it. I cleared the print jobs. Even stopped cups.
Tried to rmmod
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 18:20, Arnau Bria Ramírez wrote:
Hi,
I've installed nagios on my gentoo box and after some time of
configuration I pointed my web-browser to localhost/nagios and found
Error: Could not open CGI config file '/etc/nagios/cgi.cfg' for
reading! error message.
So I
El Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:03:12 +0100
Herman Grootaers dijo:
You just tested the configuration of nagios. To start it run either the
startscript in /etc/init.d, or if it does not exists with the same
command replacing the -v with -d. That should start nagios, and start
also the output on the
Hello,
I'm trying to install Centos as guest on Gentoo Vserver. I'm folowing this
Howto: http://linux-vserver.org/CentOS_HowTo ant this is result:
vlan10-virtual / # vserver min-centos4 build -m yum --hostname domain.com
--interface domain=eth0:192.168.0.136/24 --initstyle sysv --context 500
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:20:49 +
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have currently syslog-ng running, but I think I remember that
similar configuration was in /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf (maybe
commented out?)
Yes, it was commented out as the default setting is to send
At times you also have to go to the cups cache directory and delete the
print job there as well, as on restart it stats the printjob from the
beginning again. They really need to fix this ...
BillK
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 01:00 -0800, Robert Persson wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 00:18 Uwe
I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc space I should use for /.
My machine is Pentium4, 1GB RAM, 200 GB HD ATA
It's a desktop machine with Gentoo as the only and exclusive OS.
Will run KDE. Amarok, OpenOffice, firefox
Thanx!
40 GB is enough, these are my stats with / partition of 35GB / 200GB
Filesystemblocchi di 1K Usati Disponib. Uso% Montato su
*
/dev/sdb1 34185192 18272204 15912988 54% /
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:19:21 +0100, Izar Ilun wrote:
I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc
space I should use for /.
That depends on what you are going to put on it. Will /usr or /var be on
it? They use most of the space. 10GB will be plenty. I have / or a 300MB
I say that, It'll be just:
- /boot
- swap
- /home
- / (all the rest)On 2/16/06, Ibai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It'll be just:
- /boot
- swap
- /home
- / (all the rest)On 2/16/06, Neil Bothwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:19:21 +0100, Izar Ilun wrote: I'm installing Gentoo
Izar Ilun wrote:
I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc space
I should use for /.
512 MB.
The rest should go to filesystems for /var, /usr,
/opt and /home. And maybe also additional filesystems
for /usr/src and all that Gentoo stuff.
Alexander Skwar
--
BOFH Excuse
Izar Ilun wrote:
I say that, It'll be just:
- /boot
- swap
- /home
- / (all the rest)
That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
filesystems for /boot, swap, /home, /opt, /usr, /var
and / (of course). This way you're more flexible
and also a bit safer (not such a high risk of
Ernie Schroder wrote:
I am just starting to play with php and mysql. I've got mysql working and can
log into root accounts using a password. php scripts work on
http://localhost. For example, http://localhost/php/index.php in a browser
shows a whole lot of info re php, mysql and apache2.
On Thursday 16 February 2006 12:26, Arnau Bria Ramírez wrote:
El Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:03:12 +0100
Herman Grootaers dijo:
You just tested the configuration of nagios. To start it run either
the startscript in /etc/init.d, or if it does not exists with the
same command replacing the -v with
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:06:12 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
filesystems for /boot, swap, /home, /opt, /usr, /var
and / (of course). This way you're more flexible
and also a bit safer (not such a high risk of running
out of space on /).
But
I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc space
I should use for /.
512 MB.
The rest should go to filesystems for /var, /usr,
/opt and /home. And maybe also additional filesystems
fo
This is (part) what i have mount
i`ve instales stuff for workstation (no
This problem was solved already, I really commited a huge compilatiom mistake.
So, I decided using genkernl to help. But this is another thread ...
2006/2/15, Emmanuel Durin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The make module_install command installs the modules into
/lib/modules/2.x.xx/. Search for your file
Le mercredi 15 février 2006 à 04:42 -0800, Mark Knecht a écrit :
OK, good info - but what can I remove? Or more important how can I
find what's talking up too much space.
I know you've already solved that problem, but I think the following
might be interesting.
I found xdiskusage to be a
On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:06, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Izar Ilun wrote:
I say that, It'll be just:
- /boot
- swap
- /home
- / (all the rest)
That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
filesystems for /boot, swap, /home, /opt, /usr, /var
and / (of course). This way
On Thursday 16 February 2006 13:19, Izar Ilun wrote:
I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc space I
should use for /.
My machine is Pentium4, 1GB RAM, 200 GB HD ATA
It's a desktop machine with Gentoo as the only and exclusive OS.
Will run KDE. Amarok,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc space
I should use for /.
512 MB.
The rest should go to filesystems for /var, /usr,
/opt and /home. And maybe also additional filesystems
fo
This is (part) what i have mount
i`ve instales
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To put everything on its own partition was good, when harddisks were
2gb-10gb big. But today it is just a waste of space and time.
IMHO there still might be advantages to using more partitions,
for example security (you can mount /boot /tmp /home
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I say that, It'll be just:
- /boot
- swap
- /home
- / (all the rest)
That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
filesystems for /boot, swap, /home, /opt, /usr, /var
and / (of course).
Moreover I have created separate partitions
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:06, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Izar Ilun wrote:
I say that, It'll be just:
- /boot
- swap
- /home
- / (all the rest)
That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
filesystems for /boot, swap, /home, /opt, /usr, /var
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:06:12 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
filesystems for /boot, swap, /home, /opt, /usr, /var
and / (of course). This way you're more flexible
and also a bit safer (not such a high risk of running
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
still do the old style partitioning.
For example, in your setup, how do you make /var larger, if need
be?
With LVM, it would just be a matter of lvresize -L+512m
On 2/16/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on their own partition. Additionally, the more partitions, the more useless
head movement, the slower data transfer the earlier the harddisk dies.
I disagree. Sensible partitioning can _reduce_ head movement and
improve performance.
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
still do the old style partitioning.
Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do not have
control over physical placement of your partitions.
On 2/16/06 9:04 AM, Martin Eisenhardt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
still do the old style partitioning.
For example, in your setup, how do you make /var larger, if
-Original Message-
From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 February 2006 10:02
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with GRUB in the
installation of Gentoo
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:25:52 +0100, Bo Andresen wrote:
I always
On Thursday February 16 2006 16:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
still do the old style partitioning.
Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
still do the old style partitioning.
Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do not have
control over physical
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
you'll never fill up root, so making a lot of partitions is just wasted space.
No, it's not wasted space. Well, okay, not much wasted space.
And yes, I once put all and everything on its own partition.
I learnt the hard way, that this does not solve problems, it
On Thursday 16 February 2006 16:14, Robert Crawford wrote:
The main reason for putting /var, /tmp, and portage on their own
partitions is to minimize fragmentation on /, especially with a source
distro like Gentoo. And yes, Linux does fragment and does require
attention, especially with
On Thursday 16 February 2006 15:45, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:06, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Izar Ilun wrote:
I say that, It'll be just:
- /boot
- swap
- /home
- / (all the rest)
That's not advisable. I'd strongly
El Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:37:10 +0100
Herman Grootaers dijo:
So Nagios is started correctly.
Sure, and it send emails correctly. (it found my smtp server down during a
reboot)
Now another question: is apache running and if so is there an entry in
the apache-configuration for the nagios
On 2/16/06, Frédéric Grosshans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 15 février 2006 à 04:42 -0800, Mark Knecht a écrit :
OK, good info - but what can I remove? Or more important how can I
find what's talking up too much space.
I know you've already solved that problem, but I think the
On Thursday 16 February 2006 16:02, Richard Fish wrote:
Having / on its own partition can result in a similar improvement,
because the drive doesn't have to seek over your files in /home or
/opt to get to something in /lib.
it still has to move at the beginning of the partition, look up, where
On 2/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do not have
control over physical placement of your partitions. Right?
While true in theory, in practice the first LV you create is created
at the lowest numbered PV extents, which correspond to
On Thursday February 16 2006 16:30, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
still do the old style partitioning.
Correct me if I am
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:19:36 -, Michael Kintzios wrote:
make install does exactly the same, and sets up the vmlinuz and
vmlinuz.old symlinks to point to your new and previous kernel
respectively, so you don't need to edit grub.conf.
Hmm, it doesn't on my two boxen. :-( I do not
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:39:02 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
But far more chance of running out of space on /usr, /var or /opt
while
Not really. And even if so - who cares? Make the
fs larger, and you're set. Also, if those fs
run out of space, it's not a DoS.
No, but it means you have to
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:50:01 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I found xdiskusage to be a very practical tool to findout where space
is wasted on a disk. It's basically a tool giving a graphical output
to du, showing how the space is shared by directory and
subdirectories (and files with the -a
Moving my thread over to the proper list... first...
Now then - thanks to everyone on the list for your help. I've had barely
any sleep lately, so I must apologize first, for putting the original
thread onto the security mailing list by mistake.
For anyone who's wondering - I have an AMD64 box,
Great !!
Thx,
Rafael Fernández López.
pgpCt7WgJJcoM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Forgive me if this ends up being the stupid question of the day.
But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
(Obviously I could download it from kernel.org and go that route, but
I would like to keep as much as possible in
I just upgraded to BIND 9.3.2 and now when I try:
/etc/init.d/named start
it says:
* WARNING: named has already been started.
I used to have this problem before, so I checked my notes and saw this is what
I did to fix it:
oberon log # mkdir /var/run/named
oberon log # chmod 700
On 2/16/06, gentuxx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Forgive me if this ends up being the stupid question of the day.
But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
(Obviously I could download it from kernel.org and go that route, but
I
Chris Bare wrote:
I just upgraded to BIND 9.3.2 and now when I try:
/etc/init.d/named start
it says:
* WARNING: named has already been started.
Kill all named processes:
killall named
Tell the init script that you have done so:
/etc/init.d/named zap
Start named:
Martin Eisenhardt wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do not have
control over physical placement of your partitions. Right?
No, wrong, I am sorry :-D
You might let LVM choose where to put the extends for a newly created logical
volume, but you might also tell LVM where to
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:39:02 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
But far more chance of running out of space on /usr, /var or /opt
while
Not really. And even if so - who cares? Make the
fs larger, and you're set. Also, if those fs
run out of space, it's not a DoS.
No,
Alexander Skwar wrote:
I can't. But that's just not needed. Make the filesystems
as large as they *now* need to be. If more space is required,
extending is a matter of a few seconds.
I agree with that.
80GB drive, lvm up 50GB of it, and then you can grow whatever as needed.
It's not like you
Jarry wrote:
But even if it is so, if you resize partition by lvm, this advantage
could be lost. And if it even is possible to keep some partition
continuous, than resizing partition in lvm would be very long process:
if I resize 1st partition (the fastest, on the most outer cylinders)
and
Rumen Yotov wrote:
Now run: gcc-config 5 and check again with gcc-config -l that vanilla
is your default gcc profile.
Next try re-emerging GCC-3.4.4.
I tried. Changed to vanilla, verified, started re-emerging gcc, but it
failed without saying anything (frozen, after 4 hours of nothing-doing
Thanks all for your help!Turns out that Kasablanca will work for me, gftp for some reason or another crashes, but Konqueror still can't work correctly; guess is it has something to do with that bug.
On 2/16/06, Harm Geerts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 02:05, Ryan Holt
On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:27, James wrote:
It also looks like the power supply is not regulating very well?
Can I believe these voltages?
no
but you can never believe the voltages.
The absolut numbers are irrelevant.
What is important: are there any fluctuations? Does the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On 2/16/06, gentuxx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive me if this ends up being the stupid question of the day.
But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
(Obviously I could download it from kernel.org
quoth the Jeff:
See here:
hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 3016 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1507.91 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads:4 MB in 3.68 seconds = 1.09 MB/sec
Horribly slow! This machine should be blazing fast, with the 7200 rpm
200 GB hard drive, AMD64
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 19:25 +0100, Jarry wrote:
Rumen Yotov wrote:
Now run: gcc-config 5 and check again with gcc-config -l that vanilla
is your default gcc profile.
Next try re-emerging GCC-3.4.4.
I tried. Changed to vanilla, verified, started re-emerging gcc, but it
failed
On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:18, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 15:45, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:06, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Izar Ilun wrote:
I say that, It'll be just:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:32, Jeff wrote:
Moving my thread over to the proper list... first...
Now then - thanks to everyone on the list for your help. I've had barely
any sleep lately, so I must apologize first, for putting the original
thread onto the security mailing list by mistake.
is there a way to tell what packages are required by what? for
instance i have a package that is blocking another package when i do
an emerge, is there a way to tell if the package that is blocking the
other is actually needed by any other package on the system before i
unmerge it?
thanks
Nick
On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
I mean, u for update?
emerge -uav gentoo-sources
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
Total size of downloads: 0 kB
Nothing to
usualy portatge tells you what is blocking what
anyway try emerge -av it will give you an idea of what you need
On 2/16/06, Nick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a way to tell what packages are required by what? for
instance i have a package that is blocking another package when i do
On 2/16/06, Bo Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
I mean, u for update?
emerge -uav gentoo-sources
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies
gentuxx gentuxx at gmail.com writes:
emerge -uav gentoo-sources
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
Total size of downloads: 0 kB
Nothing to merge; do you want me to auto-clean packages? [Yes/No] n
when was the last time you
gentuxx schreef:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On 2/16/06, gentuxx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive me if this ends up being the stupid question of the
day.
But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
(Obviously I could download it from kernel.org and go that route,
but
On 2/16/06, Ghaith Hachem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
usualy portatge tells you what is blocking what
anyway try emerge -av it will give you an idea of what you need
right, but i want to know that the package im going to remove because
its blocking something else isnt needed by another package on
On 2/16/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 16:02, Richard Fish wrote:
Having / on its own partition can result in a similar improvement,
because the drive doesn't have to seek over your files in /home or
/opt to get to something in /lib.
it
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:18, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 15:45, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:06, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Izar Ilun wrote:
* On Feb 16 14:03, Nick Smith (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
# /etc/init.d/spamd start
* Starting spamd...
[18773] error: persistent_udp: no such method at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line
99 [ ok ]
I
On 2/16/06, Nick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/16/06, Ghaith Hachem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
usualy portatge tells you what is blocking what
anyway try emerge -av it will give you an idea of what you need
right, but i want to know that the package im going to remove because
its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Holly Bostick wrote:
gentuxx schreef:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On 2/16/06, gentuxx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive me if this ends up being the stupid question of the
day.
But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
(Obviously I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
james wrote:
gentuxx gentuxx at gmail.com writes:
emerge -uav gentoo-sources
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
Total size of downloads: 0 kB
Nothing to merge; do you want me to auto-clean
Hi list,
i've followed this how http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_fbsplash to have
a framebuffer splash under gentoo. I've added splash to the boot
runlevel; however the framebuffer images start only in the default
runlevel.
# rc-status boot
..
..
splash
..
..
This is the GRUB entries:
Rumen Yotov wrote:
Have you compiled anything after compiling GCC with 'hardened'? (genlop)
Negative, only gcc, then emerge failed trying to compile 2nd package -
glibc-2.3.5-r2. I tried to go back (removed those hardened-flags), and
could not compile gcc-3.4.4
Try with MAKEOPTS=-j1 in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bo Andresen wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
I mean, u for update?
emerge -uav gentoo-sources
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed
that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for x86. So I run an `emerge --sync`, and
`emerge -av gentoo-sources`. And it wants to rebuild my 2.6.13-r3
Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:40:49 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
needed - What's needed, anyway?
/ and swap, nothing else :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Crayons can take you more places than starships. * Guinan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On 2/16/06, Bo Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
I mean, u for update?
emerge -uav gentoo-sources
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 21:11, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:46:57 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
If partition A
runs out of space while partition B has plenty,
Then you made B too large, which is the main cause of the problem.
Of course, but if your needs change,
On Thursday 16 February 2006 20:40, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:18, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 15:45, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Thursday 16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed
that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for x86. So I run an `emerge --sync`, and
`emerge -av gentoo-sources`. And it wants
-Original Message-
From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 February 2006 16:10
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with GRUB in the
installation of Gentoo
make install does exactly the same, and sets up the vmlinuz and
On 2/16/06 11:05 AM, Michael Kintzios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 February 2006 16:10
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with GRUB in the
installation of Gentoo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mick wrote:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On 2/16/06, Bo Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
I mean, u for update?
emerge -uav gentoo-sources
These are
On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:21, Alexander Skwar wrote:
You *can* tell LVM where to put LVs but you do not *have* to.
But how do you actually do that? Or are you talking about
the allocation policy? Like --contiguous y?
Well, first of all, you can pass lvcreate a list of physical
Jarry wrote:
So now (I hope!) my system is in consistent state, as it was
before my little experiment
Well, you have had a kernel oops, and it looks like you may have had
another (the emerge of gcc that did nothing for 4 hours), so...
something doesn't seem quite right. Keep watching your
Michael Kintzios schreef:
-Original Message- From: Neil Bothwick
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 February 2006 16:10 To:
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re:
Problems with GRUB in the installation of Gentoo
make install does exactly the same, and sets up
On 2/16/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/ and swap, nothing else :)
Well if we are going to be silly, you actually only need /
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:53:21 -0800, gentuxx wrote:
eix -e gentoo-sources
* sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
Available versions: 2.4.28-r9 ~2.4.31-r1 2.6.9-r9 2.6.12-r9
2.6.12-r10 ~2.6.13 ~2.6.13-r1 ~2.6.13-r2 2.6.13-r3
Installed: 2.6.11-r5 2.6.11-r6 2.6.11-r8 2.6.11-r9
On 2/16/06, Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My impression is that you haven't yet run make install.Can't youusegenkernelinstead ?
Uwe Thiem uwix at iway.na writes:
With a dial-up connection, you haven't much chance other than connecting to a
time server when your connection is up. I do it automatically
in /etc/ppp/ip-up.
Hey, this is cool, do you have an example 'ip-up' config file? I
have used ppp quite a lot to
John Jolet wrote:
On 2/16/06 11:05 AM, Michael Kintzios [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 February 2006 16:10
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with GRUB in the
Frino Klauss schreef:
On 2/16/06, Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My impression is that you haven't yet run make install.
Can't you use genkernel instead ?
I have no idea; I've never used genkernel, and am unlikely to ever do
so. Since it is a mostly automated process (though you can
On Thursday 16 February 2006 20:53, gentuxx wrote:
Do you have eix installed? If not I suggest you install it.
No, I just installed it. So this is the first time running these
commands - if that makes any difference.
Well, that's why you had to run update-eix. If you intend to use eix in the
Holly Bostick wrote:
My impression is that you haven't yet run make install.
HTH,
Holly
Spot on! I'll try it out next time I compile a kernel Holly, thank you for
clarifying matters.
--
Regards,
Mick
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 2/16/06, Frino Klauss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/16/06, Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My impression is that you haven't yet run make install.
Can't you use genkernel instead ?
Yes, if you want, if you use it with --install it will copy the latest
kernel, map and initrd to
On Thursday 16 February 2006 04:06 William Kenworthy was like:
At times you also have to go to the cups cache directory and delete the
print job there as well, as on restart it stats the printjob from the
beginning again. They really need to fix this ...
When I shut down cupsd the printer
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
