On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:39:09 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
My personal favorite tho, smart fans. My CPU has a sensor under it and
varies the CPU fan with temp. I have done the same with my case fans
and it works pretty well. One spinning at a good rate is best tho just
to keep air
Sebastian Günther schrieb:
* Florian Philipp (li...@f_philipp.fastmail.net) [20.03.09 19:09]:
fei huang schrieb:
I don't have any xdm, gdm stuff but would like to start my windows
manager directly at startup, cause I'm the only one that use it.
You know that this is a possible security
Mike Kazantsev wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:39:09 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
My personal favorite tho, smart fans. My CPU has a sensor under it and
varies the CPU fan with temp. I have done the same with my case fans
and it works pretty well. One spinning at a good rate
On Saturday 21 Mar 2009, Dale wrote:
What may also be a good idea is to have some way to shut the systems
down when they get to hot or if the A/C fails. I would think a
temperature sensor would be better myself. I !think! gkrellm can do
that. I'm sure there is a way to do it automatically
Hi,
when I run emerge -p --depclen, I get these results:
[...]
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
x11-libs/qt
selected: 4.4.2
protected: none
omitted: 3.3.8b-r1
x11-libs/qt-assistant
selected: 4.4.2-r1
protected: none
omitted: none
Marc Blumentritt schrieb am 21.03.2009 14:33:
Hi,
when I run emerge -p --depclen, I get these results:
[...]
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
x11-libs/qt
selected: 4.4.2
protected: none
omitted: 3.3.8b-r1
x11-libs/qt-assistant
selected: 4.4.2-r1
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:26:36 -0500, Dale wrote:
What may also be a good idea is to have some way to shut the systems
down when they get to hot or if the A/C fails.
Most BIOSes will do this automatically,although they tend to let the
temperature get quite high. lm_sensors includes a daemon that
Hi,
I found out my /usr is getting full pretty fast, so I want
to increase it before it happens a real problem. I have:
/dev/md4 (sda5+sdb5), ~5GB size, used for /var, nearly empty
/dev/md5 (sda6+sdb6), ~5GB size, used for /usr, nearly full (90%)
And I have /backup on separate partition (hda1),
On Saturday 21 March 2009 20:05:42 Jarry wrote:
Hi,
I found out my /usr is getting full pretty fast, so I want
to increase it before it happens a real problem. I have:
/dev/md4 (sda5+sdb5), ~5GB size, used for /var, nearly empty
/dev/md5 (sda6+sdb6), ~5GB size, used for /usr, nearly full
Am Samstag, 21. März 2009 19:05:42 schrieb Jarry:
I found out my /usr is getting full pretty fast, so I want
to increase it before it happens a real problem. I have:
/dev/md4 (sda5+sdb5), ~5GB size, used for /var, nearly empty
/dev/md5 (sda6+sdb6), ~5GB size, used for /usr, nearly full (90%)
Am Samstag, 21. März 2009 19:12:56 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
cp -a /mnt/gentoo/backup/var /mnt/gentoo/var
cp -a /mnt/gentoo/backup/usr /mnt/gentoo/usr
Um, no. This gives you new usr and var directories like so:
/usr/usr/
/var/var
You want:
cp -a /mnt/gentoo/backup/var /mnt/gentoo/
cp
Alan McKinnon wrote:
cp -a /mnt/gentoo/backup/var /mnt/gentoo/var
cp -a /mnt/gentoo/backup/usr /mnt/gentoo/usr
Um, no. This gives you new usr and var directories like so:
/usr/usr/
/var/var
You want:
cp -a /mnt/gentoo/backup/var /mnt/gentoo/
cp -a /mnt/gentoo/backup/usr /mnt/gentoo/
Thanks
On Saturday 21 March 2009 20:39:08 Jarry wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
cp -a /mnt/gentoo/backup/var /mnt/gentoo/var
cp -a /mnt/gentoo/backup/usr /mnt/gentoo/usr
Um, no. This gives you new usr and var directories like so:
/usr/usr/
/var/var
You want:
cp -a /mnt/gentoo/backup/var
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 05:44:04PM -0400, dhk wrote
revdep-rebuild is flagging rhythmbox as requiring
libtotem-plparser.so.10 . After the last upgrade all I have installed
in /usr/lib64/ is libtotem-plparser.so.12 . Should I just make a link
or do I need to install an older
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 19:39 +0100, Jarry wrote:
I remember having lvm2 a few years ago, and despite of that I could not
extend any partition, which was being used. What is then lvm2 good for,
if I can not extend partitions on-the-fly? I can not unmount /usr before
extending...
This is
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:39:08 +0100, Jarry wrote:
I remember having lvm2 a few years ago, and despite of that I could not
extend any partition, which was being used. What is then lvm2 good for,
if I can not extend partitions on-the-fly? I can not unmount /usr before
extending...
You can
With all the words of LVM2 going on, I feel it is only appropriate to also
mention the risk.
On a desktop I had installed LVM2 considering that I did need to upgrade
partitions every now and then and my previous solution was add another
drive/partition and cross mount - e.g. like done with
So, I checked for updates and I saw this.
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] app-text/tree-1.5.2.2 [1.5.2.1]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/libxml2-2.7.3 [2.7.2-r2]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/glib-2.18.4-r1 [2.16.6]
[ebuild N]
Michael P. Soulier schrieb am 21.03.2009 22:17:
So, I checked for updates and I saw this.
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] app-text/tree-1.5.2.2 [1.5.2.1]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/libxml2-2.7.3 [2.7.2-r2]
[ebuild U ]
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
So, I checked for updates and I saw this.
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] app-text/tree-1.5.2.2 [1.5.2.1]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/libxml2-2.7.3 [2.7.2-r2]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/glib-2.18.4-r1
On 21/03/09 Nick Fortino said:
It seems like you are reading the message correctly, but you are focusing
on the wrong part. The problem here is gail, not gtk+. What should happen
is gail-1000 is installed as part of this upgrade, and then the block is
resolved. The output of equery list -p
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 21/03/09 Nick Fortino said:
It seems like you are reading the message correctly, but you are focusing
on the wrong part. The problem here is gail, not gtk+. What should happen
is gail-1000 is installed as part of this upgrade, and then the block is
resolved.
I have another dead power supply and/or another dead motherboard in my
Gentoo router. I've tried to make that system as silent as possible
and I wonder if I'm paying the price. How do you guys monitor system
temperatures? Is lm_sensors the way to go? How do you keep an eye on
the
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:26:36 -0500, Dale wrote:
What may also be a good idea is to have some way to shut the systems
down when they get to hot or if the A/C fails.
Most BIOSes will do this automatically,although they tend to let the
temperature get quite high.
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:58:05 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:26:36 -0500, Dale wrote:
What may also be a good idea is to have some way to shut the systems
down when they get to hot or if the A/C fails.
Most BIOSes will do this
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:13:49 -0700 (PDT), BRM wrote:
So, unless you are looking to use LVM in a soft-RAID solution between
multiple physical drives, not multiple partitions on the same drive,
(e.g. partition A = sda1 + sda2, with mirror on sdb1+sdb2), then I
would not suggest it as should
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:58:05 -0500, Dale wrote:
Most BIOSes will do this automatically,although they tend to let the
temperature get quite high. lm_sensors includes a daemon that will
monitor temperatures and send warnings and alarms.
I may be wrong here, but doesn't it just shut off like
Ok now, I'm getting fed up with all of the breakage that I've seen in Gentoo
in the last few months.
I'm trying to upgrade MythTV. Emerge told me to upgrade my profile, which I
did.
Now I'm doing an emerge -u world.
But before I could do that, I had to upgrade portage, with made sense.
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:17:53 -0600
Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote:
Has Gentoo become such a moving target that it's no longer suitable for
normal, every day, usage?
If you're prepared to update you system at least once a week and
have up-to-date knowledge of all the installed stuff, so
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 14:13 -0700, BRM wrote:
With all the words of LVM2 going on, I feel it is only appropriate to also
mention the risk.
On a desktop I had installed LVM2 considering that I did need to upgrade
partitions every now and then and my previous solution was add another
Mike Kazantsev wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:17:53 -0600
Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote:
Has Gentoo become such a moving target that it's no longer suitable for
normal, every day, usage?
If you're prepared to update you system at least once a week and
have up-to-date
On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:00:11 Dale wrote:
Mike Kazantsev wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:17:53 -0600
Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote:
Has Gentoo become such a moving target that it's no longer suitable for
normal, every day, usage?
If you're prepared to update you system at
32 matches
Mail list logo
