On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:37:44 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
Dovecot will store them where you tell it to. You could have easily
stored them all in a single directory like /var/virtual/mail/user, or
even used a hashed directory scheme (which might be desirable for very
large installations like
Hi, this is a resume post from...
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org/msg102327.html
--
I follow all step of
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86-quickinstall.xml but when i
finally go to install gnome... in the latests package (mailclient or
something similar) fail...
Please don't hijack threads. Previous discussion explanation:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org/msg71515.html
Sorry i'll use icedove button reply list, and changed title (i tought
that this create a new message).
Sorry. I'll write a new post with resume of answers.
On Monday 14 June 2010 09:43:05 Jose Juan Montiel wrote:
i'll use icedove button reply list, and changed title (i tought that
this create a new message).
I don't know what icedove is, but what you need is not to reply to
anything but to start a new message. Changing titles does not start a
Hi,
but what you need is not to reply to
anything but to start a new message. Changing titles does not start a
new thread, nor should it. Ask yourself: what is the difference between a
/new/ message and a /reply/ to another message?
You should be able just to click on the list address in
On Monday 14 June 2010 10:11:19 Jose Juan Montiel wrote:
Thanks, now i know this.
We all have to start somewhere - good luck!
--
Rgds
Peter.
On 2010-06-13 6:37 PM, David W Noon wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:20:02 +0200, Tanstaafl wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail?:
On 2010-06-12 5:17 PM, David W Noon wrote:
I wanted the messages to be stored in a single, dedicated
logical volume in my DASD farm.
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:15:43 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
That said... does anyone know of a repo that provides good quality up to
date builds of dovecot - maybe even including the 2.0 betas?
How about the portage tree, which goes up to 2.0 bets 5?
--
Neil Bothwick
To most people solutions mean
On 2010-06-14 9:09 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:15:43 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
That said... does anyone know of a repo that provides good quality
up to date builds of dovecot - maybe even including the 2.0 betas?
How about the portage tree, which goes up to 2.0 bets 5?
Hi,
due to a disk crash I've lost my root partition.
Unfortunately, the backup version is 4 weeks old.
But my /usr partition is up-to-date and I have
binary build-pkgs.
What's the fastest way to restore the portage-relevant
data on the root partition?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
--
Helmut
On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
due to a disk crash I've lost my root partition.
Unfortunately, the backup version is 4 weeks old.
But my /usr partition is up-to-date and I have
binary build-pkgs.
What's the fastest way to restore the portage-relevant
data on the root
Dan Johansson dan.johans...@dmj.nu writes:
After a recent gcc upgrade (4.3.4 - 4.4.3-r2) on an amd64, pdftk won't
compile anymore. Although I like the pdtk I'm looking for a replacement as
pdft is no more maintained (last release November 28, 2006).
Any suggestions for a good command line
On 14 Jun, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
due to a disk crash I've lost my root partition.
Unfortunately, the backup version is 4 weeks old.
But my /usr partition is up-to-date and I have
binary build-pkgs.
What's the fastest way to restore
On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 14 Jun, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
due to a disk crash I've lost my root partition.
Unfortunately, the backup version is 4 weeks old.
But my /usr partition is up-to-date and I have
On 06/14/10 12:19, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 14 Jun, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
due to a disk crash I've lost my root partition.
Unfortunately, the backup version is 4
My personal workstation is a dual-boot setup with Gentoo and Windows XP.
A long time ago, I set up Samba on another computer on my network to
provide extra hard drive space to our Windows installations. They used
to work, but we haven't used them in some time. I tried to use it today
and it
On 14 Jun 2010, at 21:41, Michael Sullivan wrote:
... When I try to connect to the samba share from my
linux install, I get this:
mich...@camille ~ $ smbclient //carter//home
Enter michael's password:
Domain=[MYGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.4.6]
tree connect failed:
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 22:43 +0100, Stroller wrote:
If it's been some time since this system was used, are you still using
the 192.168.1.x subnet? If your ISP sent you a new router, you might
now be on 192.168.0.x. IMO change this to:
hosts allow = 192.168. 127.
I bought a brand new
Michael Sullivan writes:
4: mich...@camille ~ $ nmblookup -B BIGSERVER __SAMBA__
querying __SAMBA__ on 192.168.1.255
192.168.1.2 __SAMBA__00
4: carter ~ # nmblookup -B camille *
querying xorg.conf.new on 192.168.1.3
name_query failed to find name xorg.conf.new
*I'm not sure what
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 02:12 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
Michael Sullivan writes:
4: mich...@camille ~ $ nmblookup -B BIGSERVER __SAMBA__
querying __SAMBA__ on 192.168.1.255
192.168.1.2 __SAMBA__00
4: carter ~ # nmblookup -B camille *
querying xorg.conf.new on 192.168.1.3
20 matches
Mail list logo
