On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:03:36 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
The postfix issue is separate and needs a glibc downgrade to fix.
I am not sure I understand. I did the glibc upgrade and have not
downgraded. I run postfix and my mail is coming and going. I had
thought/hoped that postfix does
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Looking for a simple way to do a big copy at the command line. I
have a bunch of files (maybe 100 right now, but it will grow) that I
can find with locate and grep:
c2stable ~ # locate Correlation | grep Builder |
Hi,
I think cups-1.4.6 and my HP printer via USB can't live in harmony.
Often, it gets stuck. Then it tries to use feed 1 (manual feed)
although I have configured cups to use feed 2.
Can I just remove hlip from my system, delete and add my printer again
in cups.
Has anybody made similar
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:38:37 +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote:
Another way to do it is with find:
find /home/mark/Builder -type f -iname '*csv' -exec cp {}
~mark/CorrelationTests \;
Replace \; with + for a faster process, as Mark said there are hundreds
of these files.
Or, if you use zsh instead of
2011/2/9 Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de:
Hi,
I think cups-1.4.6 and my HP printer via USB can't live in harmony.
Often, it gets stuck. Then it tries to use feed 1 (manual feed)
although I have configured cups to use feed 2.
Can I just remove hlip from my system, delete and
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at arcor.de writes:
I use ati-drivers-10.11
All the instructions you received assume that you were using
xf86-video-ati, *not* ati-drivers (also known as AMD Catalyst for
Linux, AMD's proprietary binary driver for Radeon cards).
Do *not* install any firmware
On 02/09/2011 12:58:07 PM, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
2011/2/9 Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de:
Hi,
I think cups-1.4.6 and my HP printer via USB can't live in
harmony.
Often, it gets stuck. Then it tries to use feed 1 (manual feed)
although I have configured cups to use
On 02/09/2011 12:56:09 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:38:37 +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote:
Another way to do it is with find:
find /home/mark/Builder -type f -iname '*csv' -exec cp {}
~mark/CorrelationTests \;
Replace \; with + for a faster process, as Mark said there are
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
Do *not* install any firmware files and make sure you disable the radeon
driver completely in the kernel. Not only KMS, but no driver *at all*.
oops, I forgot to post the graphics section, for review:
# Graphics support
#
CONFIG_AGP=y
On Wed, Feb 09 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:03:36 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
The postfix issue is separate and needs a glibc downgrade to fix.
I am not sure I understand. I did the glibc upgrade and have not
downgraded. I run postfix and my mail is coming and
2011/2/9 Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de:
AFAIR it worked just fine with CUPS-1.3.x
Then why don't you use stable cups?
I do have CONFIG_USB_PRINTER=y in my kernel configuration.
New cups 1.4 can make use of the libusb package via the usb use flag.
Without it uses the kernel USB
Hi,
I'm trying to create a stage4 spec file.
Running the spec, sys-apps/net-tools-1.60-r13 doesn't compile.
There is a bug about this.
So I want to specify for catalyst to install a later version of this
package.
How can I do that?
Regards,
Kfir
Hello,
So looking at the handbook, I was wondering
why it does not describe how to use Disk Labels
during the installation process. Dunno.
So I poised this question on gentoo-doc
and got this encouraging response from *JOSH*
snip
Some discussion on modifying the Gentoo Handbook to describe
James wrote:
Hello,
So looking at the handbook, I was wondering
why it does not describe how to use Disk Labels
during the installation process. Dunno.
So I poised this question on gentoo-doc
and got this encouraging response from *JOSH*
snip
James
Given that some folks on here have
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
James wrote:
Hello,
So looking at the handbook, I was wondering
why it does not describe how to use Disk Labels
during the installation process. Dunno.
So I poised this question on gentoo-doc
and got this encouraging
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
On 02/09/2011 12:56:09 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:38:37 +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote:
Another way to do it is with find:
find /home/mark/Builder -type f -iname '*csv' -exec cp {}
On 9. 2. 2011 15:16, Dale wrote:
So looking at the handbook, I was wondering
why it does not describe how to use Disk Labels
during the installation process. Dunno.
Given that some folks on here have ran into USB drives changing the
order of partitions, I think this is a good idea.
The same
Jarry mr.jarry at gmail.com writes:
So I agree there should be at least some basic info about
disk-labels in the handbook.
OK guys let's all chime on on the bug with
ideas and verbiage, or we just need one
really smart admin, to post some
text and we're off to the races.
Me, I still struggle
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:51:46 + (UTC), James wrote:
These aren't needed to get a system up and running. Yeah, Ubuntu uses
them for various ID purposes, but nothing really critical. Unless
there's a clear need for them, for example if some package in the
@system set will use them in a way
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
Jarry mr.jarry at gmail.com writes:
So I agree there should be at least some basic info about
disk-labels in the handbook.
OK guys let's all chime on on the bug with
ideas and verbiage, or we just need one
really smart admin, to post some
text and we're
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 06:46:34 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
One thing I didn't make clear in my original post - it didn't seem
important to confuse my real question which was the copy itself and
not locating the files - but which likely changes how well some of
these commands would work in my
On 20:07 Tue 08 Feb , Mark Shields wrote:
Interesting. Did you build this up from a stage1 or stage2 tarball?
Hi Mark,
actually, neither. ;-) I just took an existing stage3 tarball that I
unpacked and chrooted into. I then changed the CHOST / CFLAGS and
rebuild everything, finally tarring
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:27 on Wednesday 09 February 2011, Mark
Knecht did opine thusly:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
James wrote:
Hello,
So looking at the handbook, I was wondering
why it does not describe how to use Disk Labels
during
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 06:46:34 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
One thing I didn't make clear in my original post - it didn't seem
important to confuse my real question which was the copy itself and
not locating the files - but
On 13:34 Mon 07 Feb , Neil Bothwick wrote:
Don't install glibc-2.13 if you either use prelinking or run postfix.
After testing it on my netbook, which uses neither, I installed it on my
desktop and home server and broke both.
Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Nils Holland wrote:
Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc 2.13
krept onto my first machine Monday night - I generally test new
versions of such far reaching stuff as glibc on a single machine
first before letting to onto all of my
On 02/09/2011 12:05 PM, Elaine C. Sharpe wrote:
I'm a little confused about use of the term disk labels in
this discussion. Isn't a disk label a fs level ID (I create
those when I make my fs)? Using UUID in fstab for quite awhile
here (due to multiple external drives), but those aren't disk
On 02/09/2011 02:31 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Nils Holland wrote:
Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc 2.13
krept onto my first machine Monday night - I generally test new
versions of such far reaching stuff as glibc on a single
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:03 on Wednesday 09 February 2011, Alan
McKinnon did opine thusly:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:41 on Monday 07 February 2011,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
On trying my last world update with --deep and --newuse, etc. I get the
following
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:23 on Thursday 10 February 2011, Nils
Holland did opine thusly:
On 13:34 Mon 07 Feb , Neil Bothwick wrote:
Don't install glibc-2.13 if you either use prelinking or run postfix.
After testing it on my netbook, which uses neither, I installed it on my
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:48:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
And it's very difficult to downgrade it due to that hidden barf check
in the ebuild. I have yet to find a supported, documented way to back
out of glibc screw-ups; my way is to keep binpkgs of @system and use
those.
The trouble is
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:34:59 -0800, walt wrote:
On 02/09/2011 02:31 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Nils Holland wrote:
Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc 2.13
krept onto my first machine Monday night - I generally test new
110210 Alan McKinnon wrote:
glibc is problematic, it's tentacles run very deep in any GNU system,
it has a less than stellar history in terms of breaking gentoo systems,
mostly due to inadequate testing before releasing to ~arch.
it's v difficult to downgrade it due to that hidden barf check
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:05 on Thursday 10 February 2011, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
Or maybe Alan, if he's done polishing his humility plugin :p
What make you think he's got one... or even know what it is :)
Yeah, come to think of it, what is that thing anyway? Must be
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:09:14 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
(1) I never use testing versions of system pkgs like Glibc
Someone has to or they'll never get tested.
(2) I have FEATURES=buildsyspkg in make.conf .
It didn't help here.
Beyond those, I'ld say Gentoo users are grown-ups who don't
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:05 on Thursday 10 February 2011, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
Or maybe Alan, if he's done polishing his humility plugin :p
What make you think he's got one... or even know what it is :)
Yeah, come to think of it,
=== On Wed, 02/09, Dale wrote: ===
Now some of you know how much I hate windows. Of course, DOS wasn't
much better,
===
Yep. I've been using Linux on my desktop since version 1.2, and
UnixWare before that. Some Mac in there too. I avoid Windows like the
plague that it is.
-- Keith Dart
--
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:03 on Wednesday 09 February 2011, Alan
McKinnon did opine thusly:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:41 on Monday 07 February 2011,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
On trying my last world update
110210 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:09:14 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
(1) I never use testing versions of system pkgs like Glibc
Someone has to or they'll never get tested.
Come on ! -- not on a production system !
(2) I have FEATURES=buildsyspkg in make.conf .
It didn't
39 matches
Mail list logo
