On 25 September 2011 03:15, Nilesh Govindarajan cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
It's stunning to know that something that's shipped by default with
Ubuntu sucks so much? Canonical surely must have gone haywire.
It wouldn't be the first time that they've effectively tested software
by pushing it out
I updated gcc and when I ran fix_libtool_files.sh I get this:
# fix_libtool_files.sh i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.5
* Scanning libtool files for hardcoded gcc library paths...
cat: ld.so.conf.d/*.conf: No such file or directory
* [1/5] Scanning /lib ...
* [2/5] Scanning /usr/lib ...
* [3/5]
Am 25.09.2011 12:53, schrieb Mick:
I updated gcc and when I ran fix_libtool_files.sh I get this:
# fix_libtool_files.sh i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.5
* Scanning libtool files for hardcoded gcc library paths...
cat: ld.so.conf.d/*.conf: No such file or directory
* [1/5] Scanning /lib ...
*
On 09/25/2011 03:53 AM, Mick wrote:
I updated gcc and when I ran fix_libtool_files.sh I get this:
# fix_libtool_files.sh i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.5
* Scanning libtool files for hardcoded gcc library paths...
cat: ld.so.conf.d/*.conf: No such file or directory
* [1/5] Scanning /lib ...
*
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:56 AM, James Broadhead
jamesbroadh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 September 2011 03:15, Nilesh Govindarajan cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
It's stunning to know that something that's shipped by default with
Ubuntu sucks so much? Canonical surely must have gone haywire.
It
On Sunday 25 Sep 2011 16:37:48 Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 25.09.2011 12:53, schrieb Mick:
I updated gcc and when I ran fix_libtool_files.sh I get this:
# fix_libtool_files.sh i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.5
* Scanning libtool files for hardcoded gcc library paths...
cat:
On 25 September 2011, at 17:05, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
…
But with Unity the problem is much more than being pushed before time:
Unity is a project sponsored by Canonical, and if you want to
contribute code to it, you need to sign a Contributor License
Agreement (CLA), …
… I can
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 25 September 2011, at 17:05, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
…
But with Unity the problem is much more than being pushed before time:
Unity is a project sponsored by Canonical, and if you want to
contribute code to
Hi,
Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
to connect to a WEP2 home network?
If got the modules installed and the hardware telling me it sees
all sorts of ESSIDs but so far I cannot figure out how to give it the
password correctly. I've been trying to follow
Am 25.09.2011 22:38, schrieb Mark Knecht:
Hi,
Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
to connect to a WEP2 home network?
If got the modules installed and the hardware telling me it sees
all sorts of ESSIDs but so far I cannot figure out how to give it the
On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 20:54 +0100, Stroller wrote:
The end users do not give a monkey's uncle about the CLA. They just
want to use the software, and our distro already provides Sun Java
binaries, Unreal Tournament and stuff under all sorts of licenses. If
people want to use it, and it's in the
On Sunday 25 Sep 2011 21:59:05 Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 25.09.2011 22:38, schrieb Mark Knecht:
Hi,
Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
to connect to a WEP2 home network?
If got the modules installed and the hardware telling me it sees
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
The end users do not give a monkey's uncle about the CLA. They just want to
use the software, and our distro already provides Sun Java
On 25 September 2011, at 23:17, Albert W. Hopkins wrote:
…
I think the important thing, for me anyway, is not the general user
community, but the open source development community. Most of those
people reluctant to sign their code over to another organization.
None of this has got anything
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
to connect to a WEP2 home network?
Do you mean WPA2 or WEP? AFAIK there's no such thing as WEP2.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 25.09.2011 22:38, schrieb Mark Knecht:
Hi,
Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
to connect to a WEP2 home network?
If got the modules installed and the hardware telling me it
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
to connect to a WEP2 home network?
Do you mean WPA2 or WEP? AFAIK
On 25 September 2011, at 21:21, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
…
At the moment there are very mixed feelings about Unity. There are a good
number of people who hate it, but there are some others who say I love it,
except that I hate that it doesn't let me move the menu bar. Because Unity
is
On Sep 26, 2011 6:37 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 25.09.2011 22:38, schrieb Mark Knecht:
Hi,
Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
to connect to a WEP2 home
ifplugd or netplug.
This is the better option IMO.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
ifplugd or netplug.
This is the better option IMO.
Or skip the net config/init scripts stuff and just use something like wicd.
I'd like to whitelist sites to allow their cookies to stay
permanently, then have all other sites cookies deleted upon browser
close. Can anyone recommend a cookie manager?
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to whitelist sites to allow their cookies to stay
permanently, then have all other sites cookies deleted upon browser
close. Can anyone recommend a cookie manager?
Cookie Monster is great, it's what I use. If
Cookie Monster is great, it's what I use. If you're familiar with
the NoScript or RequestPolicy add-ons, it operates very much the same
way. It lets you have fine-grained control over which cookies you
allow or block, and you can allow cookies from a site for this
browsing session only.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Cookie Monster is great, it's what I use. If you're familiar with
the NoScript or RequestPolicy add-ons, it operates very much the same
way. It lets you have fine-grained control over which cookies you
allow or block,
I believe it uses the browser's setting as default.
Yeah that appears to be it, but you have a restart FF for CM to pick
up the new setting.
26 matches
Mail list logo
