On 28 September 2011 22:56, Spidey / Claudio spide...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 00:44, Arun Raghavan
arun.ragha...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 00:20 -0300, Spidey / Claudio wrote:
I haven't tried the masked version, but I follow the PA maillist and
haven't seen
svn can restrict access to directories
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2288810/how-to-restrict-svn-repository-user-account-to-one-directory
That would be perfect if it allowed access per file instead of per
directory. I thought about re-arranging the layout to accommodate
that limitation
The problem with that is he will need to test his code in the working
system.
why in the production system?
I need a way for him to be able to read/write to a certain
file or files within the working system, but have no read/write
access to any other files in the system.
Is SFTP perhaps
On Thursday 29 Sep 2011 07:57:49 Jonas de Buhr wrote:
The problem with that is he will need to test his code in the working
system.
why in the production system?
I need a way for him to be able to read/write to a certain
file or files within the working system, but have no
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:23:30 -0700, Grant wrote:
For some reason I thought SFTP would provide access control but now
I'm thinking it's just like SSH in that access control is based on
file ownership and permissions? If that's the case, can anyone think
of a better way to control remote
Sanity check please gurus :)
I've installed the new disks, partitioned them and created the md
devices, which are now syncing. The kernel already has all the modules
built in. I believe the next steps are;
1 mkfs the md devices
2 copy the partitions from the current disk to the mirror
3 edit fstab
You are absolutely right!
when I added asound.conf again, all alsa sources are directed to
pulseaudio and again no sound.
I am not an expert with pulseaudio. If you can help me there, I would
thank you.
In the meanwhile I will see how to get it handled. As I got it
(hopefully) solved, I will
Am 29.09.2011 11:00, schrieb Adam Carter:
Sanity check please gurus :)
I've installed the new disks, partitioned them and created the md
devices, which are now syncing. The kernel already has all the modules
built in. I believe the next steps are;
1 mkfs the md devices
2 copy the partitions
On Thursday 29 Sep 2011 04:40:15 Spidey / Claudio wrote:
I have lived through some lock ups in the recent past, but that's
because I've disassembled my desktop from it's case and assembled it
at my working table. Since both PS/2 ports of the mobo are on my mouse
pad (yeah, short cables, tight
On 09/29/2011 08:18 AM, Dale wrote:
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On Thu 29 Sep 2011 06:42:42 AM IST, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
That's debian HCL, what about Gentoo? We compile the kernel ourselves
man.
It would be better if we don't use debian/Ubuntu HCL to decide HW for
other distros,
On Thu 29 Sep 2011 05:02:40 PM IST, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 29.09.2011 11:00, schrieb Adam Carter:
Sanity check please gurus :)
I've installed the new disks, partitioned them and created the md
devices, which are now syncing. The kernel already has all the modules
built in. I believe the
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Alex Sla 4k3...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Alex Sla 4k3...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Spidey / Claudio wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 00:34, Pandu Poluanpa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Sep 29, 2011 9:51 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
As a general rule, hardware support is in the kernel. It shouldn't
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Alex Sla 4k3...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Alex Sla 4k3...@googlemail.com wrote:
I just read in the Internet something about 1.2 - 1.4 should i do this
like
Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Dale makes note of the thing faster than light. Maybe I will get to live
longer now. lol I get about 7 to 8 years out of a build. So, I just went
from say 16 more years to say 24 or so. At my age with my
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:44:06PM +, James wrote:
The kernel gyrations are all really about something much more important.
*MONEY*
...Commercial distros like Apple's offering are making
billions.
OS X is not a linux distribution.
It uses the xnu kernel, which fuses elements of BSD
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 09/29/2011 08:18 AM, Dale wrote:
As a general rule, hardware support is in the kernel. It shouldn't
matter much whether it is Gentoo, Redhat, Debian or any other distro.
It just matters that the kernel supports the hardware. I would imagine
that anything listed
Nilesh Govindarajan contact at nileshgr.com writes:
These two motherboards came to my notice which support the above
processor: Gigabyte 880GM - GA 880GM-USB3L 880GM-USB3
Dunno.
How good is Linux support with those? If bad, what other mobos support
1075T and Linux support is awesome?
I'm
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Tamer Higazi th9...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 29.09.2011 01:27, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Tamer Higazi th9...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 29.09.2011 00:03, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Tamer
Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 09:11:09 schrieb J.Marcos Sitorus:
Hi Volker,
Thanks for the reply.
I have attach dmesg, xorg log, xsession-error, and kdm log.
So - get back to your last working versions - oh and those lvm volumes are
on
new disks?
Nope. Previously I have two separate
Am Mittwoch 28 September 2011, 17:15:34 schrieb Grant Edwards:
Regardless, my point was that Linus's statement that it's unacceptable
to break things seemed rather disingenuous given the API churn that
Linux has compared with the BSD kernels.
Linux has zero userland visible API 'churn'.
Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 01:27:27 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 17:52:24 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
which is your own fucking fault.
Get your drivers into the kernel. Problem solved.
Does gratuitous obscenity come naturally to you, or do you have to work
Am Mittwoch 28 September 2011, 23:24:41 schrieb Nilesh Govindarajan:
I'll be soon getting a new desktop.
I've fixed the CPU as AMD Phenom II 1075T
These two motherboards came to my notice which support the above
processor: Gigabyte 880GM - GA 880GM-USB3L 880GM-USB3
How good is Linux
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Linux has zero userland visible API 'churn'.
During what timeframe?
There have been massive Linux API breakages in 2004.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch 28 September 2011, 17:15:34 schrieb Grant Edwards:
Regardless, my point was that Linus's statement that it's unacceptable
to break things seemed rather disingenuous given the API churn that
On 2011-09-29, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch 28 September 2011, 17:15:34 schrieb Grant Edwards:
Regardless, my point was that Linus's statement that it's unacceptable
to break things seemed rather disingenuous given the API churn that
Linux has compared
On 2011-09-29, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch 28 September 2011, 17:15:34 schrieb Grant Edwards:
Regardless, my point was that Linus's statement that it's unacceptable
to break things seemed rather disingenuous given the API churn that
Linux has compared
On 09/28/2011 10:42 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Doh!
I had forgotten there was a seperate kvm-enabled build of Qemu. I'll
have to give that a try.
You can use qemu-kvm whether or not you have a kernel/CPU with KVM support:
$ cat /usr/bin/kvm
#!/bin/sh
exec
On 09/29/2011 04:13 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:23:30 -0700, Grant wrote:
For some reason I thought SFTP would provide access control but now
I'm thinking it's just like SSH in that access control is based on
file ownership and permissions? If that's the case, can anyone
On 28 September 2011 15:12, Alex Sla 4k3...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Alex Sla 4k3...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net wrote:
* Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net [110928 16:05]:
Am 28.09.2011
Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
Now I save that in a file called foo.c
The above piece of code is valid in C as well as C++
Now see this:
nilesh@Linux ~ $ cat /tmp/foo.c
int func(int a = 1) {}
nilesh@Linux ~ $ gcc
Deleting files were slow as hell too.
Claudio Roberto França Pereira (a.k.a. Spidey)
hardMOB - HTForum - @spideybr
Engenharia de Computação - UFES 2006/1
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:39, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 29 Sep 2011 04:40:15 Spidey / Claudio wrote:
I have lived
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
Now I save that in a file called foo.c
The above piece of code is valid in C as well as C++
Now see
* Nilesh Govindarajan cont...@nileshgr.com [110929 13:33]:
Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
No they're not. C doesn't have default function arguments.
Now I save that in a file called foo.c
The above piece of
On Thu 29 Sep 2011 11:10:00 PM IST, Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
Now I save that in a file called foo.c
The
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net wrote:
* Nilesh Govindarajan cont...@nileshgr.com [110929 13:33]:
Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
No they're not. C doesn't have default function
On Thu 29 Sep 2011 11:13:54 PM IST, Todd Goodman wrote:
* Nilesh Govindarajan cont...@nileshgr.com [110929 13:33]:
Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
No they're not. C doesn't have default function arguments.
Now I
Hi, Gentoo!
Why are there so many packages whose versions never become stable? By
many, I mean here at least two. :-)
These are the kernel and Firefox.
My kernel is currently 2.6.39-gentoo-r3, built on July 18. By examining
ebuilds, I now see that the ~amd64 is already up to 3.0.4-r1. I've
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:57:25 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote about
[gentoo-user] Strange GCC behavior:
Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
Now I save that in a file called foo.c
The above piece of code is valid in C
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hi, Gentoo!
Why are there so many packages whose versions never become stable? By
many, I mean here at least two. :-)
These are the kernel and Firefox.
My kernel is currently 2.6.39-gentoo-r3, built on July 18. By
James wrote:
Nilesh Govindarajancontactat nileshgr.com writes:
These two motherboards came to my notice which support the above
processor: Gigabyte 880GM - GA 880GM-USB3L 880GM-USB3
Dunno.
How good is Linux support with those? If bad, what other mobos support
1075T and Linux support is
On 09/29/2011 01:55 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo!
Why are there so many packages whose versions never become stable? By
many, I mean here at least two. :-)
These are the kernel and Firefox.
My kernel is currently 2.6.39-gentoo-r3, built on July 18. By examining
ebuilds, I
Il 29/09/2011 20:56, Michael Orlitzky ha scritto:
Firefox (= 4) and the kernel (= 3) are special cases, already
explained by Michael Mol.
I know of the problems with 3.x kernels, but what's the problem with
firefox?
On Thursday 29 Sep 2011 18:35:13 Spidey / Claudio wrote:
Deleting files were slow as hell too.
Hmm ... no, not here. Reiser4 pretty much blew the doors off anything else I
have ever used in Linux land. (I have not tried btrfs yet).
I can't even blame reiser4 for the 'temperamental' behaviour
2011/9/29 Niccolò Belli darkba...@linuxsystems.it:
Il 29/09/2011 20:56, Michael Orlitzky ha scritto:
Firefox (= 4) and the kernel (= 3) are special cases, already
explained by Michael Mol.
I know of the problems with 3.x kernels, but what's the problem with
firefox?
Upstream underwent a
Il 29/09/2011 21:38, Michael Mol ha scritto:
Upstream underwent a massive shift in their release pattern which
results in a great deal more work for anyone who needs to vet the
software before it gets redistributed.
No, they don't: there will be long term support releases suitable for
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.comwrote:
On 09/28/2011 10:42 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Doh!
I had forgotten there was a seperate kvm-enabled build of Qemu. I'll
have to give that a try.
You can use qemu-kvm whether or not you have a kernel/CPU
Il 29/09/2011 00:04, Mark Knecht ha scritto:
For the first time in a couple of years I had a total hard hang
You are lucky, it happened tons of times to me.
Hi,
I am running krdc to use some MSWindows programs in another computer. As
some of them are pretty CPU intensive, I prefer to do it this way rather
than using a virtual machine. Besides this, I did not want to bother to
install everything again.
When I move the mouse down to the task
fra...@gmail.com writes:
When I move the mouse down to the task bar area, the mouse pointer
changes from the remote machine native shape to the local desktop shape,
showing visually the fact that I can not click on any task bar icons.
Does the same happen when using rdesktop?
Wonko
How good is Linux support with those? If bad, what other mobos support
1075T and Linux support is awesome?
most probably they will just work.
I've just built a machine based on GA-880-GM-UD2H that I bought a
couple of years ago, and it works well. It supports 1090T and 1100T,
which you should
which is your own fucking fault.
Get your drivers into the kernel. Problem solved.
Does gratuitous obscenity come naturally to you, or do you have to work at
it?
I am naturally grumpy.
Yeah we've noticed ;) I like reading your posts because you know
stuff, and I like the fireworks.
On 09/29/11 16:07, Matthew Finkel wrote:
$ cat /usr/bin/kvm
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm $@
But I was under the impression you can only use -enable-kvm if you have
KVM built into the kernel/load the module.
It will spit out a warning, but
On Friday 30 September 2011 01:45:39 Adam Carter wrote:
Be careful though, being grumpy is dangerously seductive.
It is? You could have fooled me
--
Rgds
Peter Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23
On Sep 30, 2011 2:45 AM, Niccolò Belli darkba...@linuxsystems.it wrote:
Il 29/09/2011 21:38, Michael Mol ha scritto:
Upstream underwent a massive shift in their release pattern which
results in a great deal more work for anyone who needs to vet the
software before it gets redistributed.
Be careful though, being grumpy is dangerously seductive.
It is? You could have fooled me
Sorry - I meant being grumpy is seductive for the grumpy person. Its
pretty much the opposite for the people they interact with, as you
imply.
On Sep 30, 2011 1:10 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hi, Gentoo!
Why are there so many packages whose versions never become stable? By
many, I mean here at least two. :-)
These are the kernel and Firefox.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:51, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Tamer Higazi th9...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am 29.09.2011 01:27, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Tamer Higazi th9...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am 29.09.2011
On 09/29/2011 09:42 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Several days ago I did raise my concern on this behavior when I noticed
that emerge wants to downgrade my hardened-sources. Although I'm using
~amd64, I draw the line on 3.0 and specified ~2.6.39.
Now I'm forced to maintain a private/personal
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 01:27:27 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 17:52:24 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
which is your own fucking fault.
Get your drivers into the kernel. Problem solved.
Does gratuitous obscenity come naturally to you,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 01:27:27 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 17:52:24 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
I am naturally grumpy.
Wonder what I am? Then again, does it
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 15:57, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Arun Raghavan
arun.ragha...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 02:56 -0300, Spidey / Claudio wrote:
[...]
My bad, hadn't synced yet before that post. I'll test it throughly
Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 01:27:27 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 17:52:24 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
I am naturally grumpy.
Wonder what I am?
63 matches
Mail list logo
