On Sunday 10 Mar 2013 04:10:24 Grant wrote:
Thanks for the link. Which ssl_ciphers do you use? Which one does
openssl show you're using? I have:
ssl_ciphers ALL:!aNULL:!ADH:!eNULL:!MEDIUM:!LOW:!EXP:!kEDH:RC4+RSA:+HIGH;
To see what openssl is configured to use try:
openssl ciphers
Hello Everyone,
I have a couple of questions concerning what graphic drivers you use. Does
anyone use the proprietary ATI drivers, or have used them? Would you recommend
them? I just recently started using the ati-drivers package, but I don't
really notice a difference - yes it does say
Am 10.03.2013 09:54, schrieb Chris Walters:
Hello Everyone,
I have a couple of questions concerning what graphic drivers you use.
Does anyone use the proprietary ATI drivers, or have used them? Would
you recommend them? I just recently started using the ati-drivers
package, but I don't
Am 10.03.2013 09:54, schrieb Chris Walters:
Hello Everyone,
I have a couple of questions concerning what graphic drivers you use.
Does anyone use the proprietary ATI drivers, or have used them? Would
you recommend them? I just recently started using the ati-drivers
package, but I don't
Am 10.03.2013 00:53, schrieb cosmoslx lin:
2013/3/10 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com
mailto:volkerar...@googlemail.com
Am 09.03.2013 19:15, schrieb Florian Philipp:
Hi list!
Whenever I do sequential IO for a long stretch of time (e.g.
md5summing
Hello,
I ran into some trouble about an hour ago…
My workstation has an onboard Realtek Ethernet which only works with the r8168
driver.
Unfortunately, this driver is not in the kernel, but available to be compiled
as a kernel module. (I guess because of som patents)
That worked for quite some
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Wagener st...@gmx.net wrote:
Hello,
I ran into some trouble about an hour ago…
My workstation has an onboard Realtek Ethernet which only works with the
r8168 driver.
Unfortunately, this driver is not in the kernel, but available to be compiled
as
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:36:55 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Wagener st...@gmx.net wrote:
Hello,
I ran into some trouble about an hour ago…
My workstation has an onboard Realtek Ethernet which only works with the
r8168
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Wagener st...@gmx.net wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:36:55 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Wagener st...@gmx.net wrote:
Hello,
I ran into some trouble about an hour ago…
My workstation
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:49:02 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Wagener st...@gmx.net
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:36:55 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Wagener
On 10/03/2013 20:28, Daniel Wagener wrote:
Hello,
I ran into some trouble about an hour ago…
My workstation has an onboard Realtek Ethernet which only works with the
r8168 driver.
Unfortunately, this driver is not in the kernel, but available to be compiled
as a kernel module. (I guess
A recent update world leads to a notice that
/etc/udev/hwdb.bin needs to be updated
When I tried cfg-update I received a waring asking
who/what updated a binary file and suggested caution.
Is there any danger in updating the file?
Since it is binary would I be better off using a simple
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz wrote:
[...]
I use the ati-drivers package, and I'd say there are pretty solid now. I
first started using ati-drivers with my HD2600 card card - as the kernel
drivers did not support the power saving mechanisms of the card.
Am 10.03.2013 19:28, schrieb Daniel Wagener:
Hello,
I ran into some trouble about an hour ago…
My workstation has an onboard Realtek Ethernet which only works with the
r8168 driver.
Unfortunately, this driver is not in the kernel, but available to be compiled
as a kernel module. (I guess
On 03/10/2013 12:19 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 10/03/2013 03:42, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:41:13PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
The trouble with NAT is that it destroys peer-to-peer protocols.
The first was FTP in Active mode.
In its day, it was OK. Nowadays, we use
Thanks for the link. Which ssl_ciphers do you use? Which one does
openssl show you're using? I have:
ssl_ciphers ALL:!aNULL:!ADH:!eNULL:!MEDIUM:!LOW:!EXP:!kEDH:RC4+RSA:+HIGH;
and 'openssl s_client -host HOSTNAME -port 443' shows:
Cipher: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
I also get
On 03/09/2013 07:53 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Lookup ipvshit
I'll give you a hint.
The guy who wrote most of the pf firewall that MAC OSX now uses as well
as QNX, the latest version originating from OpenBSD and being far better
than iptables has bought up lots of ipv4 just to stay away
Thanks for the link. Which ssl_ciphers do you use? Which one does
openssl show you're using? I have:
ssl_ciphers ALL:!aNULL:!ADH:!eNULL:!MEDIUM:!LOW:!EXP:!kEDH:RC4+RSA:+HIGH;
To see what openssl is configured to use try:
openssl ciphers
Thank you but I'm most interested in the
On 10/03/2013 23:07, Michael Mol wrote:
All those examples you give are much like a bunch of home machines
sitting behind a NAT gateway onto the internet. That's actually OK
and I reckon that is the intended use of NAT.
I want to point out that that's only true if the home network has at
On 03/09/2013 07:53 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
There is no reason to believe that IPv6 will result in an
increased use of IPsec.
Bull. The biggest barrier to IPsec use has been NAT! If an
intermediate router has to rewrite the packet to change the
apparent source and/or destination
On 03/10/2013 05:43 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 10/03/2013 23:07, Michael Mol wrote:
All those examples you give are much like a bunch of home machines
sitting behind a NAT gateway onto the internet. That's actually OK
and I reckon that is the intended use of NAT.
I want to point out that
Am 10.03.2013 13:48, schrieb Florian Philipp:
Am 10.03.2013 00:53, schrieb cosmoslx lin:
2013/3/10 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com
mailto:volkerar...@googlemail.com
Am 09.03.2013 19:15, schrieb Florian Philipp:
Hi list!
Whenever I do sequential IO for a
Am 10.03.2013 21:48, schrieb Alecks Gates:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz
wrote:
[...]
I use the ati-drivers package, and I'd say there are pretty solid now. I
first started using ati-drivers with my HD2600 card card - as the kernel
drivers did not
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:53:42 +0100
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 10.03.2013 19:28, schrieb Daniel Wagener:
Hello,
I ran into some trouble about an hour ago…
My workstation has an onboard Realtek Ethernet which only works
with the r8168 driver.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz wrote:
Am 10.03.2013 21:48, schrieb Alecks Gates:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz
wrote:
[...]
I use the ati-drivers package, and I'd say there are pretty solid now. I
first started
On 10/03/13 21:04, Daniel Wagener wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:49:02 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Mmmh. What sources do you use? In vanilla-sources-3.8.2, there is a
r8169 driver:
./drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
config R8169
tristate Realtek 8169 gigabit
On 03/09/2013 01:41 PM, v_2e wrote:
Hello!
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:46:04 -0800
walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW I just upgraded lo to 4.0.1.2 and no one has sent me any
power-point files recently so I really don't know yet if they would
play properly or not.
Could you please check if
walt wrote:
On 03/09/2013 01:41 PM, v_2e wrote:
Hello!
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:46:04 -0800
walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW I just upgraded lo to 4.0.1.2 and no one has sent me any
power-point files recently so I really don't know yet if they would
play properly or not.
Could you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/10/2013 06:00 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
It's been ages since I looked at that link and longer addresses
would certainly be needed anyway but certainly with DNSSEC again
concocted by costly unthoughtful and unengaging groups who chose
to
On 03/10/2013 09:56 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 03/10/2013 06:00 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
It's been ages since I looked at that link and longer addresses
would certainly be needed anyway but certainly with DNSSEC again
concocted by costly unthoughtful and unengaging groups who chose
to
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 05:07:25PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote
NAT behind a home router is bad, too. For IPv4, it's only necessary
because there aren't enough IPv4 addresses to let everyone have a unique
one.
The best real reason for moving to IPV6 is address space (or lack
thereof, in the
On 03/11/2013 12:00 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 05:07:25PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote
NAT behind a home router is bad, too. For IPv4, it's only necessary
because there aren't enough IPv4 addresses to let everyone have a unique
one.
The best real reason for moving to
You guys were so right. What an excellent http server/proxy. I used
this very simple howto:
http://kbeezie.com/apache-with-nginx/
I can probably dump a lot of apache config. I still need SSL on both
servers even though only nginx faces the user?
For imap proxy, nginx requires an HTTP
33 matches
Mail list logo
